Towards Faithful Explanations for Text Classification with Robustness Improvement and Explanation Guided Training
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Feature attribution methods highlight the important input tokens as explanations to model predictions, which have been widely applied to deep neural networks towards trustworthy AI. However, recent works show that explanations provided by these methods face challenges of being faithful and robust. In this paper, we propose a method with Robustness improvement and Explanation Guided training towards more faithful EXplanations (REGEX) for text classification. First, we improve model robustness by input gradient regularization technique and virtual adversarial training. Secondly, we use salient ranking to mask noisy tokens and maximize the similarity between model attention and feature attribution, which can be seen as a self-training procedure without importing other external information. We conduct extensive experiments on six datasets with five attribution methods, and also evaluate the faithfulness in the out-of-domain setting. The results show that REGEX improves fidelity metrics of explanations in all settings and further achieves consistent gains based on two randomization tests. Moreover, we show that using highlight explanations produced by REGEX to train select-then-predict models results in comparable task performance to the end-to-end method.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 57 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Dec 2023.
Builds on
57 of 66 references.
References · 57
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
- 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,293
- 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
- 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,097
- 2020Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckListcited by 979
- 2017Virtual Adversarial Training: A Regularization Method for Supervised and Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 918
- 2016The Mythos of Model Interpretabilitycited by 716
38 more
- 2020Towards Faithfully Interpretable NLP Systems: How should we define and evaluate faithfulness?cited by 590
- 2019ERASER: A Benchmark to Evaluate Rationalized NLP Modelscited by 523
- 2017Interpretation of Neural Networks is Fragilecited by 443
- 2019Is Attention Interpretable?cited by 387
- 2017The (Un)reliability of saliency methodscited by 331
- 2018On the Robustness of Interpretability Methodscited by 310
- 2019On the (In)fidelity and Sensitivity for Explanationscited by 309
- 2016Not Just a Black Box: Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 295
- 2020Pretrained Transformers Improve Out-of-Distribution Robustnesscited by 293
- 2019SMART: Robust and Efficient Fine-Tuning for Pre-trained Natural Language Models through Principled Regularized Optimizationcited by 253
- 2017Improving the Adversarial Robustness and Interpretability of Deep Neural Networks by Regularizing their Input Gradientscited by 236
- 2020Measuring Association Between Labels and Free-Text Rationalescited by 159
- 2020A Diagnostic Study of Explainability Techniques for Text Classificationcited by 158
- 2019Interpretations are useful: penalizing explanations to align neural networks with prior knowledgecited by 144
- 2020Learning to Faithfully Rationalize by Constructioncited by 113
- 2019Fooling Neural Network Interpretations via Adversarial Model Manipulationcited by 112
- 2021Measure and Improve Robustness in NLP Models: A Surveycited by 107
- 2023Tracr: Compiled Transformers as a Laboratory for Interpretabilitycited by 99
- 2021When Can Models Learn From Explanations? A Formal Framework for Understanding the Roles of Explanation Datacited by 75
- 2019Make Up Your Mind! Adversarial Generation of Inconsistent Natural Language Explanationscited by 71
- 2019Incorporating Priors with Feature Attribution on Text Classificationcited by 68
- 2021Improving Deep Learning Interpretability by Saliency Guided Trainingcited by 68
- 2021"Will You Find These Shortcuts?" A Protocol for Evaluating the Faithfulness of Input Salience Methods for Text Classificationcited by 66
- 2015Distributional Smoothing with Virtual Adversarial Trainingcited by 61
- 2022Post hoc Explanations may be Ineffective for Detecting Unknown Spurious Correlationcited by 59
- 2016Investigating the influence of noise and distractors on the interpretation of neural networkscited by 54
- 2020Evaluations and Methods for Explanation through Robustness Analysiscited by 51
- 2019Can I Trust the Explainer? Verifying Post-hoc Explanatory Methodscited by 37
- 2021Evaluating Saliency Methods for Neural Language Modelscited by 37
- 2021Is Sparse Attention more Interpretable?cited by 31
- 2021Perturbing Inputs for Fragile Interpretations in Deep Natural Language Processingcited by 30
- 2021Supervising Model Attention with Human Explanations for Robust Natural Language Inferencecited by 29
- 2021Improving the Faithfulness of Attention-based Explanations with Task-specific Information for Text Classificationcited by 29
- 2021Influence Tuning: Demoting Spurious Correlations via Instance Attribution and Instance-Driven Updatescited by 27
- 2021Robust Models Are More Interpretable Because Attributions Look Normalcited by 21
- 2022An Empirical Study on Explanations in Out-of-Domain Settingscited by 21
- 2021Can Explanations Be Useful for Calibrating Black Box Models?cited by 20
- 2021Logic Traps in Evaluating Attribution Scorescited by 18
50 most cited of 57 All 57 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 1.
4 papers.
- 2024An Unsupervised Approach to Achieve Supervised-Level Explainability in Healthcare Recordscited by 12
- 2024Normalized AOPC: Fixing Misleading Faithfulness Metrics for Feature Attribution Explainabilitycited by 10
- 2024The Effect of Model Size on LLM Post-hoc Explainability via LIMEcited by 4
- 2025Hybrid Attribution Priors for Explainable and Robust Model Trainingcited by 0
- 2025Hybrid Attribution Priors for Explainable and Robust Model Training9 Dec 2025
- 2024Normalized AOPC: Fixing Misleading Faithfulness Metrics for Feature Attribution Explainability15 Aug 2024
- 2024An Unsupervised Approach to Achieve Supervised-Level Explainability in Healthcare Records13 Jun 2024
- 2024The Effect of Model Size on LLM Post-hoc Explainability via LIME8 May 2024