mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Marginal Density Ratio for Off-Policy Evaluation in Contextual Bandits

arXiv 2312.01457 ↗First posted 3 Dec 2023stat.ML cs.LG stat.MEcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Off-Policy Evaluation (OPE) in contextual bandits is crucial for assessing new policies using existing data without costly experimentation. However, current OPE methods, such as Inverse Probability Weighting (IPW) and Doubly Robust (DR) estimators, suffer from high variance, particularly in cases of low overlap between target and behavior policies or large action and context spaces. In this paper, we introduce a new OPE estimator for contextual bandits, the Marginal Ratio (MR) estimator, which focuses on the shift in the marginal distribution of outcomes Y instead of the policies themselves. Through rigorous theoretical analysis, we demonstrate the benefits of the MR estimator compared to conventional methods like IPW and DR in terms of variance reduction. Additionally, we establish a connection between the MR estimator and the state-of-the-art Marginalized Inverse Propensity Score (MIPS) estimator, proving that MR achieves lower variance among a generalized family of MIPS estimators. We further illustrate the utility of the MR estimator in causal inference settings, where it exhibits enhanced performance in estimating Average Treatment Effects (ATE). Our experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets corroborate our theoretical findings and highlight the practical advantages of the MR estimator in OPE for contextual bandits.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Dec 2023.

Builds on

27 of 44 references.

References · 27

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2017Causal Effect Inference with Deep Latent-Variable Modelscited by 408
  3. 2015Doubly Robust Off-policy Value Evaluation for Reinforcement Learningcited by 337
  4. 2016Data-Efficient Off-Policy Policy Evaluation for Reinforcement Learningcited by 285
  5. 2018Breaking the Curse of Horizon: Infinite-Horizon Off-Policy Estimationcited by 226
  6. 2015Doubly Robust Policy Evaluation and Optimizationcited by 158
  7. 2018More Robust Doubly Robust Off-policy Evaluationcited by 141
  8. 2019Empirical Study of Off-Policy Policy Evaluation for Reinforcement Learningcited by 121
  9. 2019Towards Optimal Off-Policy Evaluation for Reinforcement Learning with Marginalized Importance Samplingcited by 118
  10. 2019Double Reinforcement Learning for Efficient Off-Policy Evaluation in Markov Decision Processescited by 118
  11. 2016Optimal and Adaptive Off-policy Evaluation in Contextual Banditscited by 111
  12. 2016Off-policy evaluation for slate recommendationcited by 102
15 more
  1. 2019Doubly robust off-policy evaluation with shrinkagecited by 87
  2. 2020Open Bandit Dataset and Pipeline: Towards Realistic and Reproducible Off-Policy Evaluationcited by 77
  3. 2018Mining gold from implicit models to improve likelihood-free inferencecited by 60
  4. 2020Off-policy Bandits with Deficient Supportcited by 60
  5. 2018Optimal Rates for Spectral Algorithms with Least-Squares Regression over Hilbert Spacescited by 59
  6. 2022Off-Policy Evaluation for Large Action Spaces via Embeddingscited by 53
  7. 2019Understanding the Curse of Horizon in Off-Policy Evaluation via Conditional Importance Samplingcited by 36
  8. 2020Optimal Off-Policy Evaluation from Multiple Logging Policiescited by 30
  9. 2018Bayesian Counterfactual Risk Minimizationcited by 28
  10. 2023Generalization Ability of Wide Neural Networks on ℝcited by 28
  11. 2021A Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach to Marginalized Importance Sampling with the Successor Representationcited by 19
  12. 2020Contextual-Bandit Based Personalized Recommendation with Time-Varying User Interestscited by 18
  13. 2019Conditional Importance Sampling for Off-Policy Learningcited by 12
  14. 2019Balanced off-policy evaluation in general action spacescited by 11
  15. 2019Triply Robust Off-Policy Evaluationcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 3; 2026: 3.

9 papers.