mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

PnPNet: Pull-and-Push Networks for Volumetric Segmentation with Boundary Confusion

arXiv 2312.08323 ↗First posted 13 Dec 2023cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Precise boundary segmentation of volumetric images is a critical task for image-guided diagnosis and computer-assisted intervention, especially for boundary confusion in clinical practice. However, U-shape networks cannot effectively resolve this challenge due to the lack of boundary shape constraints. Besides, existing methods of refining boundaries overemphasize the slender structure, which results in the overfitting phenomenon due to networks' limited abilities to model tiny objects. In this paper, we reconceptualize the mechanism of boundary generation by encompassing the interaction dynamics with adjacent regions. Moreover, we propose a unified network termed PnPNet to model shape characteristics of the confused boundary region. Core ingredients of PnPNet contain the pushing and pulling branches. Specifically, based on diffusion theory, we devise the semantic difference module (SDM) from the pushing branch to squeeze the boundary region. Explicit and implicit differential information inside SDM significantly boost representation abilities for inter-class boundaries. Additionally, motivated by the K-means algorithm, the class clustering module (CCM) from the pulling branch is introduced to stretch the intersected boundary region. Thus, pushing and pulling branches will shrink and enlarge the boundary uncertainty respectively. They furnish two adversarial forces to promote models to output a more precise delineation of boundaries. We carry out experiments on three challenging public datasets and one in-house dataset, containing three types of boundary confusion in model predictions. Experimental results demonstrate the superiority of PnPNet over other segmentation networks, especially on evaluation metrics of HD and ASSD. Besides, pushing and pulling branches can serve as plug-and-play modules to enhance classic U-shape baseline models. Codes are available.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 54 of its 88 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Dec 2023.

Builds on

54 of 88 references.

References · 54

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  4. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,158
  5. 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,384
  6. 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,430
  7. 2021Masked-attention Mask Transformer for Universal Image Segmentationcited by 2,338
  8. 2016V-Net: Fully Convolutional Neural Networks for Volumetric Medical Image Segmentationcited by 2,284
  9. 2021TransUNet: Transformers Make Strong Encoders for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 1,552
  10. 20163D U-Net: Learning Dense Volumetric Segmentation from Sparse Annotationcited by 1,471
  11. 2021Per-Pixel Classification is Not All You Need for Semantic Segmentationcited by 1,148
  12. 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 580
38 more
  1. 2022DAB-DETR: Dynamic Anchor Boxes are Better Queries for DETRcited by 569
  2. 2020PraNet: Parallel Reverse Attention Network for Polyp Segmentationcited by 460
  3. 2021Intriguing Properties of Vision Transformerscited by 446
  4. 2019PointRend: Image Segmentation as Renderingcited by 439
  5. 2021Conditional DETR for Fast Training Convergencecited by 422
  6. 2021Self-Supervised Pre-Training of Swin Transformers for 3D Medical Image Analysiscited by 418
  7. 2016ScribbleSup: Scribble-Supervised Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 330
  8. 2022How Do Vision Transformers Work?cited by 305
  9. 2023Segment Anything Model for Medical Image Analysis: an Experimental Studycited by 291
  10. 2021TransBTS: Multimodal Brain Tumor Segmentation Using Transformercited by 265
  11. 2019ResUNet-a: a deep learning framework for semantic segmentation of remotely sensed datacited by 260
  12. 2022Transformers in Medical Imaging: A Surveycited by 245
  13. 2021CoTr: Efficiently Bridging CNN and Transformer for 3D Medical Image Segmentationcited by 227
  14. 2016Validation, comparison, and combination of algorithms for automatic detection of pulmonary nodules in computed tomography images: the LUNA16 challengecited by 198
  15. 2022Medical Image Segmentation Review: The success of U-Netcited by 190
  16. 2018Boundary loss for highly unbalanced segmentationcited by 187
  17. 2022UNeXt: MLP-based Rapid Medical Image Segmentation Networkcited by 185
  18. 2023MedNeXt: Transformer-driven Scaling of ConvNets for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 161
  19. 2022Rethinking Semantic Segmentation: A Prototype Viewcited by 140
  20. 2023SAM-Med2Dcited by 123
  21. 2019Reducing the Hausdorff Distance in Medical Image Segmentation with Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 116
  22. 2020VerSe: A Vertebrae Labelling and Segmentation Benchmark for Multi-detector CT Imagescited by 111
  23. 2020SegFix: Model-Agnostic Boundary Refinement for Segmentationcited by 97
  24. 20223D UX-Net: A Large Kernel Volumetric ConvNet Modernizing Hierarchical Transformer for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 94
  25. 2018Deep learning to achieve clinically applicable segmentation of head and neck anatomy for radiotherapycited by 76
  26. 2021InverseForm: A Loss Function for Structured Boundary-Aware Segmentationcited by 65
  27. 2022CMT-DeepLab: Clustering Mask Transformers for Panoptic Segmentationcited by 60
  28. 2020Towards Data-Efficient Learning: A Benchmark for COVID-19 CT Lung and Infection Segmentationcited by 53
  29. 2021Look Closer to Segment Better: Boundary Patch Refinement for Instance Segmentationcited by 43
  30. 2021Active Boundary Loss for Semantic Segmentationcited by 40
  31. 2019ET-Net: A Generic Edge-aTtention Guidance Network for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 38
  32. 2021Progressive Semantic Segmentationcited by 35
  33. 2023Semantic Diffusion Network for Semantic Segmentationcited by 30
  34. 2020High-level Prior-based Loss Functions for Medical Image Segmentation: A Surveycited by 28
  35. 2022Learning Topological Interactions for Multi-Class Medical Image Segmentationcited by 28
  36. 2020Boundary-aware Context Neural Network for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 18
  37. 2019Automatic Pulmonary Lobe Segmentation Using Deep Learningcited by 15
  38. 2020Relational Modeling for Robust and Efficient Pulmonary Lobe Segmentation in CT Scanscited by 14

50 most cited of 54 All 54 (JSON)

Built on by

Not cited yet.