A Low-cost Strategic Monitoring Approach for Scalable and Interpretable Error Detection in Deep Neural Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present a highly compact run-time monitoring approach for deep computer vision networks that extracts selected knowledge from only a few (down to merely two) hidden layers, yet can efficiently detect silent data corruption originating from both hardware memory and input faults. Building on the insight that critical faults typically manifest as peak or bulk shifts in the activation distribution of the affected network layers, we use strategically placed quantile markers to make accurate estimates about the anomaly of the current inference as a whole. Importantly, the detector component itself is kept algorithmically transparent to render the categorization of regular and abnormal behavior interpretable to a human. Our technique achieves up to ~96% precision and ~98% recall of detection. Compared to state-of-the-art anomaly detection techniques, this approach requires minimal compute overhead (as little as 0.3% with respect to non-supervised inference time) and contributes to the explainability of the model.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Oct 2023.
Builds on
14 of 25 references.
References · 14
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
- 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
- 2019MMDetection: Open MMLab Detection Toolbox and Benchmarkcited by 1,385
- 2017On Detecting Adversarial Perturbationscited by 232
- 2019Terminal Brain Damage: Exposing the Graceless Degradation in Deep Neural Networks Under Hardware Fault Attackscited by 57
- 2019Outside the Box: Abstraction-Based Monitoring of Neural Networkscited by 36
- 2018Runtime Monitoring Neuron Activation Patternscited by 34
- 2019FT-ClipAct: Resilience Analysis of Deep Neural Networks and Improving their Fault Tolerance using Clipped Activationcited by 31
- 2022Object Detection in Autonomous Vehicles: Status and Open Challengescited by 14
- 2021Towards a Safety Case for Hardware Fault Tolerance in Convolutional Neural Networks Using Activation Range Supervisioncited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
6 papers.
- 2024A Flow-based Credibility Metric for Safety-critical Pedestrian Detectioncited by 2
- 2025Runtime Safety Monitoring of Deep Neural Networks for Perception: A Surveycited by 2
- 2024Global Clipper: Enhancing Safety and Reliability of Transformer-based Object Detection Modelscited by 1
- 2025FORTALESA: Fault-Tolerant Reconfigurable Systolic Array for DNN Inferencecited by 1
- 2026FLARE: One-Shot PE-Level Fault Localization in Systolic Arrays via Algebraic Test Vectorscited by 1
- 2025Explaining Unreliable Perception in Automated Driving: A Fuzzy-based Monitoring Approachcited by 0
- 2026FLARE: One-Shot PE-Level Fault Localization in Systolic Arrays via Algebraic Test Vectors9 May 2026
- 2025Runtime Safety Monitoring of Deep Neural Networks for Perception: A Survey8 Nov 2025
- 2025Explaining Unreliable Perception in Automated Driving: A Fuzzy-based Monitoring Approach20 May 2025
- 2025FORTALESA: Fault-Tolerant Reconfigurable Systolic Array for DNN Inference6 Mar 2025
- 2024Global Clipper: Enhancing Safety and Reliability of Transformer-based Object Detection Models5 Jun 2024
- 2024A Flow-based Credibility Metric for Safety-critical Pedestrian Detection12 Feb 2024