Identifying Biased Subgroups in Ranking and Classification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
When analyzing the behavior of machine learning algorithms, it is important to identify specific data subgroups for which the considered algorithm shows different performance with respect to the entire dataset. The intervention of domain experts is normally required to identify relevant attributes that define these subgroups. We introduce the notion of divergence to measure this performance difference and we exploit it in the context of (i) classification models and (ii) ranking applications to automatically detect data subgroups showing a significant deviation in their behavior. Furthermore, we quantify the contribution of all attributes in the data subgroup to the divergent behavior by means of Shapley values, thus allowing the identification of the most impacting attributes.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Aug 2021.
Builds on
12 of 25 references.
References · 12
- 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 970
- 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 802
- 2017Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairnesscited by 381
- 2018An Intersectional Definition of Fairnesscited by 126
- 2017FA*IR: A Fair Top-k Ranking Algorithmcited by 113
- 2019FairVis: Visual Analytics for Discovering Intersectional Bias in Machine Learningcited by 93
- 2016Measuring Fairness in Ranked Outputscited by 81
- 2017Ranking with Fairness Constraintscited by 78
- 2018Automated Data Slicing for Model Validation:A Big data - AI Integration Approachcited by 70
- 2021Fairness in Ranking: A Surveycited by 33
- 2019Auditing and Achieving Intersectional Fairness in Classification Problemscited by 25
- 2019FairSearch: A Tool For Fairness in Ranked Search Resultscited by 22
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.
6 papers.
- 2024ShaRP: Explaining Rankings and Preferences with Shapley Valuescited by 3
- 2024A Bayesian Approach to Harnessing the Power of LLMs in Authorship Attributioncited by 3
- 2025Aggregation Hides Out-of-Distribution Generalization Failures from Spurious Correlationscited by 2
- 2023Detecting algorithmic bias in medical-AI models using treescited by 1
- 2022An Efficient Framework for Monitoring Subgroup Performance of Machine Learning Systemscited by 0
- 2022Detection of Groups with Biased Representation in Rankingcited by 0
- 2025Aggregation Hides Out-of-Distribution Generalization Failures from Spurious Correlations28 Oct 2025
- 2024A Bayesian Approach to Harnessing the Power of LLMs in Authorship Attribution29 Oct 2024
- 2024ShaRP: Explaining Rankings and Preferences with Shapley Values30 Jan 2024
- 2023Detecting algorithmic bias in medical-AI models using trees5 Dec 2023
- 2022Detection of Groups with Biased Representation in Ranking30 Dec 2022
- 2022An Efficient Framework for Monitoring Subgroup Performance of Machine Learning Systems16 Dec 2022