mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Polynomial-Time Solutions for ReLU Network Training: A Complexity Classification via Max-Cut and Zonotopes

arXiv 2311.10972 ↗First posted 18 Nov 2023cs.LG cs.CC stat.MLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We investigate the complexity of training a two-layer ReLU neural network with weight decay regularization. Previous research has shown that the optimal solution of this problem can be found by solving a standard cone-constrained convex program. Using this convex formulation, we prove that the hardness of approximation of ReLU networks not only mirrors the complexity of the Max-Cut problem but also, in certain special cases, exactly corresponds to it. In particular, when ε≤√84/83-1≈ 0.006, we show that it is NP-hard to find an approximate global optimizer of the ReLU network objective with relative error ε with respect to the objective value. Moreover, we develop a randomized algorithm which mirrors the Goemans-Williamson rounding of semidefinite Max-Cut relaxations. To provide polynomial-time approximations, we classify training datasets into three categories: (i) For orthogonal separable datasets, a precise solution can be obtained in polynomial-time. (ii) When there is a negative correlation between samples of different classes, we give a polynomial-time approximation with relative error √π/2-1≈ 0.253. (iii) For general datasets, the degree to which the problem can be approximated in polynomial-time is governed by a geometric factor that controls the diameter of two zonotopes intrinsic to the dataset. To our knowledge, these results present the first polynomial-time approximation guarantees along with first hardness of approximation results for regularized ReLU networks.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Nov 2023.

Builds on

18 of 26 references.

References · 18

  1. 2016Understanding Deep Neural Networks with Rectified Linear Unitscited by 257
  2. 2020Neural Networks are Convex Regularizers: Exact Polynomial-time Convex Optimization Formulations for Two-layer Networkscited by 98
  3. 2017Learning One-hidden-layer Neural Networks with Landscape Designcited by 81
  4. 2017SGD Learns Over-parameterized Networks that Provably Generalize on Linearly Separable Datacited by 79
  5. 2020Revealing the Structure of Deep Neural Networks via Convex Dualitycited by 54
  6. 2020Convex Geometry and Duality of Over-parameterized Neural Networkscited by 49
  7. 2020Tight Hardness Results for Training Depth-2 ReLU Networkscited by 35
  8. 2018Learning Two Layer Rectified Neural Networks in Polynomial Timecited by 31
  9. 2022Hardness of Noise-Free Learning for Two-Hidden-Layer Neural Networkscited by 28
  10. 2021From Local Pseudorandom Generators to Hardness of Learningcited by 24
  11. 2018Complexity of Training ReLU Neural Networkcited by 23
  12. 2023Training Neural Networks is NP-Hard in Fixed Dimensioncited by 23
6 more
  1. 2018Learning Two-layer Neural Networks with Symmetric Inputscited by 22
  2. 2021Efficient Algorithms for Learning Depth-2 Neural Networks with General ReLU Activationscited by 15
  3. 2022Training Fully Connected Neural Networks is existsℝ-Completecited by 15
  4. 2023Computational Complexity of Learning Neural Networks: Smoothness and Degeneracycited by 10
  5. 2021Parallel Deep Neural Networks Have Zero Duality Gapcited by 9
  6. 2020Implicit Convex Regularizers of CNN Architectures: Convex Optimization of Two- and Three-Layer Networks in Polynomial Timecited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2.

2 papers.