mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Making Large Language Models Better Knowledge Miners for Online Marketing with Progressive Prompting Augmentation

arXiv 2312.05276 ↗First posted 8 Dec 2023cs.AI cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Nowadays, the rapid development of mobile economy has promoted the flourishing of online marketing campaigns, whose success greatly hinges on the efficient matching between user preferences and desired marketing campaigns where a well-established Marketing-oriented Knowledge Graph (dubbed as MoKG) could serve as the critical "bridge" for preference propagation. In this paper, we seek to carefully prompt a Large Language Model (LLM) with domain-level knowledge as a better marketing-oriented knowledge miner for marketing-oriented knowledge graph construction, which is however non-trivial, suffering from several inevitable issues in real-world marketing scenarios, i.e., uncontrollable relation generation of LLMs,insufficient prompting ability of a single prompt, the unaffordable deployment cost of LLMs. To this end, we propose PAIR, a novel Progressive prompting Augmented mIning fRamework for harvesting marketing-oriented knowledge graph with LLMs. In particular, we reduce the pure relation generation to an LLM based adaptive relation filtering process through the knowledge-empowered prompting technique. Next, we steer LLMs for entity expansion with progressive prompting augmentation,followed by a reliable aggregation with comprehensive consideration of both self-consistency and semantic relatedness. In terms of online serving, we specialize in a small and white-box PAIR (i.e.,LightPAIR),which is fine-tuned with a high-quality corpus provided by a strong teacher-LLM. Extensive experiments and practical applications in audience targeting verify the effectiveness of the proposed (Light)PAIR.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Dec 2023.

Builds on

27 of 49 references.

References · 27

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  3. 2019Language Models as Knowledge Bases?cited by 1,922
  4. 2016ConceptNet 5.5: An Open Multilingual Graph of General Knowledgecited by 1,065
  5. 2022GLM-130B: An Open Bilingual Pre-trained Modelcited by 837
  6. 2023REPLUG: Retrieval-Augmented Black-Box Language Modelscited by 786
  7. 2023Baichuan 2: Open Large-scale Language Modelscited by 664
  8. 2023How Language Model Hallucinations Can Snowballcited by 310
  9. 2023Head-to-Tail: How Knowledgeable are Large Language Models (LLMs)? A.K.A. Will LLMs Replace Knowledge Graphs?cited by 167
  10. 2022Ask Me Anything: A simple strategy for prompting language modelscited by 155
  11. 2019A Survey on Recent Advances in Named Entity Recognition from Deep Learning modelscited by 117
  12. 2020Language Models are Open Knowledge Graphscited by 95
15 more
  1. 2023Crawling the Internal Knowledge-Base of Language Modelscited by 85
  2. 2018A Survey on Semantic Parsingcited by 62
  3. 2020TransOMCS: From Linguistic Graphs to Commonsense Knowledgecited by 52
  4. 2019Commonsense Properties from Query Logs and Question Answering Forumscited by 26
  5. 2021DISCOS: Bridging the Gap between Discourse Knowledge and Commonsense Knowledgecited by 26
  6. 2023Explicit Feature Interaction-aware Uplift Network for Online Marketingcited by 25
  7. 2022Optimizing Bi-Encoder for Named Entity Recognition via Contrastive Learningcited by 24
  8. 2020Soft Gazetteers for Low-Resource Named Entity Recognitioncited by 20
  9. 2021Refined Commonsense Knowledge from Large-Scale Web Contentscited by 19
  10. 2021Learning to Expand Audience via Meta Hybrid Experts and Critics for Recommendation and Advertisingcited by 11
  11. 2023Zero-shot Approach to Overcome Perturbation Sensitivity of Promptscited by 11
  12. 2020Sources of Transfer in Multilingual Named Entity Recognitioncited by 9
  13. 2021Adversarial Learning for Incentive Optimization in Mobile Payment Marketingcited by 4
  14. 2023Who Would be Interested in Services? An Entity Graph Learning System for User Targetingcited by 3
  15. 2023Exploring 360-Degree View of Customers for Lookalike Modelingcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025KERAG_R: Knowledge-Enhanced Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Recommendation
  2. 2024Know Your Needs Better: Towards Structured Understanding of Marketer Demands with Analogical Reasoning Augmented LLMs
  3. 2025Comparative Analysis of Neural Retriever-Reranker Pipelines for Retrieval-Augmented Generation over Knowledge Graphs in E-commerce Applications
  4. 2026RPO-RAG: Aligning Small LLMs with Relation-aware Preference Optimization for Knowledge Graph Question Answering
  5. 2025Automated Query-Product Relevance Labeling using Large Language Models for E-commerce Search
  6. 2023LLMs for Knowledge Graph Construction and Reasoning: Recent Capabilities and Future Opportunities
  7. 2024Generating Knowledge Graphs from Large Language Models: A Comparative Study of GPT-4, LLaMA 2, and BERT
  8. 2024Retrieval-Augmented Language Model for Extreme Multi-Label Knowledge Graph Link Prediction