mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

SABAF: Removing Strong Attribute Bias from Neural Networks with Adversarial Filtering

arXiv 2311.07141 ↗First posted 13 Nov 2023cs.LG cs.CYcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Ensuring a neural network is not relying on protected attributes (e.g., race, sex, age) for prediction is crucial in advancing fair and trustworthy AI. While several promising methods for removing attribute bias in neural networks have been proposed, their limitations remain under-explored. To that end, in this work, we mathematically and empirically reveal the limitation of existing attribute bias removal methods in presence of strong bias and propose a new method that can mitigate this limitation. Specifically, we first derive a general non-vacuous information-theoretical upper bound on the performance of any attribute bias removal method in terms of the bias strength, revealing that they are effective only when the inherent bias in the dataset is relatively weak. Next, we derive a necessary condition for the existence of any method that can remove attribute bias regardless of the bias strength. Inspired by this condition, we then propose a new method using an adversarial objective that directly filters out protected attributes in the input space while maximally preserving all other attributes, without requiring any specific target label. The proposed method achieves state-of-the-art performance in both strong and moderate bias settings. We provide extensive experiments on synthetic, image, and census datasets, to verify the derived theoretical bound and its consequences in practice, and evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed method in removing strong attribute bias.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 48 of its 73 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Nov 2023.

Builds on

48 of 73 references.

References · 48

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  4. 2018A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,986
  5. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
  6. 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,023
  7. 2017Improved Training of Wasserstein GANscited by 2,223
  8. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  9. 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,366
  10. 2018Learning deep representations by mutual information estimation and maximizationcited by 1,265
  11. 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,232
  12. 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 802
36 more
  1. 2015Deep Learning and the Information Bottleneck Principlecited by 793
  2. 2018MINE: Mutual Information Neural Estimationcited by 680
  3. 2017Wasserstein GANcited by 635
  4. 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 582
  5. 2021Just Train Twice: Improving Group Robustness without Training Group Informationcited by 522
  6. 2017Opening the Black Box of Deep Neural Networks via Informationcited by 494
  7. 2019Nuanced Metrics for Measuring Unintended Bias with Real Data for Text Classificationcited by 396
  8. 2020Environment Inference for Invariant Learningcited by 306
  9. 2018Learning Not to Learn: Training Deep Neural Networks with Biased Datacited by 255
  10. 2019Towards Fairness in Visual Recognition: Effective Strategies for Bias Mitigationcited by 252
  11. 2017AttGAN: Facial Attribute Editing by Only Changing What You Wantcited by 241
  12. 2020No Subclass Left Behind: Fine-Grained Robustness in Coarse-Grained Classification Problemscited by 208
  13. 2019Mitigate Bias in Face Recognition using Skewness-Aware Reinforcement Learningcited by 145
  14. 2019Inherent Tradeoffs in Learning Fair Representationscited by 144
  15. 2020Fair Attribute Classification through Latent Space De-biasingcited by 125
  16. 2021Learning Debiased Representation via Disentangled Feature Augmentationcited by 116
  17. 2018Turning a Blind Eye: Explicit Removal of Biases and Variation from Deep Neural Network Embeddingscited by 114
  18. 2021Counterfactual Generative Networkscited by 111
  19. 2019Generalizing to unseen domains via distribution matchingcited by 109
  20. 2021EnD: Entangling and Disentangling deep representations for bias correctioncited by 105
  21. 2018Fairness Under Unawareness: Assessing Disparity When Protected Class Is Unobservedcited by 94
  22. 2020Model Patching: Closing the Subgroup Performance Gap with Data Augmentationcited by 82
  23. 2022Vision Models Are More Robust And Fair When Pretrained On Uncurated Images Without Supervisioncited by 80
  24. 2021BiaSwap: Removing dataset bias with bias-tailored swapping augmentationcited by 70
  25. 2020Towards causal benchmarking of bias in face analysis algorithmscited by 64
  26. 2020Learning Meta Face Recognition in Unseen Domainscited by 61
  27. 2022Discover and Mitigate Unknown Biases with Debiasing Alternate Networkscited by 47
  28. 2021Learning Bias-Invariant Representation by Cross-Sample Mutual Information Minimizationcited by 32
  29. 2020Learning Unbiased Representations via Mutual Information Backpropagationcited by 25
  30. 2022You Only Need a Good Embeddings Extractor to Fix Spurious Correlationscited by 17
  31. 2022Epistemic Uncertainty-Weighted Loss for Visual Bias Mitigationcited by 11
  32. 2021Impossibility results for fair representationscited by 10
  33. 2022CAT: Controllable Attribute Translation for Fair Facial Attribute Classificationcited by 6
  34. 2021Information-Theoretic Bias Assessment Of Learned Representations Of Pretrained Face Recognitioncited by 5
  35. 2022PointFix: Learning to Fix Domain Bias for Robust Online Stereo Adaptationcited by 5
  36. 2023Information-Theoretic Bounds on The Removal of Attribute-Specific Bias From Neural Networkscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.