Rethinking Learnability in Offline Data-driven Optimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Black-Box Optimization (BBO) has broad applications, while traditional algorithms such as evolutionary algorithms and Bayesian optimization face efficiency challenges as real-world BBO problems grow increasingly complex. Data-driven optimization has been the most popular paradigm to improve the efficiency of BBO, by learning from data. Offline data-driven optimization seeks high-quality solutions using only a fixed set of previous evaluations, attracting substantial attention because it requires no additional online evaluations. Many offline optimization methods have been proposed, but a fundamental question remains unanswered: what learnability is sufficient for offline optimization? Prior theoretical studies show that Probably Approximately Correct (PAC) learnability is insufficient, as the optimal region may remain poorly learned even when most regions are well learned. In this paper, we propose algorithm-dependent learnability, which requires accuracy only on the optimizer's trajectory. We prove that its value-query form is sufficient for representative discrete settings, including greedy and local search for submodular maximization, while its first-order analogue is sufficient for projected gradient descent on convex minimization. Motivated by this notion, we formalize a trajectory-learning framework comprising trajectory construction, trajectory modeling, and candidate generation, and analyze existing trajectory-based methods under it. We further propose Uncertainty-aware Gradient-guided Trajectory Learning (UGTL), which constructs locally coherent improvement trajectories reflecting plausible search paths, models them with conditional diffusion, and selects a diverse candidate set. Our experiments show that UGTL achieves the best average rank, 3.1/25, among 25 methods on Design-Bench tasks, and confirm that our trajectory construction plays a significant role in the improvement.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 41 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Sep 2026.
Builds on
41 of 72 references.
References · 41
- 2022Planning with Diffusion for Flexible Behavior Synthesiscited by 1,061
- 2016The CMA Evolution Strategy: A Tutorialcited by 377
- 2019Conditioning by adaptive sampling for robust designcited by 111
- 2022Design-Bench: Benchmarks for Data-Driven Offline Model-Based Optimizationcited by 97
- 2021Conservative Objective Models for Effective Offline Model-Based Optimizationcited by 88
- 2019Model Inversion Networks for Model-Based Optimizationcited by 83
- 2022Towards Learning Universal Hyperparameter Optimizers with Transformerscited by 81
- 2015Bayesian optimization for materials designcited by 80
- 2023Diffusion Models for Black-Box Optimizationcited by 76
- 2023PFNs4BO: In-Context Learning for Bayesian Optimizationcited by 73
- 2019ROBEL: Robotics Benchmarks for Learning with Low-Cost Robotscited by 72
- 2021Few-Shot Bayesian Optimization with Deep Kernel Surrogatescited by 71
29 more
- 2021Offline Model-Based Optimization via Normalized Maximum Likelihood Estimationcited by 38
- 2022Monte Carlo Tree Search based Variable Selection for High Dimensional Bayesian Optimizationcited by 37
- 2022Generative Pretraining for Black-Box Optimizationcited by 36
- 2022Multi-agent Dynamic Algorithm Configurationcited by 36
- 2022Bidirectional Learning for Offline Infinite-width Model-based Optimizationcited by 35
- 2023Discovering Attention-Based Genetic Algorithms via Meta-Black-Box Optimizationcited by 33
- 2022Data-Driven Offline Decision-Making via Invariant Representation Learningcited by 31
- 2023Importance-aware Co-teaching for Offline Model-based Optimizationcited by 28
- 2023Parallel-mentoring for Offline Model-based Optimizationcited by 26
- 2021Reinforced Few-Shot Acquisition Function Learning for Bayesian Optimizationcited by 23
- 2023Macro Placement by Wire-Mask-Guided Black-Box Optimizationcited by 23
- 2019Submodular Maximization Beyond Non-negativity: Guarantees, Fast Algorithms, and Applicationscited by 21
- 2024Offline Model-Based Optimization via Policy-Guided Gradient Searchcited by 19
- 2024Guided Trajectory Generation with Diffusion Models for Offline Model-based Optimizationcited by 15
- 2025Offline Model-Based Optimization: Comprehensive Reviewcited by 15
- 2024Reinforced In-Context Black-Box Optimizationcited by 14
- 2024Offline Multi-Objective Optimizationcited by 14
- 2015The Limitations of Optimization from Samplescited by 13
- 2024Offline Model-Based Optimization by Learning to Rankcited by 13
- 2024Functional Graphical Models: Structure Enables Offline Data-Driven Optimizationcited by 11
- 2024Generative Adversarial Model-Based Optimization via Source Critic Regularizationcited by 10
- 2024Monte Carlo Tree Search based Space Transfer for Black-box Optimizationcited by 7
- 2025Towards Universal Offline Black-Box Optimization via Learning Language Model Embeddingscited by 7
- 2020Optimization from Structured Samples for Coverage Functionscited by 6
- 2025BBOPlace-Bench: Benchmarking Black-Box Optimization for Chip Placementcited by 5
- 2025ROOT: Rethinking Offline Optimization as Distributional Translation via Probabilistic Bridgecited by 4
- 2025Sequential Multi-Agent Dynamic Algorithm Configurationcited by 3
- 2025Diversity By Design: Leveraging Distribution Matching for Offline Model-Based Optimizationcited by 2
- 2026On the Learnability of Offline Model-Based Optimization: A Ranking Perspectivecited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.