The Price of Local Fairness in Multistage Selection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The rise of algorithmic decision making led to active researches on how to define and guarantee fairness, mostly focusing on one-shot decision making. In several important applications such as hiring, however, decisions are made in multiple stage with additional information at each stage. In such cases, fairness issues remain poorly understood. In this paper we study fairness in k-stage selection problems where additional features are observed at every stage. We first introduce two fairness notions, local (per stage) and global (final stage) fairness, that extend the classical fairness notions to the k-stage setting. We propose a simple model based on a probabilistic formulation and show that the locally and globally fair selections that maximize precision can be computed via a linear program. We then define the price of local fairness to measure the loss of precision induced by local constraints; and investigate theoretically and empirically this quantity. In particular, our experiments show that the price of local fairness is generally smaller when the sensitive attribute is observed at the first stage; but globally fair selections are more locally fair when the sensitive attribute is observed at the second stage---hence in both cases it is often possible to have a selection that has a small price of local fairness and is close to locally fair.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 15 Jun 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
8 papers.
- 2021Achieving Counterfactual Fairness for Causal Banditcited by 15
- 2022Cascaded Debiasing: Studying the Cumulative Effect of Multiple Fairness-Enhancing Interventionscited by 6
- 2021Precarity: Modeling the Long Term Effects of Compounded Decisions on Individual Instabilitycited by 5
- 2021Fairness Through Counterfactual Utilitiescited by 1
- 2021Fair Decision-Making for Food Inspectionscited by 1
- 2023Towards Fair and Explainable AI using a Human-Centered AI Approachcited by 1
- 2023Learning Fair Policies for Multi-stage Selection Problems from Observational Datacited by 1
- 2026Beyond Outcome Gaps: Process-Aware Fairness Diagnosis for LLM-based Multi-Agent Decision Systemscited by 0
- 2026Beyond Outcome Gaps: Process-Aware Fairness Diagnosis for LLM-based Multi-Agent Decision Systems2 Sep 2026
- 2023Learning Fair Policies for Multi-stage Selection Problems from Observational Data20 Dec 2023
- 2023Towards Fair and Explainable AI using a Human-Centered AI Approach12 Jun 2023
- 2022Cascaded Debiasing: Studying the Cumulative Effect of Multiple Fairness-Enhancing Interventions8 Feb 2022
- 2021Achieving Counterfactual Fairness for Causal Bandit21 Sep 2021
- 2021Fair Decision-Making for Food Inspections12 Aug 2021
- 2021Fairness Through Counterfactual Utilities11 Aug 2021
- 2021Precarity: Modeling the Long Term Effects of Compounded Decisions on Individual Instability24 Apr 2021