Detecting Machine-Generated Long-Form Content with Latent-Space Variables
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The increasing capability of large language models (LLMs) to generate fluent long-form texts is presenting new challenges in distinguishing machine-generated outputs from human-written ones, which is crucial for ensuring authenticity and trustworthiness of expressions. Existing zero-shot detectors primarily focus on token-level distributions, which are vulnerable to real-world domain shifts, including different prompting and decoding strategies, and adversarial attacks. We propose a more robust method that incorporates abstract elements, such as event transitions, as key deciding factors to detect machine versus human texts by training a latent-space model on sequences of events or topics derived from human-written texts. In three different domains, machine-generated texts, which are originally inseparable from human texts on the token level, can be better distinguished with our latent-space model, leading to a 31% improvement over strong baselines such as DetectGPT. Our analysis further reveals that, unlike humans, modern LLMs like GPT-4 generate event triggers and their transitions differently, an inherent disparity that helps our method to robustly detect machine-generated texts.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Oct 2024.
Builds on
32 of 53 references.
References · 32
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
- 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,777
- 2018Don't Give Me the Details, Just the Summary! Topic-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks for Extreme Summarizationcited by 1,317
- 2019PubMedQA: A Dataset for Biomedical Research Question Answeringcited by 1,288
- 2018Hierarchical Neural Story Generationcited by 1,193
- 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 726
- 2015Generating Sentences from a Continuous Spacecited by 612
- 2019Defending Against Neural Fake Newscited by 559
- 2019Release Strategies and the Social Impacts of Language Modelscited by 513
- 2019GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Textcited by 496
- 2023Can AI-Generated Text be Reliably Detected?cited by 386
20 more
- 2023Fast-DetectGPT: Efficient Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Conditional Probability Curvaturecited by 287
- 2024Spotting LLMs With Binoculars: Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 263
- 2018Plan-And-Write: Towards Better Automatic Storytellingcited by 234
- 2023DetectLLM: Leveraging Log Rank Information for Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 210
- 2022Re3: Generating Longer Stories With Recursive Reprompting and Revisioncited by 193
- 2023RADAR: Robust AI-Text Detection via Adversarial Learningcited by 190
- 2023GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writerscited by 178
- 2023The Science of Detecting LLM-Generated Textscited by 128
- 2020MAVEN: A Massive General Domain Event Detection Datasetcited by 104
- 2024Are Large Language Models Capable of Generating Human-Level Narratives?cited by 79
- 2023A Survey on Detection of LLMs-Generated Contentcited by 71
- 2020Limitations of Autoregressive Models and Their Alternativescited by 55
- 2023ConDA: Contrastive Domain Adaptation for AI-generated Text Detectioncited by 37
- 2023HowkGPT: Investigating the Detection of ChatGPT-generated University Student Homework through Context-Aware Perplexity Analysiscited by 30
- 2024Stumbling Blocks: Stress Testing the Robustness of Machine-Generated Text Detectors Under Attackscited by 26
- 2022Zero-shot Sonnet Generation with Discourse-level Planning and Aesthetics Featurescited by 25
- 2022Model Criticism for Long-Form Text Generationcited by 21
- 2023The Devil is in the Details: On the Pitfalls of Event Extraction Evaluationcited by 19
- 2023Assaying on the Robustness of Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detectorscited by 8
- 2023BBScore: A Brownian Bridge Based Metric for Assessing Text Coherencecited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.