mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Evaluating General-Purpose AI with Psychometrics

arXiv 2310.16379 ↗First posted 25 Oct 2023cs.AI cs.CYcited by 23

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Comprehensive and accurate evaluation of general-purpose AI systems such as large language models allows for effective mitigation of their risks and deepened understanding of their capabilities. Current evaluation methodology, mostly based on benchmarks of specific tasks, falls short of adequately assessing these versatile AI systems, as present techniques lack a scientific foundation for predicting their performance on unforeseen tasks and explaining their varying performance on specific task items or user inputs. Moreover, existing benchmarks of specific tasks raise growing concerns about their reliability and validity. To tackle these challenges, we suggest transitioning from task-oriented evaluation to construct-oriented evaluation. Psychometrics, the science of psychological measurement, provides a rigorous methodology for identifying and measuring the latent constructs that underlie performance across multiple tasks. We discuss its merits, warn against potential pitfalls, and propose a framework to put it into practice. Finally, we explore future opportunities of integrating psychometrics with the evaluation of general-purpose AI systems.

Key facts. Cited by 23 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 119 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Oct 2023.

Builds on

24 of 119 references.

References · 24

  1. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  2. 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 3,961
  3. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
  4. 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,579
  5. 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,970
  6. 2023A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Modelscited by 1,227
  7. 2019How Can We Know What Language Models Know?cited by 953
  8. 2022CodeGen: An Open Large Language Model for Code with Multi-Turn Program Synthesiscited by 876
  9. 2022Using cognitive psychology to understand GPT-3cited by 389
  10. 2023HaluEval: A Large-Scale Hallucination Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language Modelscited by 329
  11. 2020A Survey on Neural Network Interpretabilitycited by 291
  12. 2023Role-Play with Large Language Modelscited by 290
12 more
  1. 2022Emergent Analogical Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 239
  2. 2022Data Contamination: From Memorization to Exploitationcited by 234
  3. 2021Harms of Gender Exclusivity and Challenges in Non-Binary Representation in Language Technologiescited by 128
  4. 2021Towards a Science of Human-AI Decision Making: A Survey of Empirical Studiescited by 85
  5. 2023Moral Foundations of Large Language Modelscited by 84
  6. 2023How Robust is GPT-3.5 to Predecessors? A Comprehensive Study on Language Understanding Taskscited by 58
  7. 2023Emotional Intelligence of Large Language Modelscited by 58
  8. 2023Evaluating Evaluation Metrics: A Framework for Analyzing NLG Evaluation Metrics using Measurement Theorycited by 41
  9. 2022GEMv2: Multilingual NLG Benchmarking in a Single Line of Codecited by 36
  10. 2023Revealing the structure of language model capabilitiescited by 35
  11. 2023Evidence of interrelated cognitive-like capabilities in large language models: Indications of artificial general intelligence or achievement?cited by 26
  12. 2023Inferring Capabilities from Task Performance with Bayesian Triangulationcited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 9; 2025: 7; 2026: 7.

23 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2025Large Language Model Agent: A Survey on Methodology, Applications and Challengescited by 194
  2. 2024Evaluating Large Language Models with Psychometricscited by 22
  3. 2026Comparison requires valid measurement: Rethinking attack success rate comparisons in AI red teamingcited by 15
  4. 2025The Benchmarking Epistemology: Validity Theory for Evaluating Machine Learning Modelscited by 12
  5. 2024Evaluating AI Evaluation: Perils and Prospectscited by 11
  6. 2024Measuring the Measurers: Quality Evaluation of Hallucination Benchmarks for Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 8
  7. 2025A validity-guided workflow for robust large language model research in psychologycited by 8
  8. 2024Survey of Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Machine Learning Perspectivecited by 6
  9. 2024Evaluating Implicit Bias in Large Language Models by Attacking From a Psychometric Perspectivecited by 5
  10. 2024Improving the Validity and Practical Usefulness of AI/ML Evaluations Using an Estimands Frameworkcited by 4
  11. 2025Interactive Learning for LLM Reasoningcited by 4
  12. 2024Cognitive phantoms in LLMs through the lens of latent variablescited by 3
11 more
  1. 2025Beyond BFI: The CSI for Enhanced Reliability and Validity in Evaluating LLM Personality Traitscited by 2
  2. 2025MM-OPERA: Benchmarking Open-ended Association Reasoning for Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 2
  3. 2026Measuring What AI Systems Might Do: Towards A Measurement Science in AIcited by 2
  4. 2024Evolutionary Computation for the Design and Enrichment of General-Purpose Artificial Intelligence Systems: Survey and Prospectscited by 1
  5. 2025Position: AI Evaluations Should be Grounded on a Theory of Capabilitycited by 1
  6. 2026FairTree: Subgroup Fairness Auditing of Machine Learning Models with Bias-Variance Decompositioncited by 1
  7. 2024A Novel Psychometrics-Based Approach to Developing Professional Competency Benchmark for Large Language Modelscited by 0
  8. 2026Principles and Guidelines for Randomized Controlled Trials in AI Evaluationcited by 0
  9. 2026An Interpretable and Scalable Framework for Evaluating Large Language Modelscited by 0
  10. 2026Harmful Content Is Not Enough: Continuation Framing Moderates In-Context Emergent Misalignmentcited by 0
  11. 2026Accounting for Bias Enables Sustainable LLM Evaluationcited by 0