ExCeL : Combined Extreme and Collective Logit Information for Enhancing Out-of-Distribution Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep learning models often exhibit overconfidence in predicting out-of-distribution (OOD) data, underscoring the crucial role of OOD detection in ensuring reliability in predictions. Among various OOD detection approaches, post-hoc detectors have gained significant popularity, primarily due to their ease of use and implementation. However, the effectiveness of most post-hoc OOD detectors has been constrained as they rely solely either on extreme information, such as the maximum logit, or on the collective information (i.e., information spanned across classes or training samples) embedded within the output layer. In this paper, we propose ExCeL that combines both extreme and collective information within the output layer for enhanced accuracy in OOD detection. We leverage the logit of the top predicted class as the extreme information (i.e., the maximum logit), while the collective information is derived in a novel approach that involves assessing the likelihood of other classes appearing in subsequent ranks across various training samples. Our idea is motivated by the observation that, for in-distribution (ID) data, the ranking of classes beyond the predicted class is more deterministic compared to that in OOD data. Experiments conducted on CIFAR100 and ImageNet-200 datasets demonstrate that ExCeL consistently is among the five top-performing methods out of twenty-one existing post-hoc baselines when the joint performance on near-OOD and far-OOD is considered (i.e., in terms of AUROC and FPR95). Furthermore, ExCeL shows the best overall performance across both datasets, unlike other baselines that work best on one dataset but has a performance drop in the other.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 44 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Nov 2023.
Builds on
44 of 53 references.
References · 44
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 4,993
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
- 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,362
- 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,110
- 2018A Simple Unified Framework for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samples and Adversarial Attackscited by 1,472
- 2017Enhancing The Reliability of Out-of-distribution Image Detection in Neural Networkscited by 1,325
- 2020Energy-based Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 1,296
- 2018Deep Anomaly Detection with Outlier Exposurecited by 939
- 2021Generalized Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Surveycited by 796
- 2022Out-of-Distribution Detection with Deep Nearest Neighborscited by 596
- 2015Towards Open Set Deep Networkscited by 533
32 more
- 2019Using Self-Supervised Learning Can Improve Model Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 511
- 2021ReAct: Out-of-distribution Detection With Rectified Activationscited by 486
- 2019Scaling Out-of-Distribution Detection for Real-World Settingscited by 465
- 2020CSI: Novelty Detection via Contrastive Learning on Distributionally Shifted Instancescited by 441
- 2020Generalized ODIN: Detecting Out-of-distribution Image without Learning from Out-of-distribution Datacited by 408
- 2022ViM: Out-Of-Distribution with Virtual-logit Matchingcited by 404
- 2021Open-Set Recognition: a Good Closed-Set Classifier is All You Need?cited by 351
- 2021On the Importance of Gradients for Detecting Distributional Shifts in the Wildcited by 338
- 2022VOS: Learning What You Don't Know by Virtual Outlier Synthesiscited by 300
- 2022Mitigating Neural Network Overconfidence with Logit Normalizationcited by 251
- 2018Learning Confidence for Out-of-Distribution Detection in Neural Networkscited by 245
- 2021MOS: Towards Scaling Out-of-distribution Detection for Large Semantic Spacecited by 233
- 2022Extremely Simple Activation Shaping for Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 212
- 2021A Simple Fix to Mahalanobis Distance for Improving Near-OOD Detectioncited by 206
- 2023OpenOOD v1.5: Enhanced Benchmark for Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 178
- 2021DICE: Leveraging Sparsification for Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 166
- 2021Adversarial Reciprocal Points Learning for Open Set Recognitioncited by 153
- 2020Can Autonomous Vehicles Identify, Recover From, and Adapt to Distribution Shifts?cited by 139
- 2021OpenGAN: Open-Set Recognition via Open Data Generationcited by 135
- 2023In or Out? Fixing ImageNet Out-of-Distribution Detection Evaluationcited by 132
- 2023Non-Parametric Outlier Synthesiscited by 129
- 2022How to Exploit Hyperspherical Embeddings for Out-of-Distribution Detection?cited by 128
- 2020ATOM: Robustifying Out-of-distribution Detection Using Outlier Miningcited by 116
- 2019Unsupervised Out-of-Distribution Detection by Maximum Classifier Discrepancycited by 112
- 2022POEM: Out-of-Distribution Detection with Posterior Samplingcited by 108
- 2021Semantically Coherent Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 107
- 2021Does Your Dermatology Classifier Know What It Doesn't Know? Detecting the Long-Tail of Unseen Conditionscited by 68
- 2021Mixture Outlier Exposure: Towards Out-of-Distribution Detection in Fine-grained Environmentscited by 65
- 2022RankFeat: Rank-1 Feature Removal for Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 52
- 2021Neural Mean Discrepancy for Efficient Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 42
- 2020Out-of-Distribution Detection for Automotive Perceptioncited by 37
- 2022RODD: A Self-Supervised Approach for Robust Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 13
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
- 2025RankOOD -- Class Ranking-based Out-of-Distribution Detection25 Nov 2025