Maximizing Stylistic Control and Semantic Accuracy in NLG: Personality Variation and Discourse Contrast
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Neural generation methods for task-oriented dialogue typically generate from a meaning representation that is populated using a database of domain information, such as a table of data describing a restaurant. While earlier work focused solely on the semantic fidelity of outputs, recent work has started to explore methods for controlling the style of the generated text while simultaneously achieving semantic accuracy. Here we experiment with two stylistic benchmark tasks, generating language that exhibits variation in personality, and generating discourse contrast. We report a huge performance improvement in both stylistic control and semantic accuracy over the state of the art on both of these benchmarks. We test several different models and show that putting stylistic conditioning in the decoder and eliminating the semantic re-ranker used in earlier models results in more than 15 points higher BLEU for Personality, with a reduction of semantic error to near zero. We also report an improvement from .75 to .81 in controlling contrast and a reduction in semantic error from 16% to 2%.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 Jul 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 0; 2023: 6; 2024: 3; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
12 papers.
- 2024Two Tales of Persona in LLMs: A Survey of Role-Playing and Personalizationcited by 208
- 2024LLM Agents in Interaction: Measuring Personality Consistency and Linguistic Alignment in Interacting Populations of Large Language Modelscited by 33
- 2023Controlling Personality Style in Dialogue with Zero-Shot Prompt-Based Learningcited by 14
- 2023On the Effectiveness of Creating Conversational Agent Personalities Through Promptingcited by 10
- 2021Jurassic is (almost) All You Need: Few-Shot Meaning-to-Text Generation for Open-Domain Dialoguecited by 6
- 2023A Survey of Personality, Persona, and Profile in Conversational Agents and Chatbotscited by 5
- 2021Athena 2.0: Contextualized Dialogue Management for an Alexa Prize SocialBotcited by 4
- 2023Controllable Generation of Dialogue Acts for Dialogue Systems via Few-Shot Response Generation and Rankingcited by 4
- 2024A Systematic Review of Data-to-Text NLGcited by 4
- 2026The Bots of Persuasion: Examining How Conversational Agents' Linguistic Expressions of Personality Affect User Perceptions and Decisionscited by 2
- 2023Athena 2.0: Discourse and User Modeling in Open Domain Dialoguecited by 0
- 2023Source Prompt: Coordinated Pre-training of Language Models on Diverse Corpora from Multiple Sourcescited by 0
- 2026The Bots of Persuasion: Examining How Conversational Agents' Linguistic Expressions of Personality Affect User Perceptions and Decisions19 Feb 2026
- 2024Two Tales of Persona in LLMs: A Survey of Role-Playing and Personalization3 Jun 2024
- 2024A Systematic Review of Data-to-Text NLG13 Feb 2024
- 2024LLM Agents in Interaction: Measuring Personality Consistency and Linguistic Alignment in Interacting Populations of Large Language Models5 Feb 2024
- 2023A Survey of Personality, Persona, and Profile in Conversational Agents and Chatbots31 Dec 2023
- 2023Source Prompt: Coordinated Pre-training of Language Models on Diverse Corpora from Multiple Sources16 Nov 2023
- 2023On the Effectiveness of Creating Conversational Agent Personalities Through Prompting17 Oct 2023
- 2023Athena 2.0: Discourse and User Modeling in Open Domain Dialogue3 Aug 2023
- 2023Controllable Generation of Dialogue Acts for Dialogue Systems via Few-Shot Response Generation and Ranking26 Jul 2023
- 2023Controlling Personality Style in Dialogue with Zero-Shot Prompt-Based Learning8 Feb 2023
- 2021Athena 2.0: Contextualized Dialogue Management for an Alexa Prize SocialBot3 Nov 2021
- 2021Jurassic is (almost) All You Need: Few-Shot Meaning-to-Text Generation for Open-Domain Dialogue15 Oct 2021