mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Tight Hardness Results for Training Depth-2 ReLU Networks

arXiv 2011.13550 ↗First posted 27 Nov 2020cs.LG cs.CC cs.DScited by 35

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We prove several hardness results for training depth-2 neural networks with the ReLU activation function; these networks are simply weighted sums (that may include negative coefficients) of ReLUs. Our goal is to output a depth-2 neural network that minimizes the square loss with respect to a given training set. We prove that this problem is NP-hard already for a network with a single ReLU. We also prove NP-hardness for outputting a weighted sum of k ReLUs minimizing the squared error (for k>1) even in the realizable setting (i.e., when the labels are consistent with an unknown depth-2 ReLU network). We are also able to obtain lower bounds on the running time in terms of the desired additive error ε. To obtain our lower bounds, we use the Gap Exponential Time Hypothesis (Gap-ETH) as well as a new hypothesis regarding the hardness of approximating the well known Densest kappa-Subgraph problem in subexponential time (these hypotheses are used separately in proving different lower bounds). For example, we prove that under reasonable hardness assumptions, any proper learning algorithm for finding the best fitting ReLU must run in time exponential in 1/ε2. Together with a previous work regarding improperly learning a ReLU (Goel et al., COLT'17), this implies the first separation between proper and improper algorithms for learning a ReLU. We also study the problem of properly learning a depth-2 network of ReLUs with bounded weights giving new (worst-case) upper bounds on the running time needed to learn such networks both in the realizable and agnostic settings. Our upper bounds on the running time essentially matches our lower bounds in terms of the dependency on ε.

Key facts. Cited by 35 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 27 Nov 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 10; 2022: 2; 2023: 8; 2024: 4; 2025: 5; 2026: 6.

35 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021Towards Lower Bounds on the Depth of ReLU Neural Networkscited by 55
  2. 2023When Deep Learning Meets Polyhedral Theory: A Surveycited by 39
  3. 2023Lower Bounds on the Depth of Integral ReLU Neural Networks via Lattice Polytopescited by 36
  4. 2021Early-stopped neural networks are consistentcited by 34
  5. 2021From Local Pseudorandom Generators to Hardness of Learningcited by 24
  6. 2023Training Neural Networks is NP-Hard in Fixed Dimensioncited by 23
  7. 2021The Computational Complexity of ReLU Network Training Parameterized by Data Dimensionalitycited by 22
  8. 2023Dissecting Chain-of-Thought: Compositionality through In-Context Filtering and Learningcited by 19
  9. 2025On the Expressiveness of Rational ReLU Neural Networks With Bounded Depthcited by 18
  10. 2021Learning a Single Neuron with Bias Using Gradient Descentcited by 17
  11. 2022Training Fully Connected Neural Networks is existsℝ-Completecited by 15
  12. 2021Path Regularization: A Convexity and Sparsity Inducing Regularization for Parallel ReLU Networkscited by 14
23 more
  1. 2021Neural networks with linear threshold activations: structure and algorithmscited by 12
  2. 2021ReLU Neural Networks of Polynomial Size for Exact Maximum Flow Computationcited by 11
  3. 2024Convex Relaxations of ReLU Neural Networks Approximate Global Optima in Polynomial Timecited by 11
  4. 2025Depth-Bounds for Neural Networks via the Braid Arrangementcited by 11
  5. 2023Computational Complexity of Learning Neural Networks: Smoothness and Degeneracycited by 10
  6. 2023Finite-Sample Analysis of Learning High-Dimensional Single ReLU Neuroncited by 8
  7. 2025The Computational Complexity of Counting Linear Regions in ReLU Neural Networkscited by 7
  8. 2021Robust Generalization of Quadratic Neural Networks via Function Identificationcited by 5
  9. 2024Linear Bellman Completeness Suffices for Efficient Online Reinforcement Learning with Few Actionscited by 4
  10. 2022A Combinatorial Perspective on the Optimization of Shallow ReLU Networkscited by 3
  11. 2023Complexity of Neural Network Training and ETR: Extensions with Effectively Continuous Functionscited by 3
  12. 2023Polynomial-Time Solutions for ReLU Network Training: A Complexity Classification via Max-Cut and Zonotopescited by 2
  13. 2026Weight Clipping for Robust Conformal Inference under Unbounded Covariate Shiftscited by 2
  14. 2026New Complexity-Theoretic Frontiers of Tractability for Neural Network Trainingcited by 2
  15. 2024Generalizability of Memorization Neural Networkscited by 1
  16. 2026Online Realizable Regression and Applications for ReLU Networkscited by 1
  17. 2021Training Neural Networks is existsmathbb R-completecited by 0
  18. 2024Absence of Closed-Form Descriptions for Gradient Flow in Two-Layer Narrow Networkscited by 0
  19. 2025Deep-ICE: the first globally optimal algorithm for minimizing 0-1 loss in two-layer ReLU and maxout networkscited by 0
  20. 2025Model Fusion via Retrofittingcited by 0
  21. 2026Why ReLU? A Bit-Model Dichotomy for Deep Network Trainingcited by 0
  22. 2026How (and when) can you fit examples to logic-based hypothesis classes over infinite structures?cited by 0
  23. 2026Binary Quantized Neural Network Training Is W[1]-Hard Parameterized by Input and Output Dimensionscited by 0