Evaluating Concurrent Robustness of Language Models Across Diverse Challenge Sets
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Language models, characterized by their black-box nature, often hallucinate and display sensitivity to input perturbations, causing concerns about trust. To enhance trust, it is imperative to gain a comprehensive understanding of the model's failure modes and develop effective strategies to improve their performance. In this study, we introduce a methodology designed to examine how input perturbations affect language models across various scales, including pre-trained models and large language models (LLMs). Utilizing fine-tuning, we enhance the model's robustness to input perturbations. Additionally, we investigate whether exposure to one perturbation enhances or diminishes the model's performance with respect to other perturbations. To address robustness against multiple perturbations, we present three distinct fine-tuning strategies. Furthermore, we broaden the scope of our methodology to encompass large language models (LLMs) by leveraging a chain of thought (CoT) prompting approach augmented with exemplars. We employ the Tabular-NLI task to showcase how our proposed strategies adeptly train a robust model, enabling it to address diverse perturbations while maintaining accuracy on the original dataset. https://msin-infotabs.github.io/
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 44 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Nov 2023.
Builds on
44 of 68 references.
References · 44
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
- 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,355
- 2018Spider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Taskcited by 1,120
- 2020Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckListcited by 979
- 2019Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inferencecited by 864
- 2019Adversarial NLI: A New Benchmark for Natural Language Understandingcited by 798
- 2013An Empirical Investigation of Catastrophic Forgetting in Gradient-Based Neural Networkscited by 711
- 2020Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningcited by 504
32 more
- 2020BERT-ATTACK: Adversarial Attack Against BERT Using BERTcited by 488
- 2021Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing via Large Pre-Trained Language Models: A Surveycited by 457
- 2019TabFact: A Large-scale Dataset for Table-based Fact Verificationcited by 425
- 2020Dataset Cartography: Mapping and Diagnosing Datasets with Training Dynamicscited by 423
- 2018TextBugger: Generating Adversarial Text Against Real-world Applicationscited by 376
- 2020GraPPa: Grammar-Augmented Pre-Training for Table Semantic Parsingcited by 171
- 2020Recall and Learn: Fine-tuning Deep Pretrained Language Models with Less Forgettingcited by 169
- 2019Do NLP Models Know Numbers? Probing Numeracy in Embeddingscited by 157
- 2023Understanding Catastrophic Forgetting in Language Models via Implicit Inferencecited by 138
- 2018Breaking NLI Systems with Sentences that Require Simple Lexical Inferencescited by 134
- 2020Adversarial Training for Large Neural Language Modelscited by 109
- 2021Measure and Improve Robustness in NLP Models: A Surveycited by 107
- 2021Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Language Models to Input Perturbationscited by 87
- 2020INFOTABS: Inference on Tables as Semi-structured Datacited by 84
- 2018Adversarial Examples that Fool both Computer Vision and Time-Limited Humanscited by 73
- 2020Understanding tables with intermediate pre-trainingcited by 68
- 2021Sample Selection for Fair and Robust Trainingcited by 48
- 2020CAT-Gen: Improving Robustness in NLP Models via Controlled Adversarial Text Generationcited by 43
- 2019Inoculation by Fine-Tuning: A Method for Analyzing Challenge Datasetscited by 41
- 2021SemEval-2021 Task 9: Fact Verification and Evidence Finding for Tabular Data in Scientific Documents (SEM-TAB-FACTS)cited by 35
- 2020Linguistically-Informed Transformations (LIT): A Method for Automatically Generating Contrast Setscited by 31
- 2020Unsupervised Alignment-based Iterative Evidence Retrieval for Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 24
- 2021Incorporating External Knowledge to Enhance Tabular Reasoningcited by 23
- 2022HyPe: Better Pre-trained Language Model Fine-tuning with Hidden Representation Perturbationcited by 11
- 2019Auto-completion for Data Cells in Relational Tablescited by 9
- 2021A Differentiable Language Model Adversarial Attack on Text Classifierscited by 9
- 2022Robust Fine-tuning via Perturbation and Interpolation from In-batch Instancescited by 6
- 2023Noisy Exemplars Make Large Language Models More Robust: A Domain-Agnostic Behavioral Analysiscited by 6
- 2023Towards Robust and Generalizable Training: An Empirical Study of Noisy Slot Filling for Input Perturbationscited by 5
- 2022Enhancing Tabular Reasoning with Pattern Exploiting Trainingcited by 3
- 2021TabPert: An Effective Platform for Tabular Perturbationcited by 2
- 2022Multi-Scales Data Augmentation Approach In Natural Language Inference For Artifacts Mitigation And Pre-Trained Model Optimizationcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
6 papers.
- 2024NTSEBENCH: Cognitive Reasoning Benchmark for Vision Language Modelscited by 9
- 2025TransientTables: Evaluating LLMs' Reasoning on Temporally Evolving Semi-structured Tablescited by 4
- 2025Evaluating Robustness of Monocular Depth Estimation with Procedural Scene Perturbationscited by 4
- 2026FragileFlow: Spectral Control of Correct-but-Fragile Predictions for Foundation Model Robustnesscited by 3
- 2024Improving QA Model Performance with Cartographic Inoculationcited by 1
- 2026Spontaneous Context Restoration: How Language Models Recover from Corrupted Inputscited by 0
- 2026Spontaneous Context Restoration: How Language Models Recover from Corrupted Inputs28 Sep 2026
- 2026FragileFlow: Spectral Control of Correct-but-Fragile Predictions for Foundation Model Robustness9 May 2026
- 2025Evaluating Robustness of Monocular Depth Estimation with Procedural Scene Perturbations1 Jul 2025
- 2025TransientTables: Evaluating LLMs' Reasoning on Temporally Evolving Semi-structured Tables2 Apr 2025
- 2024NTSEBENCH: Cognitive Reasoning Benchmark for Vision Language Models15 Jul 2024
- 2024Improving QA Model Performance with Cartographic Inoculation30 Jan 2024
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025FLUKE: A Linguistically-Driven and Task-Agnostic Framework for Robustness Evaluation
- 2024Improving the Robustness of Large Language Models via Consistency Alignment
- 2023Are Large Language Models Really Robust to Word-Level Perturbations?
- 2026Fragile Thoughts: How Large Language Models Handle Chain-of-Thought Perturbations
- 2025Robustness of Prompting: Enhancing Robustness of Large Language Models Against Prompting Attacks
- 2024Navigating the Safety Landscape: Measuring Risks in Finetuning Large Language Models
- 2026What Single-Prompt Accuracy Misses: A Multi-Variant Reliability Audit of Language Models
- 2026Measuring Stability and Failure Behavior in Language Models Under Structured Perturbations