Changing the Kernel During Training Leads to Double Descent in Kernel Regression
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We investigate changing the bandwidth of a translational-invariant kernel during training when solving kernel regression with gradient descent. We present a theoretical bound on the out-of-sample generalization error that advocates for decreasing the bandwidth (and thus increasing the model complexity) during training. We further use the bound to show that kernel regression exhibits a double descent behavior when the model complexity is expressed as the minimum allowed bandwidth during training. Decreasing the bandwidth all the way to zero results in benign overfitting, and also circumvents the need for model selection. We demonstrate the double descent behavior on real and synthetic data and also demonstrate that kernel regression with a decreasing bandwidth outperforms that of a constant bandwidth, selected by cross-validation or marginal likelihood maximization. We finally apply our findings to neural networks, demonstrating that by modifying the neural tangent kernel (NTK) during training, making the NTK behave as if its bandwidth were decreasing to zero, we can make the network overfit more benignly, and converge in fewer iterations.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 38 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Nov 2023.
Builds on
38 of 70 references.
References · 38
- 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,597
- 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
- 2018Reconciling modern machine learning practice and the bias-variance trade-offcited by 919
- 2019Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data Hurtcited by 667
- 2017Deep Neural Networks as Gaussian Processescited by 617
- 2019On Exact Computation with an Infinitely Wide Neural Netcited by 572
- 2019Benign Overfitting in Linear Regressioncited by 544
- 2017Computing Nonvacuous Generalization Bounds for Deep (Stochastic) Neural Networks with Many More Parameters than Training Datacited by 527
- 2019Surprises in High-Dimensional Ridgeless Least Squares Interpolationcited by 508
- 2019The generalization error of random features regression: Precise asymptotics and double descent curvecited by 410
- 2018Gaussian Process Behaviour in Wide Deep Neural Networkscited by 314
- 2017High-dimensional dynamics of generalization error in neural networkscited by 238
26 more
- 2019SGD on Neural Networks Learns Functions of Increasing Complexitycited by 203
- 2018Just Interpolate: Kernel "Ridgeless" Regression Can Generalizecited by 190
- 2019On the Inductive Bias of Neural Tangent Kernelscited by 177
- 2019Graph Neural Tangent Kernel: Fusing Graph Neural Networks with Graph Kernelscited by 160
- 2019Tensor Programs I: Wide Feedforward or Recurrent Neural Networks of Any Architecture are Gaussian Processescited by 148
- 2018Deep Convolutional Networks as shallow Gaussian Processescited by 137
- 2020On the linearity of large non-linear models: when and why the tangent kernel is constantcited by 129
- 2020The Neural Tangent Kernel in High Dimensions: Triple Descent and a Multi-Scale Theory of Generalizationcited by 101
- 2018Overfitting or perfect fitting? Risk bounds for classification and regression rules that interpolatecited by 99
- 2018Improving DNN Robustness to Adversarial Attacks using Jacobian Regularizationcited by 88
- 2013Early stopping and non-parametric regression: An optimal data-dependent stopping rulecited by 86
- 2019Scaling description of generalization with number of parameters in deep learningcited by 83
- 2019A Model of Double Descent for High-dimensional Binary Linear Classificationcited by 81
- 2020On the Similarity between the Laplace and Neural Tangent Kernelscited by 76
- 2020The Recurrent Neural Tangent Kernelcited by 67
- 2020Kernel regression in high dimensions: Refined analysis beyond double descentcited by 39
- 2023A U-turn on Double Descent: Rethinking Parameter Counting in Statistical Learningcited by 32
- 2017Diving into the shallows: a computational perspective on large-scale shallow learningcited by 30
- 2023Mind the spikes: Benign overfitting of kernels and neural networks in fixed dimensioncited by 26
- 2022What Can the Neural Tangent Kernel Tell Us About Adversarial Robustness?cited by 21
- 2023Kernel interpolation generalizes poorlycited by 16
- 2019Double descent in the condition numbercited by 14
- 2022Evolution of Neural Tangent Kernels under Benign and Adversarial Trainingcited by 14
- 2021On the Generalization Power of Overfitted Two-Layer Neural Tangent Kernel Modelscited by 13
- 2023Controlling the Inductive Bias of Wide Neural Networks by Modifying the Kernel's Spectrumcited by 9
- 2023Fast Robust Kernel Regression through Sign Gradient Descent with Early Stoppingcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026A Rigorous, Tractable Measure of Model Complexitycited by 0
- 2026A Rigorous, Tractable Measure of Model Complexity20 May 2026