Neural Spacetimes for DAG Representation Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We propose a class of trainable deep learning-based geometries called Neural Spacetimes (NSTs), which can universally represent nodes in weighted directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) as events in a spacetime manifold. While most works in the literature focus on undirected graph representation learning or causality embedding separately, our differentiable geometry can encode both graph edge weights in its spatial dimensions and causality in the form of edge directionality in its temporal dimensions. We use a product manifold that combines a quasi-metric (for space) and a partial order (for time). NSTs are implemented as three neural networks trained in an end-to-end manner: an embedding network, which learns to optimize the location of nodes as events in the spacetime manifold, and two other networks that optimize the space and time geometries in parallel, which we call a neural (quasi-)metric and a neural partial order, respectively. The latter two networks leverage recent ideas at the intersection of fractal geometry and deep learning to shape the geometry of the representation space in a data-driven fashion, unlike other works in the literature that use fixed spacetime manifolds such as Minkowski space or De Sitter space to embed DAGs. Our main theoretical guarantee is a universal embedding theorem, showing that any k-point DAG can be embedded into an NST with 1+O(log(k)) distortion while exactly preserving its causal structure. The total number of parameters defining the NST is sub-cubic in k and linear in the width of the DAG. If the DAG has a planar Hasse diagram, this is improved to O(log(k)) + 2) spatial and 2 temporal dimensions. We validate our framework computationally with synthetic weighted DAGs and real-world network embeddings; in both cases, the NSTs achieve lower embedding distortions than their counterparts using fixed spacetime geometries.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 91 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Aug 2024.
Builds on
33 of 91 references.
References · 33
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
- 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
- 2020Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on Graphscited by 2,148
- 2016Convolutional Neural Networks on Graphs with Fast Localized Spectral Filteringcited by 2,085
- 2018DAGs with NO TEARS: Continuous Optimization for Structure Learningcited by 745
- 2019Multi-scale Attributed Node Embeddingcited by 543
- 2018Hyperbolic Neural Networkscited by 393
- 2020Graph Neural Networks with Heterophilycited by 202
- 2022Bayesian Structure Learning with Generative Flow Networkscited by 153
- 2020COT-GAN: Generating Sequential Data via Causal Optimal Transportcited by 70
- 2023Graph Metanetworks for Processing Diverse Neural Architecturescited by 55
- 2020Tree! I am no Tree! I am a Low Dimensional Hyperbolic Embeddingcited by 36
21 more
- 2023Out-of-distributional risk bounds for neural operators with applications to the Helmholtz equationcited by 32
- 2022Heterogeneous manifolds for curvature-aware graph embeddingcited by 23
- 2022Latent Graph Inference using Product Manifoldscited by 23
- 2022Designing Universal Causal Deep Learning Models: The Geometric (Hyper)Transformercited by 22
- 2022Integral Probability Metrics PAC-Bayes Boundscited by 19
- 2023Neural Latent Geometry Search: Product Manifold Inference via Gromov-Hausdorff-Informed Bayesian Optimizationcited by 18
- 2020Ultrahyperbolic Representation Learningcited by 17
- 2022Instance-Dependent Generalization Bounds via Optimal Transportcited by 13
- 2022Computational methods for adapted optimal transportcited by 12
- 2022Small Transformers Compute Universal Metric Embeddingscited by 12
- 2016Causal optimal transport and its links to enlargement of filtrations and continuous-time stochastic optimizationcited by 11
- 2021Directed Graph Embeddings in Pseudo-Riemannian Manifoldscited by 9
- 2023Optimal transport and Wasserstein distances for causal modelscited by 9
- 2023Neural Snowflakes: Universal Latent Graph Inference via Trainable Latent Geometriescited by 6
- 2023Capacity Bounds for Hyperbolic Neural Network Representations of Latent Tree Structurescited by 4
- 2023AMES: A Differentiable Embedding Space Selection Framework for Latent Graph Inferencecited by 3
- 2014Estimating causal structure using conditional DAG modelscited by 2
- 2017Metric Embedding via Shortest Path Decompositionscited by 2
- 2024General duality and dual attainment for adapted transportcited by 2
- 2018Near Isometric Terminal Embeddings for Doubling Metricscited by 1
- 2019A face cover perspective to ℓ1 embeddings of planar graphscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2025Enhancing LLMs' Reasoning-Intensive Multimedia Search Capabilities through Fine-Tuning and Reinforcement Learningcited by 3
- 2024Mixed-curvature decision trees and random forestscited by 2
- 2025The Geometry of Meaning: Perfect Spacetime Representations of Hierarchical Structurescited by 0
- 2025Bridging Graph and State-Space Modeling for Intensive Care Unit Length of Stay Predictioncited by 0
- 2026Classification Fields: Arbitrarily Fine Recursive Hierarchical Clustering From Few Examplescited by 0
- 2026Classification Fields: Arbitrarily Fine Recursive Hierarchical Clustering From Few Examples8 May 2026
- 2025Bridging Graph and State-Space Modeling for Intensive Care Unit Length of Stay Prediction24 Aug 2025
- 2025Enhancing LLMs' Reasoning-Intensive Multimedia Search Capabilities through Fine-Tuning and Reinforcement Learning24 May 2025
- 2025The Geometry of Meaning: Perfect Spacetime Representations of Hierarchical Structures7 May 2025
- 2024Mixed-curvature decision trees and random forests3 Oct 2024