Computational Complexity of Learning Neural Networks: Smoothness and Degeneracy
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Understanding when neural networks can be learned efficiently is a fundamental question in learning theory. Existing hardness results suggest that assumptions on both the input distribution and the network's weights are necessary for obtaining efficient algorithms. Moreover, it was previously shown that depth-2 networks can be efficiently learned under the assumptions that the input distribution is Gaussian, and the weight matrix is non-degenerate. In this work, we study whether such assumptions may suffice for learning deeper networks and prove negative results. We show that learning depth-3 ReLU networks under the Gaussian input distribution is hard even in the smoothed-analysis framework, where a random noise is added to the network's parameters. It implies that learning depth-3 ReLU networks under the Gaussian distribution is hard even if the weight matrices are non-degenerate. Moreover, we consider depth-2 networks, and show hardness of learning in the smoothed-analysis framework, where both the network parameters and the input distribution are smoothed. Our hardness results are under a well-studied assumption on the existence of local pseudorandom generators.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Feb 2023.
Builds on
27 of 52 references.
References · 27
- 2017Recovery Guarantees for One-hidden-layer Neural Networkscited by 94
- 2017Learning One-hidden-layer Neural Networks with Landscape Designcited by 81
- 2020Superpolynomial Lower Bounds for Learning One-Layer Neural Networks using Gradient Descentcited by 58
- 2020Near-Optimal SQ Lower Bounds for Agnostically Learning Halfspaces and ReLUs under Gaussian Marginalscited by 57
- 2020Statistical-Query Lower Bounds via Functional Gradientscited by 50
- 2020Algorithms and SQ Lower Bounds for PAC Learning One-Hidden-Layer ReLU Networkscited by 49
- 2020Smoothed Analysis of Online and Differentially Private Learningcited by 47
- 2016Reliably Learning the ReLU in Polynomial Timecited by 36
- 2020Tight Hardness Results for Training Depth-2 ReLU Networkscited by 35
- 2019Time/Accuracy Tradeoffs for Learning a ReLU with respect to Gaussian Marginalscited by 32
- 2018Learning Two Layer Rectified Neural Networks in Polynomial Timecited by 31
- 2015Learning Mixtures of Gaussians in High Dimensionscited by 29
15 more
- 2020Small Covers for Near-Zero Sets of Polynomials and Learning Latent Variable Modelscited by 28
- 2022Hardness of Noise-Free Learning for Two-Hidden-Layer Neural Networkscited by 28
- 2016Distribution-Specific Hardness of Learning Neural Networkscited by 27
- 2020Learning Deep ReLU Networks Is Fixed-Parameter Tractablecited by 26
- 2021From Local Pseudorandom Generators to Hardness of Learningcited by 24
- 2018Learning Two-layer Neural Networks with Symmetric Inputscited by 22
- 2014Complexity theoretic limitations on learning DNF'scited by 21
- 2013Smoothed Analysis of Tensor Decompositionscited by 19
- 2017On the Complexity of Learning Neural Networkscited by 18
- 2018Gradient Descent for One-Hidden-Layer Neural Networks: Polynomial Convergence and SQ Lower Boundscited by 18
- 2015ℓ1-regularized Neural Networks are Improperly Learnable in Polynomial Timecited by 16
- 2020Hardness of Learning Neural Networks with Natural Weightscited by 15
- 2021Efficient Algorithms for Learning Depth-2 Neural Networks with General ReLU Activationscited by 15
- 2019ID3 Learns Juntas for Smoothed Product Distributionscited by 13
- 2018Smoothed Analysis in Unsupervised Learning via Decouplingcited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.
10 papers.
- 2024Provably learning a multi-head attention layercited by 21
- 2023Provable Guarantees for Neural Networks via Gradient Feature Learningcited by 14
- 2024Smoothed Analysis for Learning Concepts with Low Intrinsic Dimensioncited by 11
- 2024Exploration is Harder than Prediction: Cryptographically Separating Reinforcement Learning from Supervised Learningcited by 6
- 2026Positive Distribution Shift as a Framework for Understanding Tractable Learningcited by 3
- 2023Most Neural Networks Are Almost Learnablecited by 2
- 2023Polynomial-Time Solutions for ReLU Network Training: A Complexity Classification via Max-Cut and Zonotopescited by 2
- 2025On the Hardness of Learning Regular Expressionscited by 2
- 2026Exploiting Subgradient Sparsity in Max-Plus Neural Networkscited by 1
- 2026Random Parameter Noise Does Not Make Exact ReLU Verification Easycited by 1
- 2026Random Parameter Noise Does Not Make Exact ReLU Verification Easy15 Jul 2026
- 2026Exploiting Subgradient Sparsity in Max-Plus Neural Networks4 Mar 2026
- 2026Positive Distribution Shift as a Framework for Understanding Tractable Learning9 Feb 2026
- 2025On the Hardness of Learning Regular Expressions6 Oct 2025
- 2024Smoothed Analysis for Learning Concepts with Low Intrinsic Dimension1 Jul 2024
- 2024Exploration is Harder than Prediction: Cryptographically Separating Reinforcement Learning from Supervised Learning4 Apr 2024
- 2024Provably learning a multi-head attention layer6 Feb 2024
- 2023Polynomial-Time Solutions for ReLU Network Training: A Complexity Classification via Max-Cut and Zonotopes18 Nov 2023
- 2023Provable Guarantees for Neural Networks via Gradient Feature Learning19 Oct 2023
- 2023Most Neural Networks Are Almost Learnable25 May 2023