mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Layerwise complexity-matched learning yields an improved model of cortical area V2

arXiv 2312.11436 ↗First posted 18 Dec 2023q-bio.NC cs.CV cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Human ability to recognize complex visual patterns arises through transformations performed by successive areas in the ventral visual cortex. Deep neural networks trained end-to-end for object recognition approach human capabilities, and offer the best descriptions to date of neural responses in the late stages of the hierarchy. But these networks provide a poor account of the early stages, compared to traditional hand-engineered models, or models optimized for coding efficiency or prediction. Moreover, the gradient backpropagation used in end-to-end learning is generally considered to be biologically implausible. Here, we overcome both of these limitations by developing a bottom-up self-supervised training methodology that operates independently on successive layers. Specifically, we maximize feature similarity between pairs of locally-deformed natural image patches, while decorrelating features across patches sampled from other images. Crucially, the deformation amplitudes are adjusted proportionally to receptive field sizes in each layer, thus matching the task complexity to the capacity at each stage of processing. In comparison with architecture-matched versions of previous models, we demonstrate that our layerwise complexity-matched learning (LCL) formulation produces a two-stage model (LCL-V2) that is better aligned with selectivity properties and neural activity in primate area V2. We demonstrate that the complexity-matched learning paradigm is responsible for much of the emergence of the improved biological alignment. Finally, when the two-stage model is used as a fixed front-end for a deep network trained to perform object recognition, the resultant model (LCL-V2Net) is significantly better than standard end-to-end self-supervised, supervised, and adversarially-trained models in terms of generalization to out-of-distribution tasks and alignment with human behavior.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 47 of its 111 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Dec 2023.

Builds on

47 of 111 references.

References · 47

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  4. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  5. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  6. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
  7. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  8. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
  9. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  10. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  11. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,750
  12. 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,969
35 more
  1. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,850
  2. 2021Barlow Twins: Self-Supervised Learning via Redundancy Reductioncited by 1,838
  3. 2018Unsupervised Representation Learning by Predicting Image Rotationscited by 1,591
  4. 2023Self-Supervised Learning from Images with a Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecturecited by 1,039
  5. 2018Deep Clustering for Unsupervised Learning of Visual Featurescited by 1,028
  6. 2023Scaling Vision Transformers to 22 Billion Parameterscited by 694
  7. 2018Exploring the Limits of Weakly Supervised Pretrainingcited by 605
  8. 2019Making Convolutional Networks Shift-Invariant Againcited by 391
  9. 2021Understanding Dimensional Collapse in Contrastive Self-supervised Learningcited by 378
  10. 2021Partial success in closing the gap between human and machine visioncited by 185
  11. 2022Contrastive and Non-Contrastive Self-Supervised Learning Recover Global and Local Spectral Embedding Methodscited by 149
  12. 2023Getting aligned on representational alignmentcited by 143
  13. 2020What shapes feature representations? Exploring datasets, architectures, and trainingcited by 126
  14. 2021Self-Supervised Learning with Swin Transformerscited by 122
  15. 2018Greedy Layerwise Learning Can Scale to ImageNetcited by 115
  16. 2021Can contrastive learning avoid shortcut solutions?cited by 114
  17. 2022On the duality between contrastive and non-contrastive self-supervised learningcited by 108
  18. 2019Brain-Like Object Recognition with High-Performing Shallow Recurrent ANNscited by 90
  19. 2019Putting An End to End-to-End: Gradient-Isolated Learning of Representationscited by 86
  20. 2020Beyond accuracy: quantifying trial-by-trial behaviour of CNNs and humans by measuring error consistencycited by 78
  21. 2021Unsupervised Object-Level Representation Learning from Scene Imagescited by 72
  22. 2019Do Image Classifiers Generalize Across Time?cited by 59
  23. 2020Watching the World Go By: Representation Learning from Unlabeled Videoscited by 59
  24. 2022Harmonizing the object recognition strategies of deep neural networks with humanscited by 59
  25. 2020LoCo: Local Contrastive Representation Learningcited by 55
  26. 2023Intriguing properties of generative classifierscited by 52
  27. 2020Local plasticity rules can learn deep representations using self-supervised contrastive predictionscited by 47
  28. 2023Neither hype nor gloom do DNNs justicecited by 40
  29. 2023Spatial-frequency channels, shape bias, and adversarial robustnesscited by 28
  30. 2017Eigen-Distortions of Hierarchical Representationscited by 26
  31. 2023Blockwise Self-Supervised Learning at Scalecited by 22
  32. 2023Performance-optimized deep neural networks are evolving into worse models of inferotemporal visual cortexcited by 18
  33. 2015Deep Networks Can Resemble Human Feed-forward Vision in Invariant Object Recognitioncited by 14
  34. 2020The shape and simplicity biases of adversarially robust ImageNet-trained CNNscited by 14
  35. 2020Self-Supervised Learning of a Biologically-Inspired Visual Texture Modelcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.