Counterfactually Probing Language Identity in Multilingual Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Techniques in causal analysis of language models illuminate how linguistic information is organized in LLMs. We use one such technique, AlterRep, a method of counterfactual probing, to explore the internal structure of multilingual models (mBERT and XLM-R). We train a linear classifier on a binary language identity task, to classify tokens between Language X and Language Y. Applying a counterfactual probing procedure, we use the classifier weights to project the embeddings into the null space and push the resulting embeddings either in the direction of Language X or Language Y. Then we evaluate on a masked language modeling task. We find that, given a template in Language X, pushing towards Language Y systematically increases the probability of Language Y words, above and beyond a third-party control language. But it does not specifically push the model towards translation-equivalent words in Language Y. Pushing towards Language X (the same direction as the template) has a minimal effect, but somewhat degrades these models. Overall, we take these results as further evidence of the rich structure of massive multilingual language models, which include both a language-specific and language-general component. And we show that counterfactual probing can be fruitfully applied to multilingual models.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Oct 2023.
Builds on
27 of 34 references.
References · 27
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,935
- 2019How multilingual is Multilingual BERT?cited by 645
- 2019Designing and Interpreting Probes with Control Taskscited by 640
- 2017Word Translation Without Parallel Datacited by 487
- 2020Null It Out: Guarding Protected Attributes by Iterative Nullspace Projectioncited by 455
- 2021Causal Abstractions of Neural Networkscited by 422
- 2020How Good is Your Tokenizer? On the Monolingual Performance of Multilingual Language Modelscited by 318
- 2019Beto, Bentz, Becas: The Surprising Cross-Lingual Effectiveness of BERTcited by 301
- 2020Information-Theoretic Probing for Linguistic Structurecited by 207
- 2020Are All Languages Created Equal in Multilingual BERT?cited by 207
- 2021Word Alignment by Fine-tuning Embeddings on Parallel Corporacited by 186
15 more
- 2019Emerging Cross-lingual Structure in Pretrained Language Modelscited by 181
- 2020Probing Pretrained Language Models for Lexical Semanticscited by 156
- 2021Multilingual LAMA: Investigating Knowledge in Multilingual Pretrained Language Modelscited by 132
- 2021Causal Analysis of Syntactic Agreement Mechanisms in Neural Language Modelscited by 131
- 2020Finding Universal Grammatical Relations in Multilingual BERTcited by 110
- 2020On the Language Neutrality of Pre-trained Multilingual Representationscited by 85
- 2017The IIT Bombay English-Hindi Parallel Corpuscited by 75
- 2020Analyzing the Source and Target Contributions to Predictions in Neural Machine Translationcited by 71
- 2021Counterfactual Interventions Reveal the Causal Effect of Relative Clause Representations on Agreement Predictioncited by 59
- 2022Probing for the Usage of Grammatical Numbercited by 59
- 2022Kernelized Concept Erasurecited by 48
- 2021Deep Subjecthood: Higher-Order Grammatical Features in Multilingual BERTcited by 41
- 2022Analyzing the Mono- and Cross-Lingual Pretraining Dynamics of Multilingual Language Modelscited by 32
- 2020It's not Greek to mBERT: Inducing Word-Level Translations from Multilingual BERTcited by 30
- 2021Attention Can Reflect Syntactic Structure (If You Let It)cited by 22
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.