Unbiased Subdata Selection for Fair Classification: A Unified Framework and Scalable Algorithms
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As an important problem in modern data analytics, classification has witnessed varieties of applications from different domains. Different from conventional classification approaches, fair classification concerns the issues of unintentional biases against the sensitive features (e.g., gender, race). Due to high nonconvexity of fairness measures, existing methods are often unable to model exact fairness, which can cause inferior fair classification outcomes. This paper fills the gap by developing a novel unified framework to jointly optimize accuracy and fairness. The proposed framework is versatile and can incorporate different fairness measures studied in literature precisely as well as can be applicable to many classifiers including deep classification models. Specifically, in this paper, we first prove Fisher consistency of the proposed framework. We then show that many classification models within this framework can be recast as mixed-integer convex programs, which can be solved effectively by off-the-shelf solvers when the instance sizes are moderate and can be used as benchmarks to compare the efficiency of approximation algorithms. We prove that in the proposed framework, when the classification outcomes are known, the resulting problem, termed "unbiased subdata selection," is strongly polynomial-solvable and can be used to enhance the classification fairness by selecting more representative data points. This motivates us to develop an iterative refining strategy (IRS) to solve the large-scale instances, where we improve the classification accuracy and conduct the unbiased subdata selection in an alternating fashion. We study the convergence property of IRS and derive its approximation bound. More broadly, this framework can be leveraged to improve classification models with unbalanced data by taking F1 score into consideration.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 Dec 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 4; 2023: 2; 2024: 2.
9 papers.
- 2022Beyond Adult and COMPAS: Fairness in Multi-Class Predictioncited by 16
- 2022Blackbox Post-Processing for Multiclass Fairnesscited by 14
- 2022Fair Generalized Linear Models with a Convex Penaltycited by 11
- 2021Wasserstein Robust Classification with Fairness Constraintscited by 10
- 2022Optimal Decision Diagrams for Classificationcited by 10
- 2023Learning Optimal Fair Scoring Systems for Multi-Class Classificationcited by 8
- 2023Learning Fair Policies for Multi-stage Selection Problems from Observational Datacited by 1
- 2024Fair and Accurate Regression: Strong Formulations and Algorithmscited by 1
- 2024Fairness Risks for Group-conditionally Missing Demographicscited by 0
- 2024Fair and Accurate Regression: Strong Formulations and Algorithms22 Dec 2024
- 2024Fairness Risks for Group-conditionally Missing Demographics20 Feb 2024
- 2023Learning Fair Policies for Multi-stage Selection Problems from Observational Data20 Dec 2023
- 2023Learning Optimal Fair Scoring Systems for Multi-Class Classification11 Apr 2023
- 2022Fair Generalized Linear Models with a Convex Penalty18 Jun 2022
- 2022Beyond Adult and COMPAS: Fairness in Multi-Class Prediction15 Jun 2022
- 2022Optimal Decision Diagrams for Classification28 May 2022
- 2022Blackbox Post-Processing for Multiclass Fairness12 Jan 2022
- 2021Wasserstein Robust Classification with Fairness Constraints11 Mar 2021