Calibration Attacks: A Comprehensive Study of Adversarial Attacks on Model Confidence
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this work, we highlight and perform a comprehensive study on calibration attacks, a form of adversarial attacks that aim to trap victim models to be heavily miscalibrated without altering their predicted labels, hence endangering the trustworthiness of the models and follow-up decision making based on their confidence. We propose four typical forms of calibration attacks: underconfidence, overconfidence, maximum miscalibration, and random confidence attacks, conducted in both black-box and white-box setups. We demonstrate that the attacks are highly effective on both convolutional and attention-based models: with a small number of queries, they seriously skew confidence without changing the predictive performance. Given the potential danger, we further investigate the effectiveness of a wide range of adversarial defence and recalibration methods, including our proposed defences specifically designed for calibration attacks to mitigate the harm. From the ECE and KS scores, we observe that there are still significant limitations in handling calibration attacks. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first dedicated study that provides a comprehensive investigation on calibration-focused attacks. We hope this study helps attract more attention to these types of attacks and hence hamper their potential serious damages. To this end, this work also provides detailed analyses to understand the characteristics of the attacks. Our code is available at https://github.com/PhenetOs/CalibrationAttack
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 50 of its 79 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jan 2024.
Builds on
50 of 79 references.
References · 50
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
- 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
- 2018A Simple Unified Framework for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samples and Adversarial Attackscited by 1,472
38 more
- 2020Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving Generalizationcited by 1,404
- 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,274
- 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,259
- 2019Learning Imbalanced Datasets with Label-Distribution-Aware Margin Losscited by 987
- 2019Square Attack: a query-efficient black-box adversarial attack via random searchcited by 682
- 2020RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmarkcited by 659
- 2017ZOO: Zeroth Order Optimization based Black-box Attacks to Deep Neural Networks without Training Substitute Modelscited by 656
- 2018Improving Transferability of Adversarial Examples with Input Diversitycited by 591
- 2019Measuring Calibration in Deep Learningcited by 443
- 2021Revisiting the Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 387
- 2019Beyond temperature scaling: Obtaining well-calibrated multiclass probabilities with Dirichlet calibrationcited by 359
- 2018Feature Denoising for Improving Adversarial Robustnesscited by 312
- 2019Verified Uncertainty Calibrationcited by 307
- 2019On Mixup Training: Improved Calibration and Predictive Uncertainty for Deep Neural Networkscited by 304
- 2020Effect of Confidence and Explanation on Accuracy and Trust Calibration in AI-Assisted Decision Makingcited by 281
- 2018Characterizing Adversarial Subspaces Using Local Intrinsic Dimensionalitycited by 280
- 2020Uncovering the Limits of Adversarial Training against Norm-Bounded Adversarial Examplescited by 275
- 2020Long-Tailed Classification by Keeping the Good and Removing the Bad Momentum Causal Effectcited by 256
- 2021Fixing Data Augmentation to Improve Adversarial Robustnesscited by 201
- 2021Data Augmentation Can Improve Robustnesscited by 193
- 2018Stochastic Activation Pruning for Robust Adversarial Defensecited by 171
- 2022Robustness and Accuracy Could Be Reconcilable by (Proper) Definitioncited by 109
- 2020Calibration of Neural Networks using Splinescited by 97
- 2020A Case for Humans-in-the-Loop: Decisions in the Presence of Erroneous Algorithmic Scorescited by 74
- 2021Boosting Adversarial Transferability through Enhanced Momentumcited by 53
- 2022Robust Calibration with Multi-domain Temperature Scalingcited by 39
- 2020Improved Trainable Calibration Method for Neural Networks on Medical Imaging Classificationcited by 37
- 2020Certifying Confidence via Randomized Smoothingcited by 36
- 2020Towards Trustworthy Predictions from Deep Neural Networks with Fast Adversarial Calibrationcited by 34
- 2022DensePure: Understanding Diffusion Models towards Adversarial Robustnesscited by 33
- 2021SpectralDefense: Detecting Adversarial Attacks on CNNs in the Fourier Domaincited by 30
- 2020Improving Calibration through the Relationship with Adversarial Robustnesscited by 26
- 2023A Diachronic Perspective on User Trust in AI under Uncertaintycited by 23
- 2021Disrupting Deep Uncertainty Estimation Without Harming Accuracycited by 19
- 2019On-manifold Adversarial Data Augmentation Improves Uncertainty Calibrationcited by 18
- 2022Adversarial Attack on Attackers: Post-Process to Mitigate Black-Box Score-Based Query Attackscited by 18
- 2022Increasing Confidence in Adversarial Robustness Evaluationscited by 12
- 2019The Threat of Adversarial Attacks on Machine Learning in Network Security -- A Surveycited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 5.
7 papers.
- 2024SMARTCAL: An Approach to Self-Aware Tool-Use Evaluation and Calibrationcited by 13
- 2025On the Robustness of Verbal Confidence of LLMs in Adversarial Attackscited by 3
- 2026Temperature Scaling Attack Disrupting Model Confidence in Federated Learningcited by 0
- 2026The Confidence Trap: Calibration Attacks for Graph Neural Networkscited by 0
- 2026LiST: Lipschitz Scaling Training for Robust and Calibrated Neural Networkscited by 0
- 2026Vision-Language Model Confidence Is Not a Property of the Answercited by 0
- 2026Jailbreaks for Black-Box Uncertainty Quantification in Large Reasoning Modelscited by 0
- 2026Jailbreaks for Black-Box Uncertainty Quantification in Large Reasoning Models28 Sep 2026
- 2026Vision-Language Model Confidence Is Not a Property of the Answer6 Aug 2026
- 2026LiST: Lipschitz Scaling Training for Robust and Calibrated Neural Networks8 Jul 2026
- 2026The Confidence Trap: Calibration Attacks for Graph Neural Networks7 Jun 2026
- 2026Temperature Scaling Attack Disrupting Model Confidence in Federated Learning6 Feb 2026
- 2025On the Robustness of Verbal Confidence of LLMs in Adversarial Attacks9 Jul 2025
- 2024SMARTCAL: An Approach to Self-Aware Tool-Use Evaluation and Calibration11 Dec 2024