mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Towards Faithful Explanations for Text Classification with Robustness Improvement and Explanation Guided Training

arXiv 2312.17591 ↗First posted 29 Dec 2023cs.CLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Feature attribution methods highlight the important input tokens as explanations to model predictions, which have been widely applied to deep neural networks towards trustworthy AI. However, recent works show that explanations provided by these methods face challenges of being faithful and robust. In this paper, we propose a method with Robustness improvement and Explanation Guided training towards more faithful EXplanations (REGEX) for text classification. First, we improve model robustness by input gradient regularization technique and virtual adversarial training. Secondly, we use salient ranking to mask noisy tokens and maximize the similarity between model attention and feature attribution, which can be seen as a self-training procedure without importing other external information. We conduct extensive experiments on six datasets with five attribution methods, and also evaluate the faithfulness in the out-of-domain setting. The results show that REGEX improves fidelity metrics of explanations in all settings and further achieves consistent gains based on two randomization tests. Moreover, we show that using highlight explanations produced by REGEX to train select-then-predict models results in comparable task performance to the end-to-end method.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 57 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Dec 2023.

Builds on

57 of 66 references.

References · 57

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  3. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  4. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  5. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  6. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
  7. 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,293
  8. 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
  9. 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,097
  10. 2020Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckListcited by 979
  11. 2017Virtual Adversarial Training: A Regularization Method for Supervised and Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 918
  12. 2016The Mythos of Model Interpretabilitycited by 716
38 more
  1. 2020Towards Faithfully Interpretable NLP Systems: How should we define and evaluate faithfulness?cited by 590
  2. 2019ERASER: A Benchmark to Evaluate Rationalized NLP Modelscited by 523
  3. 2017Interpretation of Neural Networks is Fragilecited by 443
  4. 2019Is Attention Interpretable?cited by 387
  5. 2017The (Un)reliability of saliency methodscited by 331
  6. 2018On the Robustness of Interpretability Methodscited by 310
  7. 2019On the (In)fidelity and Sensitivity for Explanationscited by 309
  8. 2016Not Just a Black Box: Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 295
  9. 2020Pretrained Transformers Improve Out-of-Distribution Robustnesscited by 293
  10. 2019SMART: Robust and Efficient Fine-Tuning for Pre-trained Natural Language Models through Principled Regularized Optimizationcited by 253
  11. 2017Improving the Adversarial Robustness and Interpretability of Deep Neural Networks by Regularizing their Input Gradientscited by 236
  12. 2020Measuring Association Between Labels and Free-Text Rationalescited by 159
  13. 2020A Diagnostic Study of Explainability Techniques for Text Classificationcited by 158
  14. 2019Interpretations are useful: penalizing explanations to align neural networks with prior knowledgecited by 144
  15. 2020Learning to Faithfully Rationalize by Constructioncited by 113
  16. 2019Fooling Neural Network Interpretations via Adversarial Model Manipulationcited by 112
  17. 2021Measure and Improve Robustness in NLP Models: A Surveycited by 107
  18. 2023Tracr: Compiled Transformers as a Laboratory for Interpretabilitycited by 99
  19. 2021When Can Models Learn From Explanations? A Formal Framework for Understanding the Roles of Explanation Datacited by 75
  20. 2019Make Up Your Mind! Adversarial Generation of Inconsistent Natural Language Explanationscited by 71
  21. 2019Incorporating Priors with Feature Attribution on Text Classificationcited by 68
  22. 2021Improving Deep Learning Interpretability by Saliency Guided Trainingcited by 68
  23. 2021"Will You Find These Shortcuts?" A Protocol for Evaluating the Faithfulness of Input Salience Methods for Text Classificationcited by 66
  24. 2015Distributional Smoothing with Virtual Adversarial Trainingcited by 61
  25. 2022Post hoc Explanations may be Ineffective for Detecting Unknown Spurious Correlationcited by 59
  26. 2016Investigating the influence of noise and distractors on the interpretation of neural networkscited by 54
  27. 2020Evaluations and Methods for Explanation through Robustness Analysiscited by 51
  28. 2019Can I Trust the Explainer? Verifying Post-hoc Explanatory Methodscited by 37
  29. 2021Evaluating Saliency Methods for Neural Language Modelscited by 37
  30. 2021Is Sparse Attention more Interpretable?cited by 31
  31. 2021Perturbing Inputs for Fragile Interpretations in Deep Natural Language Processingcited by 30
  32. 2021Supervising Model Attention with Human Explanations for Robust Natural Language Inferencecited by 29
  33. 2021Improving the Faithfulness of Attention-based Explanations with Task-specific Information for Text Classificationcited by 29
  34. 2021Influence Tuning: Demoting Spurious Correlations via Instance Attribution and Instance-Driven Updatescited by 27
  35. 2021Robust Models Are More Interpretable Because Attributions Look Normalcited by 21
  36. 2022An Empirical Study on Explanations in Out-of-Domain Settingscited by 21
  37. 2021Can Explanations Be Useful for Calibrating Black Box Models?cited by 20
  38. 2021Logic Traps in Evaluating Attribution Scorescited by 18

50 most cited of 57 All 57 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 1.

4 papers.