mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Convex Landscape of Neural Networks: Characterizing Global Optima and Stationary Points via Lasso Models

arXiv 2312.12657 ↗First posted 19 Dec 2023cs.LG cs.AI math.OCcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Due to the non-convex nature of training Deep Neural Network (DNN) models, their effectiveness relies on the use of non-convex optimization heuristics. Traditional methods for training DNNs often require costly empirical methods to produce successful models and do not have a clear theoretical foundation. In this study, we examine the use of convex optimization theory and sparse recovery models to refine the training process of neural networks and provide a better interpretation of their optimal weights. We focus on training two-layer neural networks with piecewise linear activations and demonstrate that they can be formulated as a finite-dimensional convex program. These programs include a regularization term that promotes sparsity, which constitutes a variant of group Lasso. We first utilize semi-infinite programming theory to prove strong duality for finite width neural networks and then we express these architectures equivalently as high dimensional convex sparse recovery models. Remarkably, the worst-case complexity to solve the convex program is polynomial in the number of samples and number of neurons when the rank of the data matrix is bounded, which is the case in convolutional networks. To extend our method to training data of arbitrary rank, we develop a novel polynomial-time approximation scheme based on zonotope subsampling that comes with a guaranteed approximation ratio. We also show that all the stationary of the nonconvex training objective can be characterized as the global optimum of a subsampled convex program. Our convex models can be trained using standard convex solvers without resorting to heuristics or extensive hyper-parameter tuning unlike non-convex methods. Through extensive numerical experiments, we show that convex models can outperform traditional non-convex methods and are not sensitive to optimizer hyperparameters.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 83 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Dec 2023.

Builds on

35 of 83 references.

References · 35

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
  3. 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,597
  4. 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,479
  5. 2016CVXPY: A Python-Embedded Modeling Language for Convex Optimizationcited by 633
  6. 2019Implicit Regularization in Deep Matrix Factorizationcited by 402
  7. 2014In Search of the Real Inductive Bias: On the Role of Implicit Regularization in Deep Learningcited by 339
  8. 2014Breaking the Curse of Dimensionality with Convex Neural Networkscited by 329
  9. 2017Implicit Regularization in Matrix Factorizationcited by 318
  10. 2020Kernel and Rich Regimes in Overparametrized Modelscited by 302
  11. 2020Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent for Wide Two-layer Neural Networks Trained with the Logistic Losscited by 267
  12. 2016Understanding Deep Neural Networks with Rectified Linear Unitscited by 253
23 more
  1. 2018Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Linear Convolutional Networkscited by 251
  2. 2017A Rewriting System for Convex Optimization Problemscited by 178
  3. 2020Implicit Regularization in Deep Learning May Not Be Explainable by Normscited by 118
  4. 2019How do infinite width bounded norm networks look in function space?cited by 105
  5. 2020Neural Networks are Convex Regularizers: Exact Polynomial-time Convex Optimization Formulations for Two-layer Networkscited by 96
  6. 2019Harnessing the Power of Infinitely Wide Deep Nets on Small-data Taskscited by 87
  7. 2020Implicit Bias in Deep Linear Classification: Initialization Scale vs Training Accuracycited by 70
  8. 2021What Kinds of Functions do Deep Neural Networks Learn? Insights from Variational Spline Theorycited by 60
  9. 2020Revealing the Structure of Deep Neural Networks via Convex Dualitycited by 54
  10. 2020Convex Geometry and Duality of Over-parameterized Neural Networkscited by 49
  11. 2016Reliably Learning the ReLU in Polynomial Timecited by 36
  12. 2020Vector-output ReLU Neural Network Problems are Copositive Programs: Convex Analysis of Two Layer Networks and Polynomial-time Algorithmscited by 33
  13. 2020The Hidden Convex Optimization Landscape of Two-Layer ReLU Neural Networks: an Exact Characterization of the Optimal Solutionscited by 30
  14. 2022Unraveling Attention via Convex Duality: Analysis and Interpretations of Vision Transformerscited by 30
  15. 2021Global Optimality Beyond Two Layers: Training Deep ReLU Networks via Convex Programscited by 25
  16. 2018Complexity of Training ReLU Neural Networkcited by 23
  17. 2021Demystifying Batch Normalization in ReLU Networks: Equivalent Convex Optimization Models and Implicit Regularizationcited by 21
  18. 2019Convex Formulation of Overparameterized Deep Neural Networkscited by 16
  19. 2023From Tempered to Benign Overfitting in ReLU Neural Networkscited by 16
  20. 2021Hidden Convexity of Wasserstein GANs: Interpretable Generative Models with Closed-Form Solutionscited by 14
  21. 2018Principled Deep Neural Network Training through Linear Programmingcited by 13
  22. 2022Convexifying Transformers: Improving optimization and understanding of transformer networkscited by 12
  23. 2019The Role of Neural Network Activation Functionscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 4.

7 papers.