Conservative Exploration for Policy Optimization via Off-Policy Policy Evaluation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A precondition for the deployment of a Reinforcement Learning agent to a real-world system is to provide guarantees on the learning process. While a learning algorithm will eventually converge to a good policy, there are no guarantees on the performance of the exploratory policies. We study the problem of conservative exploration, where the learner must at least be able to guarantee its performance is at least as good as a baseline policy. We propose the first conservative provably efficient model-free algorithm for policy optimization in continuous finite-horizon problems. We leverage importance sampling techniques to counterfactually evaluate the conservative condition from the data self-generated by the algorithm. We derive a regret bound and show that (w.h.p.) the conservative constraint is never violated during learning. Finally, we leverage these insights to build a general schema for conservative exploration in DeepRL via off-policy policy evaluation techniques. We show empirically the effectiveness of our methods.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 51 of its 78 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Dec 2023.
Builds on
51 of 78 references.
References · 51
- 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,885
- 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,407
- 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,274
- 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,580
- 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,417
- 2020Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,809
- 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learningcited by 1,745
- 2017Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 983
- 2017Rainbow: Combining Improvements in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 786
- 2016Deep Exploration via Bootstrapped DQNcited by 527
- 2018Is Q-learning Provably Efficient?cited by 487
- 2018Reward Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 417
38 more
- 2017Safe Model-based Reinforcement Learning with Stability Guaranteescited by 366
- 2015Doubly Robust Off-policy Value Evaluation for Reinforcement Learningcited by 339
- 2020Responsive Safety in Reinforcement Learning by PID Lagrangian Methodscited by 316
- 2018A Lyapunov-based Approach to Safe Reinforcement Learningcited by 297
- 2016Data-Efficient Off-Policy Policy Evaluation for Reinforcement Learningcited by 286
- 2019DualDICE: Behavior-Agnostic Estimation of Discounted Stationary Distribution Correctionscited by 254
- 2019Batch Policy Learning under Constraintscited by 244
- 2018Breaking the Curse of Horizon: Infinite-Horizon Off-Policy Estimationcited by 227
- 2020Nearly Minimax Optimal Reinforcement Learning for Linear Mixture Markov Decision Processescited by 200
- 2020Exploration-Exploitation in Constrained MDPscited by 149
- 2017Safe Policy Improvement with Baseline Bootstrappingcited by 144
- 2018More Robust Doubly Robust Off-policy Evaluationcited by 141
- 2020Provably Efficient Safe Exploration via Primal-Dual Policy Optimizationcited by 134
- 2020GenDICE: Generalized Offline Estimation of Stationary Valuescited by 122
- 2019Empirical Study of Off-Policy Policy Evaluation for Reinforcement Learningcited by 121
- 2020Minimax-Optimal Off-Policy Evaluation with Linear Function Approximationcited by 120
- 2020Conservative Safety Critics for Explorationcited by 113
- 2016Averaged-DQN: Variance Reduction and Stabilization for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 106
- 2019Linear Stochastic Bandits Under Safety Constraintscited by 90
- 2020Safe Reinforcement Learning via Curriculum Inductioncited by 74
- 2020GradientDICE: Rethinking Generalized Offline Estimation of Stationary Valuescited by 70
- 2020Stochastic Bandits with Linear Constraintscited by 68
- 2020CoinDICE: Off-Policy Confidence Interval Estimationcited by 64
- 2016Conservative Banditscited by 59
- 2016Conservative Contextual Linear Banditscited by 57
- 2015Bayesian Incentive-Compatible Bandit Explorationcited by 53
- 2016Safe Policy Improvement by Minimizing Robust Baseline Regretcited by 53
- 2016Q(λ) with Off-Policy Correctionscited by 48
- 2021Universal Off-Policy Evaluationcited by 43
- 2019Understanding the Curse of Horizon in Off-Policy Evaluation via Conditional Importance Samplingcited by 37
- 2020Accountable Off-Policy Evaluation With Kernel Bellman Statisticscited by 36
- 2020Statistical Bootstrapping for Uncertainty Estimation in Off-Policy Evaluationcited by 28
- 2020Conservative Exploration in Reinforcement Learningcited by 20
- 2020Improved Algorithms for Conservative Exploration in Banditscited by 16
- 2021Non-asymptotic Confidence Intervals of Off-policy Evaluation: Primal and Dual Boundscited by 11
- 2020A One-Size-Fits-All Solution to Conservative Bandit Problemscited by 5
- 2018Conservative Exploration using Interleavingcited by 4
- 2019Contextual Combinatorial Conservative Banditscited by 4
50 most cited of 51 All 51 (JSON)
Built on by
Not cited yet.