mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Conditional Variational Autoencoder for Sign Language Translation with Cross-Modal Alignment

arXiv 2312.15645 ↗First posted 25 Dec 2023cs.CLcited by 22

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Sign language translation (SLT) aims to convert continuous sign language videos into textual sentences. As a typical multi-modal task, there exists an inherent modality gap between sign language videos and spoken language text, which makes the cross-modal alignment between visual and textual modalities crucial. However, previous studies tend to rely on an intermediate sign gloss representation to help alleviate the cross-modal problem thereby neglecting the alignment across modalities that may lead to compromised results. To address this issue, we propose a novel framework based on Conditional Variational autoencoder for SLT (CV-SLT) that facilitates direct and sufficient cross-modal alignment between sign language videos and spoken language text. Specifically, our CV-SLT consists of two paths with two Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergences to regularize the outputs of the encoder and decoder, respectively. In the prior path, the model solely relies on visual information to predict the target text; whereas in the posterior path, it simultaneously encodes visual information and textual knowledge to reconstruct the target text. The first KL divergence optimizes the conditional variational autoencoder and regularizes the encoder outputs, while the second KL divergence performs a self-distillation from the posterior path to the prior path, ensuring the consistency of decoder outputs. We further enhance the integration of textual information to the posterior path by employing a shared Attention Residual Gaussian Distribution (ARGD), which considers the textual information in the posterior path as a residual component relative to the prior path. Extensive experiments conducted on public datasets (PHOENIX14T and CSL-daily) demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework, achieving new state-of-the-art results while significantly alleviating the cross-modal representation discrepancy.

Key facts. Cited by 22 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Dec 2023.

Builds on

16 of 34 references.

References · 16

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2020NVAE: A Deep Hierarchical Variational Autoencodercited by 635
  3. 2015Generating Sentences from a Continuous Spacecited by 607
  4. 2015Importance Weighted Autoencoderscited by 454
  5. 2020Sign Language Transformers: Joint End-to-end Sign Language Recognition and Translationcited by 254
  6. 2021Improving Sign Language Translation with Monolingual Data by Sign Back-Translationcited by 177
  7. 2022Two-Stream Network for Sign Language Recognition and Translationcited by 122
  8. 2020TSPNet: Hierarchical Feature Learning via Temporal Semantic Pyramid for Sign Language Translationcited by 75
  9. 2020Multi-channel Transformers for Multi-articulatory Sign Language Translationcited by 71
  10. 2019Latent-Variable Non-Autoregressive Neural Machine Translation with Deterministic Inference Using a Delta Posteriorcited by 58
  11. 2023CVT-SLR: Contrastive Visual-Textual Transformation for Sign Language Recognition with Variational Alignmentcited by 44
  12. 2016Variational Neural Machine Translationcited by 35
4 more
  1. 2018Variational Recurrent Neural Machine Translationcited by 23
  2. 2020A Batch Normalized Inference Network Keeps the KL Vanishing Awaycited by 20
  3. 2022textitlatent-GLAT: Glancing at Latent Variables for Parallel Text Generationcited by 20
  4. 2021Regularizing Variational Autoencoder with Diversity and Uncertainty Awarenesscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 9; 2026: 9.

22 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2025Uni-Sign: Toward Unified Sign Language Understanding at Scalecited by 55
  2. 2024C2RL: Content and Context Representation Learning for Gloss-free Sign Language Translation and Retrievalcited by 23
  3. 2025Geo-Sign: Hyperbolic Contrastive Regularisation for Geometrically Aware Sign Language Translationcited by 11
  4. 2024Linguistics-Vision Monotonic Consistent Network for Sign Language Productioncited by 5
  5. 2024SCOPE: Sign Language Contextual Processing with Embedding from LLMscited by 4
  6. 2025Dual-view Spatio-Temporal Feature Fusion with CNN-Transformer Hybrid Network for Chinese Isolated Sign Language Recognitioncited by 2
  7. 2025RVLF: A Reinforcing Vision-Language Framework for Gloss-Free Sign Language Translationcited by 2
  8. 2026CNSL-bench: Benchmarking the Sign Language Understanding Capabilities of MLLMs on Chinese National Sign Languagecited by 2
  9. 2026Sign Language Question Answering: A New Task, Benchmark, and Baseline for Sign Language Understandingcited by 2
  10. 2024DiffSLT: Enhancing Diversity in Sign Language Translation via Diffusion Modelcited by 1
  11. 2025SAGE: Segment-Aware Gloss-Free Encoding for Token-Efficient Sign Language Translationcited by 1
  12. 2025SignBind-LLM: Multi-Stage Modality Fusion for Sign Language Translationcited by 1
10 more
  1. 2026Think in Latent Thoughts: A New Paradigm for Gloss-Free Sign Language Translationcited by 1
  2. 2025Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning with Reliability-Guaranteed Sequence Modelingcited by 0
  3. 2025StgcDiff: Spatial-Temporal Graph Condition Diffusion for Sign Language Transition Generationcited by 0
  4. 2025Amplifying Prominent Representations in Multimodal Learning via Variational Dirichlet Processcited by 0
  5. 2026SignDPO: Multi-level Direct Preference Optimisation for Skeleton-based Gloss-free Sign Language Translationcited by 0
  6. 2026Towards Multi-View Sign Language Understanding: A Benchmark Dataset and Baselinecited by 0
  7. 2026Selective Contrastive Learning For Gloss Free Sign Language Translationcited by 0
  8. 2026Sign-Language Datasets at Scale: A Comprehensive Survey on Resources, Benchmarks, and Annotation Standardscited by 0
  9. 2026Q-BridgeNet: A Quantization Network for Cross-Lingual Sign Language Translationcited by 0
  10. 2026Rethinking Sign Language Translation: The Impact of Signer Dependence on Model Evaluationcited by 0