Enhancing Trustworthiness in ML-Based Network Intrusion Detection with Uncertainty Quantification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The evolution of Internet and its related communication technologies have consistently increased the risk of cyber-attacks. In this context, a crucial role is played by Intrusion Detection Systems (IDSs), which are security devices designed to identify and mitigate attacks to modern networks. Data-driven approaches based on Machine Learning (ML) have gained more and more popularity for executing the classification tasks required by signature-based IDSs. However, typical ML models adopted for this purpose do not properly take into account the uncertainty associated with their prediction. This poses significant challenges, as they tend to produce misleadingly high classification scores for both misclassified inputs and inputs belonging to unknown classes (e.g. novel attacks), limiting the trustworthiness of existing ML-based solutions. In this paper, we argue that ML-based IDSs should always provide accurate uncertainty quantification to avoid overconfident predictions. In fact, an uncertainty-aware classification would be beneficial to enhance closed-set classification performance, would make it possible to carry out Active Learning, and would help recognize inputs of unknown classes as truly unknowns, unlocking open-set classification capabilities and Out-of-Distribution (OoD) detection. To verify it, we compare various ML-based methods for uncertainty quantification and for open-set classification, either specifically designed for or tailored to the domain of network intrusion detection. Moreover, we develop a custom model based on Bayesian Neural Networks to ensure reliable uncertainty estimates and improve the OoD detection capabilities, thus showing how proper uncertainty quantification can be exploited to significantly enhance the trustworthiness of ML-based IDSs.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 74 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Sep 2023.
Builds on
32 of 74 references.
References · 32
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
- 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,501
- 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,385
- 2018Spectral Normalization for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 1,636
- 2020Energy-based Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 1,299
- 2015Fast and Accurate Deep Network Learning by Exponential Linear Units (ELUs)cited by 1,070
- 2017Deep Bayesian Active Learning with Image Datacited by 819
20 more
- 2021Generalized Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Surveycited by 802
- 2014Deep Neural Networks are Easily Fooled: High Confidence Predictions for Unrecognizable Imagescited by 776
- 2015Towards Open Set Deep Networkscited by 538
- 2020Bayesian Deep Learning and a Probabilistic Perspective of Generalizationcited by 480
- 2019Measuring Calibration in Deep Learningcited by 446
- 2020Simple and Principled Uncertainty Estimation with Deterministic Deep Learning via Distance Awarenesscited by 389
- 2018Understanding Measures of Uncertainty for Adversarial Example Detectioncited by 177
- 2018Flipout: Efficient Pseudo-Independent Weight Perturbations on Mini-Batchescited by 133
- 2017Deep Active Learning for Named Entity Recognitioncited by 108
- 2017TensorFlow Distributionscited by 106
- 2023Prediction-Oriented Bayesian Active Learningcited by 62
- 2020Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty with Random Forestscited by 43
- 2021Towards a Standard Feature Set for Network Intrusion Detection System Datasetscited by 40
- 2016Challenges and Opportunities in Edge Computingcited by 26
- 2021Evaluating Federated Learning for Intrusion Detection in Internet of Things: Review and Challengescited by 16
- 2022The Cross-evaluation of Machine Learning-based Network Intrusion Detection Systemscited by 8
- 2023Machine Learning Based Intrusion Detection Systems for IoT Applicationscited by 4
- 2021Learning to Detect: A Data-driven Approach for Network Intrusion Detectioncited by 1
- 2021A Novel Open Set Energy-based Flow Classifier for Network Intrusion Detectioncited by 1
- 2023Introducing Packet-Level Analysis in Programmable Data Planes to Advance Network Intrusion Detectioncited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.