A Geometrical Approach to Evaluate the Adversarial Robustness of Deep Neural Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) are widely used for computer vision tasks. However, it has been shown that deep models are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, i.e., their performances drop when imperceptible perturbations are made to the original inputs, which may further degrade the following visual tasks or introduce new problems such as data and privacy security. Hence, metrics for evaluating the robustness of deep models against adversarial attacks are desired. However, previous metrics are mainly proposed for evaluating the adversarial robustness of shallow networks on the small-scale datasets. Although the Cross Lipschitz Extreme Value for nEtwork Robustness (CLEVER) metric has been proposed for large-scale datasets (e.g., the ImageNet dataset), it is computationally expensive and its performance relies on a tractable number of samples. In this paper, we propose the Adversarial Converging Time Score (ACTS), an attack-dependent metric that quantifies the adversarial robustness of a DNN on a specific input. Our key observation is that local neighborhoods on a DNN's output surface would have different shapes given different inputs. Hence, given different inputs, it requires different time for converging to an adversarial sample. Based on this geometry meaning, ACTS measures the converging time as an adversarial robustness metric. We validate the effectiveness and generalization of the proposed ACTS metric against different adversarial attacks on the large-scale ImageNet dataset using state-of-the-art deep networks. Extensive experiments show that our ACTS metric is an efficient and effective adversarial metric over the previous CLEVER metric.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 45 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2023.
Builds on
45 of 59 references.
References · 45
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,475
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
- 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,769
- 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,517
- 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,318
- 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,268
33 more
- 2016Practical Black-Box Attacks against Machine Learningcited by 903
- 2015The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settingscited by 790
- 2017Reluplex: An Efficient SMT Solver for Verifying Deep Neural Networkscited by 744
- 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 727
- 2015Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networkscited by 678
- 2017ZOO: Zeroth Order Optimization based Black-box Attacks to Deep Neural Networks without Training Substitute Modelscited by 666
- 2018Improving Transferability of Adversarial Examples with Input Diversitycited by 599
- 2018Black-box Adversarial Attacks with Limited Queries and Informationcited by 501
- 2017Decision-Based Adversarial Attacks: Reliable Attacks Against Black-Box Machine Learning Modelscited by 462
- 2018Threat of Adversarial Attacks on Deep Learning in Computer Vision: A Surveycited by 460
- 2018Efficient Neural Network Robustness Certification with General Activation Functionscited by 445
- 2019Evading Defenses to Transferable Adversarial Examples by Translation-Invariant Attackscited by 442
- 2017Certifying Some Distributional Robustness with Principled Adversarial Trainingcited by 337
- 2018Towards Fast Computation of Certified Robustness for ReLU Networkscited by 255
- 2018Adversarial Logit Pairingcited by 224
- 2019Improving Adversarial Robustness via Promoting Ensemble Diversitycited by 213
- 2018Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networks: An Extreme Value Theory Approachcited by 182
- 2019Efficient Decision-based Black-box Adversarial Attacks on Face Recognitioncited by 175
- 2017Towards Robust Neural Networks via Random Self-ensemblecited by 159
- 2017EAD: Elastic-Net Attacks to Deep Neural Networks via Adversarial Examplescited by 155
- 2018Is Robustness the Cost of Accuracy? -- A Comprehensive Study on the Robustness of 18 Deep Image Classification Modelscited by 135
- 2018Query-Efficient Hard-label Black-box Attack:An Optimization-based Approachcited by 130
- 2018Adversarial Attacks and Defences Competitioncited by 96
- 2019NATTACK: Learning the Distributions of Adversarial Examples for an Improved Black-Box Attack on Deep Neural Networkscited by 94
- 2016Measuring Neural Net Robustness with Constraintscited by 90
- 2021Object Tracking by Jointly Exploiting Frame and Event Domaincited by 84
- 2017Exploring the Landscape of Spatial Robustnesscited by 81
- 2018Adv-BNN: Improved Adversarial Defense through Robust Bayesian Neural Networkcited by 69
- 2018Resisting Adversarial Attacks using Gaussian Mixture Variational Autoencoderscited by 26
- 2017Extending Defensive Distillationcited by 23
- 2022Biologically Inspired Dynamic Thresholds for Spiking Neural Networkscited by 19
- 2019ROSA: Robust Salient Object Detection against Adversarial Attackscited by 10
- 2020Learning to fool the speaker recognitioncited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
2 papers.