mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

DropMix: Better Graph Contrastive Learning with Harder Negative Samples

arXiv 2310.09764 ↗First posted 15 Oct 2023cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

While generating better negative samples for contrastive learning has been widely studied in the areas of CV and NLP, very few work has focused on graph-structured data. Recently, Mixup has been introduced to synthesize hard negative samples in graph contrastive learning (GCL). However, due to the unsupervised learning nature of GCL, without the help of soft labels, directly mixing representations of samples could inadvertently lead to the information loss of the original hard negative and further adversely affect the quality of the newly generated harder negative. To address the problem, in this paper, we propose a novel method DropMix to synthesize harder negative samples, which consists of two main steps. Specifically, we first select some hard negative samples by measuring their hardness from both local and global views in the graph simultaneously. After that, we mix hard negatives only on partial representation dimensions to generate harder ones and decrease the information loss caused by Mixup. We conduct extensive experiments to verify the effectiveness of DropMix on six benchmark datasets. Our results show that our method can lead to better GCL performance. Our data and codes are publicly available at https://github.com/Mayueq/DropMix-Code.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Oct 2023.

Builds on

25 of 36 references.

References · 25

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  3. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
  4. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,777
  5. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
  6. 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,884
  7. 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,811
  8. 2020Improved Baselines with Momentum Contrastive Learningcited by 2,287
  9. 2016Variational Graph Auto-Encoderscited by 1,382
  10. 2020Graph Contrastive Learning with Augmentationscited by 1,208
  11. 2018Deep Graph Infomaxcited by 1,106
  12. 2020What Makes for Good Views for Contrastive Learning?cited by 846
13 more
  1. 2019Learning Representations by Maximizing Mutual Information Across Viewscited by 734
  2. 2020Contrastive Multi-View Representation Learning on Graphscited by 652
  3. 2020Contrastive Learning with Hard Negative Samplescited by 628
  4. 2020Deep Graph Contrastive Representation Learningcited by 539
  5. 2020Graph Contrastive Learning with Adaptive Augmentationcited by 519
  6. 2019Diffusion Improves Graph Learningcited by 414
  7. 2020Hard Negative Mixing for Contrastive Learningcited by 402
  8. 2020Graph Representation Learning via Graphical Mutual Information Maximizationcited by 217
  9. 2020Data Augmentation for Graph Neural Networkscited by 203
  10. 2021ProGCL: Rethinking Hard Negative Mining in Graph Contrastive Learningcited by 72
  11. 2021Multi-Scale Contrastive Siamese Networks for Self-Supervised Graph Representation Learningcited by 70
  12. 2020Are all negatives created equal in contrastive instance discrimination?cited by 50
  13. 2020Reinforced Negative Sampling over Knowledge Graph for Recommendationcited by 40

Built on by

Not cited yet.