mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

How to Efficiently Annotate Images for Best-Performing Deep Learning Based Segmentation Models: An Empirical Study with Weak and Noisy Annotations and Segment Anything Model

arXiv 2312.10600 ↗First posted 17 Dec 2023cs.CVcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep neural networks (DNNs) have demonstrated exceptional performance across various image segmentation tasks. However, the process of preparing datasets for training segmentation DNNs is both labor-intensive and costly, as it typically requires pixel-level annotations for each object of interest. To mitigate this challenge, alternative approaches such as using weak labels (e.g., bounding boxes or scribbles) or less precise (noisy) annotations can be employed. Noisy and weak labels are significantly quicker to generate, allowing for more annotated images within the same time frame. However, the potential decrease in annotation quality may adversely impact the segmentation performance of the resulting model. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive cost-effectiveness evaluation on six variants of annotation strategies (9~10 sub-variants in total) across 4 datasets and conclude that the common practice of precisely outlining objects of interest is virtually never the optimal approach when annotation budget is limited. Both noisy and weak annotations showed usage cases that yield similar performance to the perfectly annotated counterpart, yet had significantly better cost-effectiveness. We hope our findings will help researchers be aware of the different available options and use their annotation budgets more efficiently, especially in cases where accurately acquiring labels for target objects is particularly costly. Our code will be made available on https://github.com/yzluka/AnnotationEfficiency2D.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Dec 2023.

Builds on

30 of 59 references.

References · 30

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
  2. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  3. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,234
  4. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
  5. 2016DeepLab: Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets, Atrous Convolution, and Fully Connected CRFscited by 3,241
  6. 2016Pyramid Scene Parsing Networkcited by 2,479
  7. 2021SimMIM: A Simple Framework for Masked Image Modelingcited by 1,153
  8. 2016Semantic Understanding of Scenes through the ADE20K Datasetcited by 1,069
  9. 2014Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets and Fully Connected CRFscited by 554
  10. 2018Identifying the Best Machine Learning Algorithms for Brain Tumor Segmentation, Progression Assessment, and Overall Survival Prediction in the BRATS Challengecited by 511
  11. 2019The Liver Tumor Segmentation Benchmark (LiTS)cited by 509
  12. 2021Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation with Cross Pseudo Supervisioncited by 463
18 more
  1. 2020Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation with Cross-Consistency Trainingcited by 376
  2. 2016ScribbleSup: Scribble-Supervised Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 331
  3. 2023Segment Anything Model for Medical Image Analysis: an Experimental Studycited by 291
  4. 2016Simple Does It: Weakly Supervised Instance and Semantic Segmentationcited by 227
  5. 2023Segment Anything in Medical Imagescited by 227
  6. 2015Weakly- and Semi-Supervised Learning of a DCNN for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 189
  7. 2021Reviving Iterative Training with Mask Guidance for Interactive Segmentationcited by 163
  8. 2018On Regularized Losses for Weakly-supervised CNN Segmentationcited by 121
  9. 2022FocalClick: Towards Practical Interactive Image Segmentationcited by 102
  10. 2019Image Classification with Deep Learning in the Presence of Noisy Labels: A Surveycited by 101
  11. 2019Box-driven Class-wise Region Masking and Filling Rate Guided Loss for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 98
  12. 2018Learning to Segment Medical Images with Scribble-Supervision Alonecited by 48
  13. 2021Background-Aware Pooling and Noise-Aware Loss for Weakly-Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 41
  14. 2022Omni-DETR: Omni-Supervised Object Detection with Transformerscited by 29
  15. 2014Can Image-Level Labels Replace Pixel-Level Labels for Image Parsingcited by 15
  16. 2018Imperfect Segmentation Labels: How Much Do They Matter?cited by 14
  17. 2018Hyperspectral Image Classification in the Presence of Noisy Labelscited by 12
  18. 2021Label noise in segmentation networks : mitigation must deal with biascited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

7 papers.