AMES: A Differentiable Embedding Space Selection Framework for Latent Graph Inference
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In real-world scenarios, although data entities may possess inherent relationships, the specific graph illustrating their connections might not be directly accessible. Latent graph inference addresses this issue by enabling Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) to operate on point cloud data, dynamically learning the necessary graph structure. These graphs are often derived from a latent embedding space, which can be modeled using Euclidean, hyperbolic, spherical, or product spaces. However, currently, there is no principled differentiable method for determining the optimal embedding space. In this work, we introduce the Attentional Multi-Embedding Selection (AMES) framework, a differentiable method for selecting the best embedding space for latent graph inference through backpropagation, considering a downstream task. Our framework consistently achieves comparable or superior results compared to previous methods for latent graph inference across five benchmark datasets. Importantly, our approach eliminates the need for conducting multiple experiments to identify the optimal embedding space. Furthermore, we explore interpretability techniques that track the gradient contributions of different latent graphs, shedding light on how our attention-based, fully differentiable approach learns to choose the appropriate latent space. In line with previous works, our experiments emphasize the advantages of hyperbolic spaces in enhancing performance. More importantly, our interpretability framework provides a general approach for quantitatively comparing embedding spaces across different tasks based on their contributions, a dimension that has been overlooked in previous literature on latent graph inference.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Nov 2023.
Builds on
24 of 27 references.
References · 24
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,548
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,371
- 2018Dynamic Graph CNN for Learning on Point Cloudscited by 2,223
- 2021Geometric Deep Learning: Grids, Groups, Graphs, Geodesics, and Gaugescited by 1,167
- 2020On the Bottleneck of Graph Neural Networks and its Practical Implicationscited by 631
- 2020Parameterized Explainer for Graph Neural Networkcited by 426
- 2019Diffusion Improves Graph Learningcited by 414
- 2019Hyperbolic Graph Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 402
- 2020Graph Structure Learning for Robust Graph Neural Networkscited by 371
- 2021GRAND: Graph Neural Diffusioncited by 258
- 2019Learning Discrete Structures for Graph Neural Networkscited by 231
12 more
- 2022Riemannian Score-Based Generative Modellingcited by 219
- 2020Iterative Deep Graph Learning for Graph Neural Networks: Better and Robust Node Embeddingscited by 214
- 2022Riemannian Diffusion Modelscited by 122
- 2019Continuous Hierarchical Representations with Poincar'e Variational Auto-Encoderscited by 112
- 2019Hyperspherical Prototype Networkscited by 86
- 2020Differentiable Graph Module (DGM) for Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 86
- 2022Expander Graph Propagationcited by 75
- 2020Latent-Graph Learning for Disease Predictioncited by 39
- 2022Latent Graph Inference using Product Manifoldscited by 23
- 2023Neural Latent Geometry Search: Product Manifold Inference via Gromov-Hausdorff-Informed Bayesian Optimizationcited by 18
- 2023Projections of Model Spaces for Latent Graph Inferencecited by 9
- 2023Capacity Bounds for Hyperbolic Neural Network Representations of Latent Tree Structurescited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3.
3 papers.