From Categories to Classifiers: Name-Only Continual Learning by Exploring the Web
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Continual Learning (CL) often relies on the availability of extensive annotated datasets, an assumption that is unrealistically time-consuming and costly in practice. We explore a novel paradigm termed name-only continual learning where time and cost constraints prohibit manual annotation. In this scenario, learners adapt to new category shifts using only category names without the luxury of annotated training data. Our proposed solution leverages the expansive and ever-evolving internet to query and download uncurated webly-supervised data for image classification. We investigate the reliability of our web data and find them comparable, and in some cases superior, to manually annotated datasets. Additionally, we show that by harnessing the web, we can create support sets that surpass state-of-the-art name-only classification that create support sets using generative models or image retrieval from LAION-5B, achieving up to 25% boost in accuracy. When applied across varied continual learning contexts, our method consistently exhibits a small performance gap in comparison to models trained on manually annotated datasets. We present EvoTrends, a class-incremental dataset made from the web to capture real-world trends, created in just minutes. Overall, this paper underscores the potential of using uncurated webly-supervised data to mitigate the challenges associated with manual data labeling in continual learning.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 50 of its 75 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Nov 2023.
Builds on
50 of 75 references.
References · 50
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
- 2022Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latentscited by 6,539
- 2022LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text modelscited by 4,131
- 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,848
- 2016iCaRL: Incremental Classifier and Representation Learningcited by 2,313
- 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,701
- 2021An Empirical Study of Training Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 1,610
- 2022Reproducible scaling laws for contrastive language-image learningcited by 1,163
- 2017Deeper, Broader and Artier Domain Generalizationcited by 983
- 2017Revisiting Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data in Deep Learning Eracited by 916
38 more
- 2016Efficient and robust approximate nearest neighbor search using Hierarchical Navigable Small World graphscited by 853
- 2021Robust fine-tuning of zero-shot modelscited by 785
- 2018Exploring the Limits of Weakly Supervised Pretrainingcited by 604
- 2019Selection via Proxy: Efficient Data Selection for Deep Learningcited by 337
- 2022Visual Classification via Description from Large Language Modelscited by 331
- 2022Is synthetic data from generative models ready for image recognition?cited by 320
- 2023Your Diffusion Model is Secretly a Zero-Shot Classifiercited by 301
- 2022What does a platypus look like? Generating customized prompts for zero-shot image classificationcited by 263
- 2017WebVision Database: Visual Learning and Understanding from Web Datacited by 262
- 2020Large image datasets: A pyrrhic win for computer vision?cited by 237
- 2015Learning Visual Features from Large Weakly Supervised Datacited by 165
- 2023Prompt, Generate, then Cache: Cascade of Foundation Models makes Strong Few-shot Learnerscited by 152
- 2020Mining Cross-Image Semantics for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 144
- 2019Large-scale weakly-supervised pre-training for video action recognitioncited by 130
- 2022SuS-X: Training-Free Name-Only Transfer of Vision-Language Modelscited by 118
- 2022Revisiting Weakly Supervised Pre-Training of Visual Perception Modelscited by 116
- 2022CALIP: Zero-Shot Enhancement of CLIP with Parameter-free Attentioncited by 103
- 2023Waffling around for Performance: Visual Classification with Random Words and Broad Conceptscited by 100
- 2015Webly Supervised Learning of Convolutional Networkscited by 95
- 2016Learning Visual N-Grams from Web Datacited by 95
- 2022The CLEAR Benchmark: Continual LEArning on Real-World Imagerycited by 92
- 2020A Wholistic View of Continual Learning with Deep Neural Networks: Forgotten Lessons and the Bridge to Active and Open World Learningcited by 86
- 2023Computationally Budgeted Continual Learning: What Does Matter?cited by 61
- 2022A Simple Baseline that Questions the Use of Pretrained-Models in Continual Learningcited by 54
- 2021Self-Supervised Training Enhances Online Continual Learningcited by 53
- 2015The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Noisy Data for Fine-Grained Recognitioncited by 48
- 2022Webly Supervised Concept Expansion for General Purpose Vision Modelscited by 45
- 2019Sampling Bias in Deep Active Classification: An Empirical Studycited by 36
- 2021Webly Supervised Fine-Grained Recognition: Benchmark Datasets and An Approachcited by 32
- 2023Online Continual Learning Without the Storage Constraintcited by 29
- 2020Similarity Search for Efficient Active Learning and Search of Rare Conceptscited by 24
- 2021Billion-Scale Pretraining with Vision Transformers for Multi-Task Visual Representationscited by 24
- 2023Internet Explorer: Targeted Representation Learning on the Open Webcited by 21
- 2021Learning From Long-Tailed Data With Noisy Labelscited by 17
- 2023Neural Priming for Sample-Efficient Adaptationcited by 12
- 2023Rapid Adaptation in Online Continual Learning: Are We Evaluating It Right?cited by 10
- 2023Agile Modeling: From Concept to Classifier in Minutescited by 8
- 2022Can I see an Example? Active Learning the Long Tail of Attributes and Relationscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 1.
5 papers.
- 2024No "Zero-Shot" Without Exponential Data: Pretraining Concept Frequency Determines Multimodal Model Performancecited by 75
- 2024kNN-CLIP: Retrieval Enables Training-Free Segmentation on Continually Expanding Large Vocabulariescited by 20
- 2025Beyond Cosine Decay: On the effectiveness of Infinite Learning Rate Schedule for Continual Pre-trainingcited by 7
- 2024Premonition: Using Generative Models to Preempt Future Data Changes in Continual Learningcited by 5
- 2024Conformal-in-the-Loop for Learning with Imbalanced Noisy Datacited by 0
- 2025Beyond Cosine Decay: On the effectiveness of Infinite Learning Rate Schedule for Continual Pre-training4 Mar 2025
- 2024Conformal-in-the-Loop for Learning with Imbalanced Noisy Data4 Nov 2024
- 2024kNN-CLIP: Retrieval Enables Training-Free Segmentation on Continually Expanding Large Vocabularies15 Apr 2024
- 2024No "Zero-Shot" Without Exponential Data: Pretraining Concept Frequency Determines Multimodal Model Performance4 Apr 2024
- 2024Premonition: Using Generative Models to Preempt Future Data Changes in Continual Learning12 Mar 2024