The Threat of Adversarial Attacks on Machine Learning in Network Security -- A Survey
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Machine learning models have made many decision support systems to be faster, more accurate, and more efficient. However, applications of machine learning in network security face a more disproportionate threat of active adversarial attacks compared to other domains. This is because machine learning applications in network security such as malware detection, intrusion detection, and spam filtering are by themselves adversarial in nature. In what could be considered an arm's race between attackers and defenders, adversaries constantly probe machine learning systems with inputs that are explicitly designed to bypass the system and induce a wrong prediction. In this survey, we first provide a taxonomy of machine learning techniques, tasks, and depth. We then introduce a classification of machine learning in network security applications. Next, we examine various adversarial attacks against machine learning in network security and introduce two classification approaches for adversarial attacks in network security. First, we classify adversarial attacks in network security based on a taxonomy of network security applications. Secondly, we categorize adversarial attacks in network security into a problem space vs feature space dimensional classification model. We then analyze the various defenses against adversarial attacks on machine learning-based network security applications. We conclude by introducing an adversarial risk grid map and evaluating several existing adversarial attacks against machine learning in network security using the risk grid map. We also identify where each attack classification resides within the adversarial risk grid map.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 6 Nov 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 4; 2025: 1.
9 papers.
- 2021Adversarial Machine Learning In Network Intrusion Detection Domain: A Systematic Reviewcited by 8
- 2024Calibration Attacks: A Comprehensive Study of Adversarial Attacks on Model Confidencecited by 7
- 2021Know Your Model (KYM): Increasing Trust in AI and Machine Learningcited by 4
- 2024A chaotic maps-based privacy-preserving distributed deep learning for incomplete and Non-IID datasetscited by 3
- 2023Evasion Adversarial Attacks Remain Impractical Against ML-based Network Intrusion Detection Systems, Especially Dynamic Onescited by 2
- 2022Adversarial attacks and defenses on ML- and hardware-based IoT device fingerprinting and identificationcited by 1
- 2024A Novel Perturb-ability Score to Mitigate Evasion Adversarial Attacks on Flow-Based ML-NIDScited by 1
- 2025Exploring the Effect of DNN Depth on Adversarial Attacks in Network Intrusion Detection Systemscited by 1
- 2024Introducing Adaptive Continuous Adversarial Training (ACAT) to Enhance ML Robustnesscited by 0
- 2025Exploring the Effect of DNN Depth on Adversarial Attacks in Network Intrusion Detection Systems22 Oct 2025
- 2024A Novel Perturb-ability Score to Mitigate Evasion Adversarial Attacks on Flow-Based ML-NIDS11 Sep 2024
- 2024Introducing Adaptive Continuous Adversarial Training (ACAT) to Enhance ML Robustness15 Mar 2024
- 2024A chaotic maps-based privacy-preserving distributed deep learning for incomplete and Non-IID datasets15 Feb 2024
- 2024Calibration Attacks: A Comprehensive Study of Adversarial Attacks on Model Confidence5 Jan 2024
- 2023Evasion Adversarial Attacks Remain Impractical Against ML-based Network Intrusion Detection Systems, Especially Dynamic Ones8 Jun 2023
- 2022Adversarial attacks and defenses on ML- and hardware-based IoT device fingerprinting and identification30 Dec 2022
- 2021Adversarial Machine Learning In Network Intrusion Detection Domain: A Systematic Review6 Dec 2021
- 2021Know Your Model (KYM): Increasing Trust in AI and Machine Learning31 May 2021