mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

SelfEval: Leveraging the discriminative nature of generative models for evaluation

arXiv 2311.10708 ↗First posted 17 Nov 2023cs.CV cs.LGcited by 5

On the map: Diffusion models → Image generation, text-to-image and editing

Abstract (arXiv)

We present an automated way to evaluate the text alignment of text-to-image generative diffusion models using standard image-text recognition datasets. Our method, called SelfEval, uses the generative model to compute the likelihood of real images given text prompts, and the likelihood can be used to perform recognition tasks with the generative model. We evaluate generative models on standard datasets created for multimodal text-image discriminative learning and assess fine-grained aspects of their performance: attribute binding, color recognition, counting, shape recognition, spatial understanding. Existing automated metrics rely on an external pretrained model like CLIP (VLMs) or LLMs, and are sensitive to the exact pretrained model and its limitations. SelfEval sidesteps these issues, and to the best of our knowledge, is the first automated metric to show a high degree of agreement for measuring text-faithfulness with the gold-standard human evaluations across multiple generative models, benchmarks and evaluation metrics. SelfEval also reveals that generative models showcase competitive recognition performance on challenging tasks such as Winoground image-score compared to discriminative models. We hope SelfEval enables easy and reliable automated evaluation for diffusion models.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Image generation, text-to-image and editing, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 35 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Nov 2023.

Builds on

35 of 42 references.

Closest ancestors · 8

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023Your Diffusion Model is Secretly a Zero-Shot Classifier28 Mar
  2. 2023Text-to-Image Diffusion Models are Zero-Shot Classifiers27 Mar
  3. 2023Adding Conditional Control to Text-to-Image Diffusion Models10 Feb
  4. 2023GLIGEN: Open-Set Grounded Text-to-Image Generation17 Jan
  5. 2022InstructPix2Pix: Learning to Follow Image Editing Instructions17 Nov
  6. 2022Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language Understanding23 May
  7. 2022Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latents13 Apr
  8. 2021GLIDE: Towards Photorealistic Image Generation and Editing with Text-Guided Diffusion Models20 Dec

Other references · 27

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  3. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
  4. 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,863
  5. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  6. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  7. 2020Denoising Diffusion Implicit Modelscited by 9,781
  8. 2021Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesiscited by 8,255
  9. 2015Deep Unsupervised Learning using Nonequilibrium Thermodynamicscited by 7,058
  10. 2022Scalable Diffusion Models with Transformerscited by 6,054
  11. 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,627
  12. 2017Neural Discrete Representation Learningcited by 4,712
15 more
  1. 2019Generative Modeling by Estimating Gradients of the Data Distributioncited by 4,101
  2. 2016Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotationscited by 2,656
  3. 2021CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioningcited by 2,424
  4. 2015Unsupervised Representation Learning with Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 2,054
  5. 2023Zero-1-to-3: Zero-shot One Image to 3D Objectcited by 1,489
  6. 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,457
  7. 2022When and why vision-language models behave like bags-of-words, and what to do about it?cited by 610
  8. 2023ViperGPT: Visual Inference via Python Execution for Reasoningcited by 603
  9. 2022Winoground: Probing Vision and Language Models for Visio-Linguistic Compositionalitycited by 529
  10. 2022Visual Programming: Compositional visual reasoning without trainingcited by 516
  11. 2023TIFA: Accurate and Interpretable Text-to-Image Faithfulness Evaluation with Question Answeringcited by 428
  12. 2022Does CLIP Bind Concepts? Probing Compositionality in Large Image Modelscited by 102
  13. 2023LLMScore: Unveiling the Power of Large Language Models in Text-to-Image Synthesis Evaluationcited by 87
  14. 2023Visual Programming for Text-to-Image Generation and Evaluationcited by 54
  15. 2022Mutual Information Divergence: A Unified Metric for Multimodal Generative Modelscited by 35

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 4.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2022Human Evaluation of Text-to-Image Models on a Multi-Task Benchmark
  2. 2024EvalMuse-40K: A Reliable and Fine-Grained Benchmark with Comprehensive Human Annotations for Text-to-Image Generation Model Evaluation
  3. 2022MAUVE Scores for Generative Models: Theory and Practice
  4. 2023GenEval: An Object-Focused Framework for Evaluating Text-to-Image Alignment
  5. 2025Self-Evaluation Unlocks Any-Step Text-to-Image Generation
  6. 2025M3T2IBench: A Large-Scale Multi-Category, Multi-Instance, Multi-Relation Text-to-Image Benchmark
  7. 2024FlashEval: Towards Fast and Accurate Evaluation of Text-to-image Diffusion Generative Models
  8. 2023Synthetic Data from Diffusion Models Improves ImageNet Classification