mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Fairness Certification for Natural Language Processing and Large Language Models

arXiv 2401.01262 ↗First posted 2 Jan 2024cs.CL cs.AI cs.CYcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Natural Language Processing (NLP) plays an important role in our daily lives, particularly due to the enormous progress of Large Language Models (LLM). However, NLP has many fairness-critical use cases, e.g., as an expert system in recruitment or as an LLM-based tutor in education. Since NLP is based on human language, potentially harmful biases can diffuse into NLP systems and produce unfair results, discriminate against minorities or generate legal issues. Hence, it is important to develop a fairness certification for NLP approaches. We follow a qualitative research approach towards a fairness certification for NLP. In particular, we have reviewed a large body of literature on algorithmic fairness, and we have conducted semi-structured expert interviews with a wide range of experts from that area. We have systematically devised six fairness criteria for NLP, which can be further refined into 18 sub-categories. Our criteria offer a foundation for operationalizing and testing processes to certify fairness, both from the perspective of the auditor and the audited organization.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 75 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jan 2024.

Builds on

32 of 75 references.

References · 32

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
  3. 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,312
  4. 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,080
  5. 2020Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of "Bias" in NLPcited by 956
  6. 2016Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biasescited by 901
  7. 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 804
  8. 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 672
  9. 2017Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairnesscited by 403
  10. 2019Mitigating Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing: Literature Reviewcited by 287
  11. 2019Evaluating Gender Bias in Machine Translationcited by 249
  12. 2018A comparative study of fairness-enhancing interventions in machine learningcited by 208
20 more
  1. 2018Counterfactual Fairness in Text Classification through Robustnesscited by 151
  2. 2018Why Is My Classifier Discriminatory?cited by 143
  3. 2019On the Apparent Conflict Between Individual and Group Fairnesscited by 126
  4. 2017Natural Language Processing: State of The Art, Current Trends and Challengescited by 114
  5. 2017Racial Disparity in Natural Language Processing: A Case Study of Social Media African-American Englishcited by 71
  6. 2021Post-processing for Individual Fairnesscited by 61
  7. 2023"I'm fully who I am": Towards Centering Transgender and Non-Binary Voices to Measure Biases in Open Language Generationcited by 56
  8. 2023Who Audits the Auditors? Recommendations from a field scan of the algorithmic auditing ecosystemcited by 52
  9. 2018Residual Unfairness in Fair Machine Learning from Prejudiced Datacited by 49
  10. 2022How Different Groups Prioritize Ethical Values for Responsible AIcited by 49
  11. 2016Auditing Black-box Models for Indirect Influencecited by 41
  12. 2020SenSeI: Sensitive Set Invariance for Enforcing Individual Fairnesscited by 37
  13. 2021Unpacking the Interdependent Systems of Discrimination: Ableist Bias in NLP Systems through an Intersectional Lenscited by 30
  14. 2023On the Independence of Association Bias and Empirical Fairness in Language Modelscited by 29
  15. 2021Fairness Perceptions of Algorithmic Decision-Making: A Systematic Review of the Empirical Literaturecited by 27
  16. 2020Fairness in the Eyes of the Data: Certifying Machine-Learning Modelscited by 16
  17. 2021AI Certification: Advancing Ethical Practice by Reducing Information Asymmetriescited by 15
  18. 2023Multi-dimensional discrimination in Law and Machine Learning -- A comparative overviewcited by 15
  19. 2023Maximal Fairnesscited by 6
  20. 2017The Authority of "Fair" in Machine Learningcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.