mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Bridging Data-Driven and Knowledge-Driven Approaches for Safety-Critical Scenario Generation in Automated Vehicle Validation

arXiv 2311.10937 ↗First posted 18 Nov 2023cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Automated driving vehicles~(ADV) promise to enhance driving efficiency and safety, yet they face intricate challenges in safety-critical scenarios. As a result, validating ADV within generated safety-critical scenarios is essential for both development and performance evaluations. This paper investigates the complexities of employing two major scenario-generation solutions: data-driven and knowledge-driven methods. Data-driven methods derive scenarios from recorded datasets, efficiently generating scenarios by altering the existing behavior or trajectories of traffic participants but often falling short in considering ADV perception; knowledge-driven methods provide effective coverage through expert-designed rules, but they may lead to inefficiency in generating safety-critical scenarios within that coverage. To overcome these challenges, we introduce BridgeGen, a safety-critical scenario generation framework, designed to bridge the benefits of both methodologies. Specifically, by utilizing ontology-based techniques, BridgeGen models the five scenario layers in the operational design domain (ODD) from knowledge-driven methods, ensuring broad coverage, and incorporating data-driven strategies to efficiently generate safety-critical scenarios. An optimized scenario generation toolkit is developed within BridgeGen. This expedites the crafting of safety-critical scenarios through a combination of traditional optimization and reinforcement learning schemes. Extensive experiments conducted using Carla simulator demonstrate the effectiveness of BridgeGen in generating diverse safety-critical scenarios.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Nov 2023.

Builds on

18 of 51 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  2. 2017CARLA: An Open Urban Driving Simulatorcited by 2,449
  3. 2019A Theoretical Analysis of Deep Q-Learningcited by 215
  4. 2018Distributed Distributional Deterministic Policy Gradientscited by 199
  5. 2021Generating Useful Accident-Prone Driving Scenarios via a Learned Traffic Priorcited by 139
  6. 2022KING: Generating Safety-Critical Driving Scenarios for Robust Imitation via Kinematics Gradientscited by 96
  7. 2018Scenic: A Language for Scenario Specification and Scene Generationcited by 83
  8. 2017Virtual to Real Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Drivingcited by 80
  9. 2017Ontology based Scene Creation for the Development of Automated Vehiclescited by 40
  10. 2020Scenic: A Language for Scenario Specification and Data Generationcited by 40
  11. 2016Learning a Driving Simulatorcited by 33
  12. 2021Criticality Metrics for Automated Driving: A Review and Suitability Analysis of the State of the Artcited by 31
6 more
  1. 2022One Ontology to Rule Them All: Corner Case Scenarios for Autonomous Drivingcited by 16
  2. 2022Using Ontologies for the Formalization and Recognition of Criticality for Automated Drivingcited by 12
  3. 2023A Comprehensive Review on Ontologies for Scenario-based Testing in the Context of Autonomous Drivingcited by 5
  4. 2020Towards an Ontology for Scenario Definition for the Assessment of Automated Vehicles: An Object-Oriented Frameworkcited by 4
  5. 2021Intersection focused Situation Coverage-based Verification and Validation Framework for Autonomous Vehicles Implemented in CARLAcited by 4
  6. 2022Machine Learning Testing in an ADAS Case Study Using Simulation-Integrated Bio-Inspired Search-Based Testingcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

3 papers.