mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Interpreting User Requests in the Context of Natural Language Standing Instructions

arXiv 2311.09796 ↗First posted 16 Nov 2023cs.CL cs.AIcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Users of natural language interfaces, generally powered by Large Language Models (LLMs),often must repeat their preferences each time they make a similar request. We describe an approach to LLM-based dialogue modeling in which persistent user constraints and preferences -- collectively termed standing instructions -- as additional context for such interfaces. For example, when a user states "I'm hungry", a previously expressed preference for Persian food can be automatically added to the LLM prompt, influencing the search for relevant restaurants. We develop NLSI, a language-to-program dataset consisting of over 2.4K dialogues spanning 17 domains, where each dialogue is paired with a user profile (a set of users specific standing instructions) and corresponding structured representations (API calls). A key challenge in NLSI is to identify which subset of the standing instructions is applicable to a given dialogue. NLSI contains diverse phenomena, from simple preferences to interdependent instructions such as triggering a hotel search whenever the user is booking tickets to an event. We conduct experiments on NLSI using prompting with large language models and various retrieval approaches, achieving a maximum of 44.7% exact match on API prediction. Our results demonstrate the challenges in identifying the relevant standing instructions and their interpretation into API calls.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Nov 2023.

Builds on

31 of 50 references.

References · 31

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  3. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  4. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  5. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
  6. 2023ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIscited by 1,880
  7. 2018Know What You Don't Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuADcited by 1,538
  8. 2021Unsupervised Dense Information Retrieval with Contrastive Learningcited by 1,203
  9. 2021CodeT5: Identifier-aware Unified Pre-trained Encoder-Decoder Models for Code Understanding and Generationcited by 890
  10. 2018Personalizing Dialogue Agents: I have a dog, do you have pets too?cited by 820
  11. 2022A Survey on In-context Learningcited by 717
  12. 2021Learning To Retrieve Prompts for In-Context Learningcited by 641
19 more
  1. 2019Towards Scalable Multi-domain Conversational Agents: The Schema-Guided Dialogue Datasetcited by 426
  2. 2023LaMP: When Large Language Models Meet Personalizationcited by 425
  3. 2023Trustworthy LLMs: a Survey and Guideline for Evaluating Large Language Models' Alignmentcited by 394
  4. 2014Memory Networkscited by 354
  5. 2015Towards AI-Complete Question Answering: A Set of Prerequisite Toy Taskscited by 309
  6. 2016A Persona-Based Neural Conversation Modelcited by 221
  7. 2023SatLM: Satisfiability-Aided Language Models Using Declarative Promptingcited by 100
  8. 2023CLIN: A Continually Learning Language Agent for Rapid Task Adaptation and Generalizationcited by 88
  9. 2023Answering Questions by Meta-Reasoning over Multiple Chains of Thoughtcited by 87
  10. 2020Like hiking? You probably enjoy nature: Persona-grounded Dialog with Commonsense Expansionscited by 49
  11. 2023ChatGPT for Zero-shot Dialogue State Tracking: A Solution or an Opportunity?cited by 38
  12. 2021Learning to Repair: Repairing model output errors after deployment using a dynamic memory of feedbackcited by 35
  13. 2017Personalization in Goal-Oriented Dialogcited by 28
  14. 2020Knowledge-Enhanced Personalized Review Generation with Capsule Graph Neural Networkcited by 14
  15. 2022Towards Fair Evaluation of Dialogue State Tracking by Flexible Incorporation of Turn-level Performancescited by 13
  16. 2022BenchCLAMP: A Benchmark for Evaluating Language Models on Syntactic and Semantic Parsingcited by 12
  17. 2019Learning to Learn Semantic Parsers from Natural Language Supervisioncited by 7
  18. 2022Ontologically Faithful Generation of Non-Player Character Dialoguescited by 7
  19. 2022DialGuide: Aligning Dialogue Model Behavior with Developer Guidelinescited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

5 papers.