mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

STADEE: STAtistics-based DEEp Detection of Machine Generated Text

arXiv 2312.01672 ↗First posted 4 Dec 2023cs.CL cs.AIcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We present STADEE, a STAtistics-based DEEp detection method to identify machine-generated text, addressing the limitations of current methods that rely heavily on fine-tuning pre-trained language models (PLMs). STADEE integrates key statistical text features with a deep classifier, focusing on aspects like token probability and cumulative probability, crucial for handling nucleus sampling. Tested across diverse datasets and scenarios (in-domain, out-of-domain, and in-the-wild), STADEE demonstrates superior performance, achieving an 87.05% F1 score in-domain and outperforming both traditional statistical methods and fine-tuned PLMs, especially in out-of-domain and in-the-wild settings, highlighting its effectiveness and generalizability.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Dec 2023.

Builds on

18 of 24 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  4. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  5. 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,881
  6. 2018Hierarchical Neural Story Generationcited by 1,182
  7. 2019DialoGPT: Large-Scale Generative Pre-training for Conversational Response Generationcited by 842
  8. 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 705
  9. 2019Defending Against Neural Fake Newscited by 553
  10. 2019Release Strategies and the Social Impacts of Language Modelscited by 505
  11. 2019GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Textcited by 490
  12. 2023How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detectioncited by 472
6 more
  1. 2019InceptionTime: Finding AlexNet for Time Series Classificationcited by 386
  2. 2019Automatic Detection of Generated Text is Easiest when Humans are Fooledcited by 260
  3. 2020Automatic Detection of Machine Generated Text: A Critical Surveycited by 160
  4. 2020CPM: A Large-scale Generative Chinese Pre-trained Language Modelcited by 60
  5. 2019Generating Sentiment-Preserving Fake Online Reviews Using Neural Language Models and Their Human- and Machine-based Detectioncited by 50
  6. 2020Automated Source Code Generation and Auto-completion Using Deep Learning: Comparing and Discussing Current Language-Model-Related Approachescited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 1.

4 papers.