mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Interactive Counterfactual Exploration of Algorithmic Harms in Recommender Systems

arXiv 2409.06916 ↗First posted 10 Sep 2024cs.IR cs.AI cs.HCcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recommender systems have become integral to digital experiences, shaping user interactions and preferences across various platforms. Despite their widespread use, these systems often suffer from algorithmic biases that can lead to unfair and unsatisfactory user experiences. This study introduces an interactive tool designed to help users comprehend and explore the impacts of algorithmic harms in recommender systems. By leveraging visualizations, counterfactual explanations, and interactive modules, the tool allows users to investigate how biases such as miscalibration, stereotypes, and filter bubbles affect their recommendations. Informed by in-depth user interviews, this tool benefits both general users and researchers by increasing transparency and offering personalized impact assessments, ultimately fostering a better understanding of algorithmic biases and contributing to more equitable recommendation outcomes. This work provides valuable insights for future research and practical applications in mitigating bias and enhancing fairness in machine learning algorithms.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Sep 2024.

Builds on

15 of 28 references.

References · 15

  1. 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,841
  2. 2018AI Fairness 360: An Extensible Toolkit for Detecting, Understanding, and Mitigating Unwanted Algorithmic Biascited by 319
  3. 2019The What-If Tool: Interactive Probing of Machine Learning Modelscited by 207
  4. 2019FairVis: Visual Analytics for Discovering Intersectional Bias in Machine Learningcited by 93
  5. 2019FairSight: Visual Analytics for Fairness in Decision Makingcited by 59
  6. 2020Fast and Eager k-Medoids Clustering: O(k) Runtime Improvement of the PAM, CLARA, and CLARANS Algorithmscited by 35
  7. 2020The Connection Between Popularity Bias, Calibration, and Fairness in Recommendationcited by 35
  8. 2022D-BIAS: A Causality-Based Human-in-the-Loop System for Tackling Algorithmic Biascited by 18
  9. 2020Visual Analysis of Discrimination in Machine Learningcited by 15
  10. 2022Towards Involving End-users in Interactive Human-in-the-loop AI Fairnesscited by 12
  11. 2022DASH: Visual Analytics for Debiasing Image Classification via User-Driven Synthetic Data Augmentationcited by 7
  12. 2021User Acceptance of Gender Stereotypes in Automated Career Recommendationscited by 4
3 more
  1. 2022BiaScope: Visual Unfairness Diagnosis for Graph Embeddingscited by 3
  2. 2023FairCompass: Operationalising Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 3
  3. 2023Break Out of a Pigeonhole: A Unified Framework for Examining Miscalibration, Bias, and Stereotype in Recommender Systemscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.