SMURF-THP: Score Matching-based UnceRtainty quantiFication for Transformer Hawkes Process
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Transformer Hawkes process models have shown to be successful in modeling event sequence data. However, most of the existing training methods rely on maximizing the likelihood of event sequences, which involves calculating some intractable integral. Moreover, the existing methods fail to provide uncertainty quantification for model predictions, e.g., confidence intervals for the predicted event's arrival time. To address these issues, we propose SMURF-THP, a score-based method for learning Transformer Hawkes process and quantifying prediction uncertainty. Specifically, SMURF-THP learns the score function of events' arrival time based on a score-matching objective that avoids the intractable computation. With such a learned score function, we can sample arrival time of events from the predictive distribution. This naturally allows for the quantification of uncertainty by computing confidence intervals over the generated samples. We conduct extensive experiments in both event type prediction and uncertainty quantification of arrival time. In all the experiments, SMURF-THP outperforms existing likelihood-based methods in confidence calibration while exhibiting comparable prediction accuracy.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Oct 2023.
Builds on
14 of 31 references.
References · 14
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2019Generative Modeling by Estimating Gradients of the Data Distributioncited by 4,101
- 2019Sliced Score Matching: A Scalable Approach to Density and Score Estimationcited by 384
- 2020Transformer Hawkes Processcited by 235
- 2019Fully Neural Network based Model for General Temporal Point Processescited by 122
- 2018Supervised Reinforcement Learning with Recurrent Neural Network for Dynamic Treatment Recommendationcited by 101
- 2017Modeling The Intensity Function Of Point Process Via Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 93
- 2015SEISMIC: A Self-Exciting Point Process Model for Predicting Tweet Popularitycited by 76
- 2018Mirrored Langevin Dynamicscited by 61
- 2018Learning Temporal Point Processes via Reinforcement Learningcited by 40
- 2018Deep Reinforcement Learning of Marked Temporal Point Processescited by 33
- 2020Noise-Contrastive Estimation for Multivariate Point Processescited by 20
2 more
- 2020Generalized Score Matching for General Domainscited by 13
- 2020Uncertainty Quantification for Inferring Hawkes Networkscited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 3.
7 papers.
- 2024Is Score Matching Suitable for Estimating Point Processes?cited by 5
- 2025Advances in Temporal Point Processes: Bayesian, Neural, and LLM Approachescited by 3
- 2025Enhancing Temporal Awareness in LLMs for Temporal Point Processescited by 1
- 2026Score-Based Change-Point Detection and Region Localization for Spatio-Temporal Point Processescited by 1
- 2024Preventing Conflicting Gradients in Neural Marked Temporal Point Processescited by 0
- 2026Bridging Discrete Marks and Continuous Dynamics: Dual-Path Cross-Interaction for Marked Temporal Point Processescited by 0
- 2026Efficient Temporal Point Processes via Monotone Alternating Splinescited by 0
- 2026Efficient Temporal Point Processes via Monotone Alternating Splines2 Jul 2026
- 2026Bridging Discrete Marks and Continuous Dynamics: Dual-Path Cross-Interaction for Marked Temporal Point Processes12 Mar 2026
- 2026Score-Based Change-Point Detection and Region Localization for Spatio-Temporal Point Processes4 Feb 2026
- 2025Enhancing Temporal Awareness in LLMs for Temporal Point Processes29 Dec 2025
- 2025Advances in Temporal Point Processes: Bayesian, Neural, and LLM Approaches24 Jan 2025
- 2024Preventing Conflicting Gradients in Neural Marked Temporal Point Processes11 Dec 2024
- 2024Is Score Matching Suitable for Estimating Point Processes?5 Oct 2024