mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Subjective and Objective Analysis of Indian Social Media Video Quality

arXiv 2401.02794 ↗First posted 5 Jan 2024eess.IV cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We conducted a large-scale subjective study of the perceptual quality of User-Generated Mobile Video Content on a set of mobile-originated videos obtained from the Indian social media platform ShareChat. The content viewed by volunteer human subjects under controlled laboratory conditions has the benefit of culturally diversifying the existing corpus of User-Generated Content (UGC) video quality datasets. There is a great need for large and diverse UGC-VQA datasets, given the explosive global growth of the visual internet and social media platforms. This is particularly true in regard to videos obtained by smartphones, especially in rapidly emerging economies like India. ShareChat provides a safe and cultural community oriented space for users to generate and share content in their preferred Indian languages and dialects. Our subjective quality study, which is based on this data, offers a boost of cultural, visual, and language diversification to the video quality research community. We expect that this new data resource will also allow for the development of systems that can predict the perceived visual quality of Indian social media videos, to control scaling and compression protocols for streaming, provide better user recommendations, and guide content analysis and processing. We demonstrate the value of the new data resource by conducting a study of leading blind video quality models on it, including a new model, called MoEVA, which deploys a mixture of experts to predict video quality. Both the new LIVE-ShareChat dataset and sample source code for MoEVA are being made freely available to the research community at https://github.com/sandeep-sm/LIVE-SC

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jan 2024.

Builds on

28 of 52 references.

References · 28

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  3. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  4. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  5. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
  6. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
  7. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
  8. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,712
  9. 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,803
  10. 2017The Kinetics Human Action Video Datasetcited by 1,894
  11. 2021MUSIQ: Multi-scale Image Quality Transformercited by 1,058
  12. 2016Joint Face Detection and Alignment using Multi-task Cascaded Convolutional Networkscited by 895
16 more
  1. 2019Data-Efficient Image Recognition with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 672
  2. 2017NIMA: Neural Image Assessmentcited by 387
  3. 2019From Patches to Pictures (PaQ-2-PiQ): Mapping the Perceptual Space of Picture Qualitycited by 221
  4. 2021Efficient Visual Pretraining with Contrastive Detectioncited by 150
  5. 2020Patch-VQ: 'Patching Up' the Video Quality Problemcited by 147
  6. 2020UGC-VQA: Benchmarking Blind Video Quality Assessment for User Generated Contentcited by 140
  7. 2018Large-Scale Study of Perceptual Video Qualitycited by 127
  8. 2019YouTube UGC Dataset for Video Compression Researchcited by 124
  9. 2021RAPIQUE: Rapid and Accurate Video Quality Prediction of User Generated Contentcited by 100
  10. 2021Blindly Assess Quality of In-the-Wild Videos via Quality-aware Pre-training and Motion Perceptioncited by 97
  11. 2021Image Quality Assessment using Contrastive Learningcited by 95
  12. 2020BBAND Index: A No-Reference Banding Artifact Predictorcited by 19
  13. 2022CONVIQT: Contrastive Video Quality Estimatorcited by 19
  14. 2023Study of Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of Mobile Cloud Gaming Videoscited by 10
  15. 2016Recover Subjective Quality Scores from Noisy Measurementscited by 8
  16. 2023HDR or SDR? A Subjective and Objective Study of Scaled and Compressed Videoscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Community-Aware Assessment of Social Textual Engagement and Resonance: A Human-Centric Perspective on User-Generated Content Evaluation
  2. 2026MemeCULT-1K: Benchmarking South Asian Cultural Context and Humor Understanding of Multimodal Models
  3. 2026CultureVidBench: Benchmarking Cultural Understanding in Text-to-Video Generation
  4. 2026Seeing Beyond 8bits: Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of HDR-UGC Videos
  5. 2025Through Their Eyes: User Perceptions on Sensitive Attribute Inference of Social Media Videos by Visual Language Models
  6. 2025Culture in Action: Evaluating Text-to-Image Models through Social Activities
  7. 2025CAMP-VQA: Caption-Embedded Multimodal Perception for No-Reference Quality Assessment of Compressed Video
  8. 2023Towards Explainable In-the-Wild Video Quality Assessment: A Database and a Language-Prompted Approach