mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

RES-DARE: Failure-Aware Expert Adaptation and Rollback-Safe Self-Repair for Intrusion Detection

arXiv 2607.02687 ↗First posted 2 Jul 2026cs.CR cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Intrusion detection systems are often trained under static benchmark conditions, although deployed network environments are affected by traffic drift, sensor noise, changing workloads, and evolving attack behaviour. Under such distribution shifts, static detectors may produce confident but incorrect predictions, leading to silent and unsafe failure modes. In this paper, RES-DARE (Recursive Evolving Specialists-Digital Adaptive Reasoning Engine) is proposed as a failure-aware continual intrusion detection framework with rollback-safe self-repair. Difficult, uncertain, and misclassified samples are treated as failure signals for expert specialisation rather than being discarded as noise. A supervised contrastive encoder, two-pass expert router, failure-buffer mechanism, HDBSCAN-based failure-region discovery, and trust-risk monitor are integrated to support adaptive IDS behaviour. AEHM-v2 is introduced as a rollback-safe repair mechanism, where candidate adaptations are provisionally activated and committed only when macro-F1 is preserved or improved while trust risk remains stable. Otherwise, the system is rolled back to its last validated state. RES-DARE is evaluated on CICIDS2017, UNSW-NB15, and TONIoT, achieving macro-F1 scores of 0.9850, 0.9736, and 0.9691, respectively. Under Gaussian feature corruption at strength 0.10, RES-DARE retains an Attack-F1 of 0.7920 on CICIDS2017 and achieves near-zero catastrophic forgetting with F = 0.0015. The results show that RES-DARE improves robustness, warning capability, and deployment safety under degraded conditions.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jul 2026.

Builds on

18 of 45 references.

References · 18

  1. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  2. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
  3. 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,509
  4. 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,829
  5. 2018Continual Lifelong Learning with Neural Networks: A Reviewcited by 1,330
  6. 2021DyTox: Transformers for Continual Learning with DYnamic TOken eXpansioncited by 291
  7. 2019Continual Learning via Neural Pruningcited by 101
  8. 2025A Comprehensive Survey of Mixture-of-Experts: Algorithms, Theory, and Applicationscited by 91
  9. 2023A Multi-Agent Adaptive Deep Learning Framework for Online Intrusion Detectioncited by 5
  10. 2023Enhancing Trustworthiness in ML-Based Network Intrusion Detection with Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 2
  11. 2025Improving Open-world Continual Learning under the Constraints of Scarce Labeled Datacited by 2
  12. 2026QCL-IDS: Quantum Continual Learning for Intrusion Detection with Fidelity-Anchored Stability and Generative Replaycited by 2
6 more
  1. 2026DynaMoE: Dynamic Token-Level Expert Activation with Layer-Wise Adaptive Capacity for Mixture-of-Experts Neural Networkscited by 2
  2. 2026SPHERE: Mitigating the Loss of Spectral Plasticity in Mixture-of-Experts for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 2
  3. 2023Are Existing Out-Of-Distribution Techniques Suitable for Network Intrusion Detection?cited by 1
  4. 2024Feature Distribution Shift Mitigation with Contrastive Pretraining for Intrusion Detectioncited by 1
  5. 2026ACORN-IDS: Adaptive Continual Novelty Detection for Intrusion Detection Systemscited by 1
  6. 2026Quantifying Catastrophic Forgetting in IoT Intrusion Detection Systemscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.