mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Resolving the Imbalance Issue in Hierarchical Disciplinary Topic Inference via LLM-based Data Augmentation

arXiv 2310.05318 ↗First posted 9 Oct 2023cs.CLcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In addressing the imbalanced issue of data within the realm of Natural Language Processing, text data augmentation methods have emerged as pivotal solutions. This data imbalance is prevalent in the research proposals submitted during the funding application process. Such imbalances, resulting from the varying popularity of disciplines or the emergence of interdisciplinary studies, significantly impede the precision of downstream topic models that deduce the affiliated disciplines of these proposals. At the data level, proposals penned by experts and scientists are inherently complex technological texts, replete with intricate terminologies, which augmenting such specialized text data poses unique challenges. At the system level, this, in turn, compromises the fairness of AI-assisted reviewer assignment systems, which raises a spotlight on solving this issue. This study leverages large language models (Llama V1) as data generators to augment research proposals categorized within intricate disciplinary hierarchies, aiming to rectify data imbalances and enhance the equity of expert assignments. We first sample within the hierarchical structure to find the under-represented class. Then we designed a prompt for keyword-based research proposal generation. Our experiments attests to the efficacy of the generated data, demonstrating that research proposals produced using the prompts can effectively address the aforementioned issues and generate high quality scientific text data, thus help the model overcome the imbalanced issue.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Oct 2023.

Builds on

19 of 29 references.

References · 19

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  3. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  4. 2023AugGPT: Leveraging ChatGPT for Text Data Augmentationcited by 130
  5. 2021TURINGBENCH: A Benchmark Environment for Turing Test in the Age of Neural Text Generationcited by 120
  6. 2019Generative Adversarial Minority Oversamplingcited by 73
  7. 2023Can ChatGPT replace StackOverflow? A Study on Robustness and Reliability of Large Language Model Code Generationcited by 73
  8. 2023Beyond Discrete Selection: Continuous Embedding Space Optimization for Generative Feature Selectioncited by 28
  9. 2022Traceable Automatic Feature Transformation via Cascading Actor-Critic Agentscited by 26
  10. 2023Traceable Group-Wise Self-Optimizing Feature Transformation Learning: A Dual Optimization Perspectivecited by 24
  11. 2023Reinforcement-Enhanced Autoregressive Feature Transformation: Gradient-steered Search in Continuous Space for Postfix Expressionscited by 23
  12. 2023CohortGPT: An Enhanced GPT for Participant Recruitment in Clinical Studycited by 19
7 more
  1. 2021Expert Knowledge-Guided Length-Variant Hierarchical Label Generation for Proposal Classificationcited by 9
  2. 2021RPT: Toward Transferable Model on Heterogeneous Researcher Data via Pre-Trainingcited by 9
  3. 2022Hierarchical Interdisciplinary Topic Detection Model for Research Proposal Classificationcited by 8
  4. 2023Interdisciplinary Fairness in Imbalanced Research Proposal Topic Inference: A Hierarchical Transformer-based Method with Selective Interpolationcited by 8
  5. 2022NEEDED: Introducing Hierarchical Transformer to Eye Diseases Diagnosiscited by 7
  6. 2023SimplyRetrieve: A Private and Lightweight Retrieval-Centric Generative AI Toolcited by 6
  7. 2022Who Should Review Your Proposal? Interdisciplinary Topic Path Detection for Research Proposalscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 5; 2025: 4; 2026: 2.

11 papers.