Learning Fair Policies for Multi-stage Selection Problems from Observational Data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider the problem of learning fair policies for multi-stage selection problems from observational data. This problem arises in several high-stakes domains such as company hiring, loan approval, or bail decisions where outcomes (e.g., career success, loan repayment, recidivism) are only observed for those selected. We propose a multi-stage framework that can be augmented with various fairness constraints, such as demographic parity or equal opportunity. This problem is a highly intractable infinite chance-constrained program involving the unknown joint distribution of covariates and outcomes. Motivated by the potential impact of selection decisions on people's lives and livelihoods, we propose to focus on interpretable linear selection rules. Leveraging tools from causal inference and sample average approximation, we obtain an asymptotically consistent solution to this selection problem by solving a mixed binary conic optimization problem, which can be solved using standard off-the-shelf solvers. We conduct extensive computational experiments on a variety of datasets adapted from the UCI repository on which we show that our proposed approaches can achieve an 11.6% improvement in precision and a 38% reduction in the measure of unfairness compared to the existing selection policy.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Dec 2023.
Builds on
25 of 52 references.
References · 25
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
- 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
- 2017On Fairness and Calibrationcited by 406
- 2017Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairnesscited by 402
- 2016Fairness Beyond Disparate Treatment & Disparate Impact: Learning Classification without Disparate Mistreatmentcited by 368
- 2020Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 194
- 2017A Convex Framework for Fair Regressioncited by 147
- 2017Fair Inference On Outcomescited by 143
- 2020Robust Fairness under Covariate Shiftcited by 58
- 2019Recovering from Biased Data: Can Fairness Constraints Improve Accuracy?cited by 50
- 2018Residual Unfairness in Fair Machine Learning from Prejudiced Datacited by 49
13 more
- 2020A Distributionally Robust Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 43
- 2019Fairness in Algorithmic Decision Making: An Excursion Through the Lens of Causalitycited by 33
- 2021Mixed-Integer Optimization with Constraint Learningcited by 30
- 2018Selection Problems in the Presence of Implicit Biascited by 29
- 2020Interventions for Ranking in the Presence of Implicit Biascited by 27
- 2020The Importance of Modeling Data Missingness in Algorithmic Fairness: A Causal Perspectivecited by 17
- 2020Improving Fairness and Privacy in Selection Problemscited by 16
- 2021Fair Sequential Selection Using Supervised Learning Modelscited by 16
- 2021Wasserstein Robust Classification with Fairness Constraintscited by 10
- 2021Learning Optimal Prescriptive Trees from Observational Datacited by 10
- 2020Unbiased Subdata Selection for Fair Classification: A Unified Framework and Scalable Algorithmscited by 9
- 2019The Price of Local Fairness in Multistage Selectioncited by 8
- 2022Social Bias Meets Data Bias: The Impacts of Labeling and Measurement Errors on Fairness Criteriacited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
- 2025A Bayesian Model for Multi-stage Censoringcited by 0
- 2025A Bayesian Model for Multi-stage Censoring12 Nov 2025