mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Criticality Metrics for Automated Driving: A Review and Suitability Analysis of the State of the Art

arXiv 2108.02403 ↗First posted 5 Aug 2021cs.RO cs.SEcited by 30

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The large-scale deployment of automated vehicles on public roads has the potential to vastly change the transportation modalities of today's society. Although this pursuit has been initiated decades ago, there still exist open challenges in reliably ensuring that such vehicles operate safely in open contexts. While functional safety is a well-established concept, the question of measuring the behavioral safety of a vehicle remains subject to research. One way to both objectively and computationally analyze traffic conflicts is the development and utilization of so-called criticality metrics. Contemporary approaches have leveraged the potential of criticality metrics in various applications related to automated driving, e.g. for computationally assessing the dynamic risk or filtering large data sets to build scenario catalogs. As a prerequisite to systematically choose adequate criticality metrics for such applications, we extensively review the state of the art of criticality metrics, their properties, and their applications in the context of automated driving. Based on this review, we propose a suitability analysis as a methodical tool to be used by practitioners. Both the proposed method and the state of the art review can then be harnessed to select well-suited measurement tools that cover an application's requirements, as demonstrated by an exemplary execution of the analysis. Ultimately, efficient, valid, and reliable measurements of an automated vehicle's safety performance are a key requirement for demonstrating its trustworthiness.

Key facts. Cited by 30 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 Aug 2021.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 4; 2024: 9; 2025: 9; 2026: 6.

30 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2022Using Ontologies for the Formalization and Recognition of Criticality for Automated Drivingcited by 12
  2. 2023From Model-Based to Data-Driven Simulation: Challenges and Trends in Autonomous Drivingcited by 6
  3. 2024LSM: A Comprehensive Metric for Assessing the Safety of Lane Detection Systems in Autonomous Drivingcited by 4
  4. 2025CLICv2: Image Complexity Representation via Content Invariance Contrastive Learningcited by 4
  5. 2023A Counterfactual Safety Margin Perspective on the Scoring of Autonomous Vehicles' Riskinesscited by 3
  6. 2023Bridging Data-Driven and Knowledge-Driven Approaches for Safety-Critical Scenario Generation in Automated Vehicle Validationcited by 3
  7. 2024Investigating Driving Interactions: A Robust Multi-Agent Simulation Framework for Autonomous Vehiclescited by 3
  8. 2024Accurately Predicting Probabilities of Safety-Critical Rare Events for Intelligent Systemscited by 3
  9. 2024An Approach to Systematic Data Acquisition and Data-Driven Simulation for the Safety Testing of Automated Driving Functionscited by 3
  10. 2024A Unified Probabilistic Approach to Traffic Conflict Detectioncited by 3
  11. 2022Grasping Causality for the Explanation of Criticality for Automated Drivingcited by 2
  12. 2024Efficient Data Representation for Motion Forecasting: A Scene-Specific Trajectory Set Approachcited by 2
18 more
  1. 2024Edge Case Detection in Automated Driving: Methods, Challenges, and Future Directionscited by 2
  2. 2024Traffic and Safety Rule Compliance of Humans in Diverse Driving Situationscited by 2
  3. 2024CRASH: Challenging Reinforcement-Learning Based Adversarial Scenarios For Safety Hardeningcited by 2
  4. 2025Reinforcement Learning for Testing Interdependent Requirements in Autonomous Vehicles: An Empirical Studycited by 2
  5. 2025Learning collision risk proactively from naturalistic driving data at scalecited by 2
  6. 2025Criticality Metrics for Relevance Classification in Safety Evaluation of Object Detection in Automated Drivingcited by 2
  7. 2026Can Attribution Predict Risk? From Multi-View Attribution to Planning Risk Signals in End-to-End Autonomous Drivingcited by 2
  8. 2025Navigating the Edge with the State-of-the-Art Insights into Corner Case Identification and Generation for Enhanced Autonomous Vehicle Safetycited by 1
  9. 2025Advancing Autonomous Driving System Testing: Demands, Challenges, and Future Directionscited by 1
  10. 2026Risk-Controllable Multi-View Diffusion for Driving Scenario Generationcited by 1
  11. 2023Conservative Estimation of Perception Relevance of Dynamic Objects for Safe Trajectories in Automotive Scenarioscited by 0
  12. 2025Improving AEBS Validation Through Objective Intervention Classification Leveraging the Prediction Divergence Principlecited by 0
  13. 2025Bayesian Optimization applied for accelerated Virtual Validation of the Autonomous Driving Functioncited by 0
  14. 2025From Real-World Traffic Data to Relevant Critical Scenarioscited by 0
  15. 2026Effort-Based Criticality Metrics for Evaluating 3D Perception Errors in Autonomous Drivingcited by 0
  16. 2026CooperDrive: Enhancing Driving Decisions Through Cooperative Perceptioncited by 0
  17. 2026Do Not Forget the Obvious - RISC: A Risk-Informed Slice-Coverage Protocol for Safe Autonomous Drivingcited by 0
  18. 2026Scenario-Independent Criticality Assessment and Prediction for Vulnerable Road Users in Autonomous Drivingcited by 0