POSQA: Probe the World Models of LLMs with Size Comparisons
On the map: World models → World models for language agents
Abstract (arXiv)
Embodied language comprehension emphasizes that language understanding is not solely a matter of mental processing in the brain but also involves interactions with the physical and social environment. With the explosive growth of Large Language Models (LLMs) and their already ubiquitous presence in our daily lives, it is becoming increasingly necessary to verify their real-world understanding. Inspired by cognitive theories, we propose POSQA: a Physical Object Size Question Answering dataset with simple size comparison questions to examine the extremity and analyze the potential mechanisms of the embodied comprehension of the latest LLMs. We show that even the largest LLMs today perform poorly under the zero-shot setting. We then push their limits with advanced prompting techniques and external knowledge augmentation. Furthermore, we investigate whether their real-world comprehension primarily derives from contextual information or internal weights and analyse the impact of prompt formats and report bias of different objects. Our results show that real-world understanding that LLMs shaped from textual data can be vulnerable to deception and confusion by the surface form of prompts, which makes it less aligned with human behaviours.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in World models for language agents, one of 11 directions in World models. Builds on 24 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Oct 2023.
Builds on
24 of 40 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2023Reasoning with Language Model is Planning with World Model24 May
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learners28 May
Other references · 22
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
- 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
- 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 3,024
- 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,883
- 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,588
- 2023PaLM-E: An Embodied Multimodal Language Modelcited by 2,071
- 2023Large Language Models Can Be Easily Distracted by Irrelevant Contextcited by 841
- 2023How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detectioncited by 481
10 more
- 2022Using cognitive psychology to understand GPT-3cited by 398
- 2020Experience Grounds Languagecited by 242
- 2021Generated Knowledge Prompting for Commonsense Reasoningcited by 214
- 2023An Analysis of the Automatic Bug Fixing Performance of ChatGPTcited by 110
- 2023ChatGPT is not all you need. A State of the Art Review of large Generative AI modelscited by 86
- 2022Mind's Eye: Grounded Language Model Reasoning through Simulationcited by 84
- 2023Collaborating with language models for embodied reasoningcited by 61
- 2021PROST: Physical Reasoning of Objects through Space and Timecited by 48
- 2023Putting ChatGPT's Medical Advice to the (Turing) Testcited by 24
- 2023AI Insights into Theoretical Physics and the Swampland Program: A Journey Through the Cosmos with ChatGPTcited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
2 papers.
- 2024Towards Uncertainty-Aware Language Agentcited by 32
- 2026Large Language Model Reasoning Failurescited by 21
- 2026Large Language Model Reasoning Failures5 Feb 2026
- 2024Towards Uncertainty-Aware Language Agent25 Jan 2024
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024A little less conversation, a little more action, please: Investigating the physical common-sense of LLMs in a 3D embodied environment
- 2024Exploring Perceptual Limitation of Multimodal Large Language Models
- 2025Reasoning Capabilities and Invariability of Large Language Models
- 2024Beyond Accuracy: Evaluating the Reasoning Behavior of Large Language Models -- A Survey
- 2025Hidden in the Haystack: Smaller Needles are More Difficult for LLMs to Find
- 2026Understanding Large Language Models
- 2023NEWTON: Are Large Language Models Capable of Physical Reasoning?
- 2022On Reality and the Limits of Language Data: Aligning LLMs with Human Norms