mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Leveraging Discrete Function Decomposability for Scientific Design

arXiv 2511.03032 ↗First posted 4 Nov 2025cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In the era of AI-driven science and engineering, we often want to design discrete objects in silico according to user-specified properties. For example, we may wish to design a protein to bind its target, arrange components within a circuit to minimize latency, or find materials with certain properties. Given a property predictive model, in silico design typically involves training a generative model over the design space (e.g., protein sequence space) to concentrate on designs with the desired properties. Distributional optimizationunicodex2013which can be formalized as an estimation of distribution algorithm or as reinforcement learning policy optimizationunicodex2013finds the generative model that maximizes an objective function in expectation. Optimizing a distribution over discrete-valued designs is in general challenging because of the combinatorial nature of the design space. However, many property predictors in scientific applications are decomposable in the sense that they can be factorized over design variables in a way that could in principle enable more effective optimization. For example, amino acids at a catalytic site of a protein may only loosely interact with amino acids of the rest of the protein to achieve maximal catalytic activity. Current distributional optimization algorithms are unable to make use of such decomposability structure. Herein, we propose and demonstrate use of a new distributional optimization algorithm, Decomposition-Aware Distributional Optimization (DADO), that can leverage any decomposability defined by a junction tree on the design variables, to make optimization more efficient. At its core, DADO employs a soft-factorized "search distribution"unicodex2013a learned generative modelunicodex2013for efficient navigation of the search space, invoking graph message-passing to coordinate optimization across linked factors.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Nov 2025.

Builds on

19 of 58 references.

References · 19

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
  3. 2019Advantage-Weighted Regression: Simple and Scalable Off-Policy Reinforcement Learningcited by 750
  4. 2020AWAC: Accelerating Online Reinforcement Learning with Offline Datasetscited by 647
  5. 2018Reinforcement Learning and Control as Probabilistic Inference: Tutorial and Reviewcited by 466
  6. 2015High Dimensional Bayesian Optimisation and Bandits via Additive Modelscited by 137
  7. 2019Conditioning by adaptive sampling for robust designcited by 110
  8. 2022Design-Bench: Benchmarks for Data-Driven Offline Model-Based Optimizationcited by 96
  9. 2021Conservative Objective Models for Effective Offline Model-Based Optimizationcited by 87
  10. 2018High-Dimensional Bayesian Optimization via Additive Models with Overlapping Groupscited by 58
  11. 2020Autofocused oracles for model-based designcited by 50
  12. 2023Are Random Decompositions all we need in High Dimensional Bayesian Optimisation?cited by 35
7 more
  1. 2018Design by adaptive samplingcited by 31
  2. 2024Bridging Model-Based Optimization and Generative Modeling via Conservative Fine-Tuning of Diffusion Modelscited by 24
  3. 2017Decentralized High-Dimensional Bayesian Optimization with Factor Graphscited by 23
  4. 2020High-Dimensional Bayesian Optimization via Tree-Structured Additive Modelscited by 22
  5. 2024Functional Graphical Models: Structure Enables Offline Data-Driven Optimizationcited by 11
  6. 2023Relaxing the Additivity Constraints in Decentralized No-Regret High-Dimensional Bayesian Optimizationcited by 8
  7. 2019A view of Estimation of Distribution Algorithms through the lens of Expectation-Maximizationcited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.