Risk-sensitive Markov Decision Process and Learning under General Utility Functions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Reinforcement Learning (RL) has gained substantial attention across diverse application domains and theoretical investigations. Existing literature on RL theory largely focuses on risk-neutral settings where the decision-maker learns to maximize the expected cumulative reward. However, in practical scenarios such as portfolio management and e-commerce recommendations, decision-makers often persist in heterogeneous risk preferences subject to outcome uncertainties, which can not be well-captured by the risk-neural framework. Incorporating these preferences can be approached through utility theory, yet the development of risk-sensitive RL under general utility functions remains an open question for theoretical exploration. In this paper, we consider a scenario where the decision-maker seeks to optimize a general utility function of the cumulative reward in the framework of a Markov decision process (MDP). To facilitate the Dynamic Programming Principle and Bellman equation, we enlarge the state space with an additional dimension that accounts for the cumulative reward. We propose a discretized approximation scheme to the MDP under enlarged state space, which is tractable and key for algorithmic design. We then propose a modified value iteration algorithm that employs an epsilon-covering over the space of cumulative reward. When a simulator is accessible, our algorithm efficiently learns a near-optimal policy with guaranteed sample complexity. In the absence of a simulator, our algorithm, designed with an upper-confidence-bound exploration approach, identifies a near-optimal policy while ensuring a guaranteed regret bound. Finally, we establish a novel theoretical regret lower bound for the risk-sensitive setting, and show that the regret of our algorithm matches this lower bound up to a small polynomial factor
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Nov 2023.
Builds on
24 of 57 references.
References · 24
- 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,407
- 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,274
- 2015End-to-End Training of Deep Visuomotor Policiescited by 875
- 2019Provably Efficient Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximationcited by 520
- 2017Minimax Regret Bounds for Reinforcement Learningcited by 503
- 2020Is Pessimism Provably Efficient for Offline RL?cited by 364
- 2019A Theoretical Analysis of Deep Q-Learningcited by 215
- 2019Reinforcement Learning in Feature Space: Matrix Bandit, Kernels, and Regret Boundcited by 201
- 2013Risk-sensitive Reinforcement Learningcited by 130
- 2019Model-Based Reinforcement Learning with a Generative Model is Minimax Optimalcited by 127
- 2021Recent Advances in Reinforcement Learning in Financecited by 110
- 2020Risk-Sensitive Reinforcement Learning: Near-Optimal Risk-Sample Tradeoff in Regretcited by 58
12 more
- 2021Exponential Bellman Equation and Improved Regret Bounds for Risk-Sensitive Reinforcement Learningcited by 43
- 2023Near-Minimax-Optimal Risk-Sensitive Reinforcement Learning with CVaRcited by 32
- 2022Regret Bounds for Risk-Sensitive Reinforcement Learningcited by 26
- 2021Reinforcement Learning with Dynamic Convex Risk Measurescited by 21
- 2021On the Convergence and Optimality of Policy Gradient for Markov Coherent Riskcited by 20
- 2018Reinforcement Learning and Deep Learning based Lateral Control for Autonomous Drivingcited by 18
- 2022Bridging Distributional and Risk-sensitive Reinforcement Learning with Provable Regret Boundscited by 16
- 2023Regret Bounds for Markov Decision Processes with Recursive Optimized Certainty Equivalentscited by 15
- 2018Stochastic Approximation for Risk-aware Markov Decision Processescited by 10
- 2023Sample Efficient Deep Reinforcement Learning via Local Planningcited by 10
- 2018The Users' Perspective on the Privacy-Utility Trade-offs in Health Recommender Systemscited by 3
- 2020A dynamic analytic method for risk-aware controlled martingale problemscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 0; 2026: 4.
7 papers.
- 2024Continuous-time Risk-sensitive Reinforcement Learning via Quadratic Variation Penaltycited by 9
- 2024RA-PbRL: Provably Efficient Risk-Aware Preference-Based Reinforcement Learningcited by 9
- 2024Pessimism Meets Risk: Risk-Sensitive Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 6
- 2026Robust General Utility for Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
- 2026Global Optimality for Constrained Exploration via Penalty Regularizationcited by 0
- 2026Theoretical Foundations of max@k Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
- 2026Categorizer Automata for Discounted-Sum Payoffscited by 0
- 2026Categorizer Automata for Discounted-Sum Payoffs27 Aug 2026
- 2026Robust General Utility for Reinforcement Learning4 Aug 2026
- 2026Theoretical Foundations of max@k Reinforcement Learning20 Jul 2026
- 2026Global Optimality for Constrained Exploration via Penalty Regularization30 Apr 2026
- 2024RA-PbRL: Provably Efficient Risk-Aware Preference-Based Reinforcement Learning31 Oct 2024
- 2024Pessimism Meets Risk: Risk-Sensitive Offline Reinforcement Learning10 Jul 2024
- 2024Continuous-time Risk-sensitive Reinforcement Learning via Quadratic Variation Penalty19 Apr 2024