mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Beyond BFI: The CSI for Enhanced Reliability and Validity in Evaluating LLM Personality Traits

arXiv 2503.20182 ↗First posted 26 Mar 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As large language models (LLMs) increasingly function as human-like assistants exhibiting human-like personality traits, understanding their behavioral characteristics becomes essential for responsible AI development. However, existing evaluation efforts, which often adapt human psychological assessments such as the Big Five Inventory (BFI), face two significant limitations. First, these approaches often lack reliability, as minor prompt variations can lead to inconsistent test results. Second, the theoretical foundations of these tools, rooted in human studies, are misaligned with the computational nature of LLMs, thereby limiting their validity in predicting real-world model behavior. To address these limitations, we introduce the Core Sentiment Inventory (CSI), a novel personality trait evaluation instrument designed from the ground up and specifically tailored to the unique characteristics of LLMs. CSI covers both English and Chinese, that implicitly evaluates models' personality traits, providing insightful psychological portraits of LLMs. Extensive experiments demonstrate that: (1) CSI effectively captures nuanced behavioral patterns, revealing significant behavioral variations in LLMs across different languages and contexts; (2) Compared to current evaluation tools, CSI significantly improves reliability, yielding more consistent and robust results; and (3) The correlation between CSI scores and LLMs' real-world outputs exceeds 0.85, demonstrating its strong validity in predicting LLM behavior.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Mar 2025.

Builds on

22 of 71 references.

References · 22

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  3. 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,579
  4. 2023WizardLM: Empowering large pre-trained language models to follow complex instructionscited by 1,116
  5. 2023Enhancing Chat Language Models by Scaling High-quality Instructional Conversationscited by 825
  6. 2023Instruction Tuning with GPT-4cited by 676
  7. 2024WildChat: 1M ChatGPT Interaction Logs in the Wildcited by 598
  8. 2023LMSYS-Chat-1M: A Large-Scale Real-World LLM Conversation Datasetcited by 449
  9. 2023Bias Runs Deep: Implicit Reasoning Biases in Persona-Assigned LLMscited by 191
  10. 2023InCharacter: Evaluating Personality Fidelity in Role-Playing Agents through Psychological Interviewscited by 177
  11. 2023Personality Traits in Large Language Modelscited by 166
  12. 2023Having Beer after Prayer? Measuring Cultural Bias in Large Language Modelscited by 153
10 more
  1. 2022Evaluating and Inducing Personality in Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 122
  2. 2024Systematic Biases in LLM Simulations of Debatescited by 98
  3. 2023Exploring the Impact of Instruction Data Scaling on Large Language Models: An Empirical Study on Real-World Use Casescited by 85
  4. 2024The opportunities and risks of large language models in mental healthcited by 54
  5. 2023From Instructions to Intrinsic Human Values -- A Survey of Alignment Goals for Big Modelscited by 45
  6. 2024Personality Alignment of Large Language Modelscited by 36
  7. 2023LogiCoT: Logical Chain-of-Thought Instruction-Tuningcited by 31
  8. 2023Evaluating General-Purpose AI with Psychometricscited by 23
  9. 2024Can LLM "Self-report"?: Evaluating the Validity of Self-report Scales in Measuring Personality Design in LLM-based Chatbotscited by 19
  10. 2024Beyond Human Norms: Unveiling Unique Values of Large Language Models through Interdisciplinary Approachescited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Humanizing LLMs: A Survey of Psychological Measurements with Tools, Datasets, and Human-Agent Applications
  2. 2025From Five Dimensions to Many: Large Language Models as Precise and Interpretable Psychological Profilers
  3. 2025Evaluating LLM Alignment on Personality Inference from Real-World Interview Data
  4. 2025Can LLMs Infer Personality from Real World Conversations?
  5. 2024BIG5-CHAT: Shaping LLM Personalities Through Training on Human-Grounded Data
  6. 2023PersonaLLM: Investigating the Ability of Large Language Models to Express Personality Traits
  7. 2026Can LLMs Truly Embody Human Personality? Analyzing AI and Human Behavior Alignment in Dispute Resolution
  8. 2025Beyond Self-Reports: Multi-Observer Agents for Personality Assessment in Large Language Models