mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Can Foundation Models Watch, Talk and Guide You Step by Step to Make a Cake?

arXiv 2311.00738 ↗First posted 1 Nov 2023cs.AI cs.HCcited by 18

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Despite tremendous advances in AI, it remains a significant challenge to develop interactive task guidance systems that can offer situated, personalized guidance and assist humans in various tasks. These systems need to have a sophisticated understanding of the user as well as the environment, and make timely accurate decisions on when and what to say. To address this issue, we created a new multimodal benchmark dataset, Watch, Talk and Guide (WTaG) based on natural interaction between a human user and a human instructor. We further proposed two tasks: User and Environment Understanding, and Instructor Decision Making. We leveraged several foundation models to study to what extent these models can be quickly adapted to perceptually enabled task guidance. Our quantitative, qualitative, and human evaluation results show that these models can demonstrate fair performances in some cases with no task-specific training, but a fast and reliable adaptation remains a significant challenge. Our benchmark and baselines will provide a stepping stone for future work on situated task guidance.

Key facts. Cited by 18 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Nov 2023.

Builds on

23 of 46 references.

References · 23

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,310
  4. 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 3,961
  5. 2023RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Controlcited by 2,993
  6. 2023Kosmos-2: Grounding Multimodal Large Language Models to the Worldcited by 1,075
  7. 2022Language Models as Zero-Shot Planners: Extracting Actionable Knowledge for Embodied Agentscited by 1,029
  8. 2018Scaling Egocentric Vision: The EPIC-KITCHENS Datasetcited by 789
  9. 2019ALFRED: A Benchmark for Interpreting Grounded Instructions for Everyday Taskscited by 773
  10. 2021MERLOT: Multimodal Neural Script Knowledge Modelscited by 311
  11. 2022Assembly101: A Large-Scale Multi-View Video Dataset for Understanding Procedural Activitiescited by 284
  12. 2021A Survey of Human-in-the-loop for Machine Learningcited by 214
11 more
  1. 2021TEACh: Task-driven Embodied Agents that Chatcited by 194
  2. 2021Simple but Effective: CLIP Embeddings for Embodied AIcited by 191
  3. 2022MERLOT Reserve: Neural Script Knowledge through Vision and Language and Soundcited by 184
  4. 2023Vision-Language Models as Success Detectorscited by 138
  5. 2018Charades-Ego: A Large-Scale Dataset of Paired Third and First Person Videoscited by 127
  6. 2022DALL-E-Bot: Introducing Web-Scale Diffusion Models to Roboticscited by 105
  7. 2021MindCraft: Theory of Mind Modeling for Situated Dialogue in Collaborative Taskscited by 62
  8. 2020Situated and Interactive Multimodal Conversationscited by 35
  9. 2016Detecting Engagement in Egocentric Videocited by 13
  10. 2016Automated capture and delivery of assistive task guidance with an eyewear computer: The GlaciAR systemcited by 3
  11. 2022CAISE: Conversational Agent for Image Search and Editingcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 6; 2025: 6; 2026: 5.

18 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2025Proactive Assistant Dialogue Generation from Streaming Egocentric Videoscited by 22
  2. 2023Eliciting In-Context Learning in Vision-Language Models for Videos Through Curated Data Distributional Propertiescited by 21
  3. 2024What to Say and When to Say it: Live Fitness Coaching as a Testbed for Situated Interactioncited by 18
  4. 2024SIGMA: An Open-Source Interactive System for Mixed-Reality Task Assistance Researchcited by 8
  5. 2025Can Vision-Language Models Answer Face to Face Questions in the Real-World?cited by 7
  6. 2024HANDI: Hand-Centric Text-and-Image Conditioned Video Generationcited by 5
  7. 2024Transparent and Coherent Procedural Mistake Detectioncited by 4
  8. 2025Towards Effective Human-in-the-Loop Assistive AI Agentscited by 4
  9. 2026Harnessing Streaming Video in the Wildcited by 3
  10. 2024"Is This It?": Towards Ecologically Valid Benchmarks for Situated Collaborationcited by 2
  11. 2025Can Multi-Modal LLMs Provide Live Step-by-Step Task Guidance?cited by 2
  12. 2026Pro2Assist: Continuous Step-aware Proactive Assistance with Multi-modal Egocentric Perception for Long-horizon Procedural Taskscited by 2
6 more
  1. 2024POEM: Interactive Prompt Optimization for Enhancing Multimodal Reasoning of Large Language Modelscited by 1
  2. 2026Proactive Conversational Assistant for a Procedural Manual Task based on Audio and IMUcited by 1
  3. 2026GuideMe: Multi-Domain Task Guidance and Intervention in Streaming Videocited by 1
  4. 2025Temporally-Grounded Language Generation: Towards Real-Time Vision-Language Modelscited by 0
  5. 2025SigmaCollab: An Application-Driven Dataset for Physically Situated Collaborationcited by 0
  6. 2026Streaming Interventions: Can Video Large Language Models Correct Mistakes as They Occur?cited by 0